多焦软镜与角膜塑形镜控制近视效果及安全性分析

杜婉丽; 吴彩云; 梁刚; 张瑜; 马小英; 连露露

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.007

多焦软镜与角膜塑形镜控制近视效果及安全性分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.09.007

1.
甘肃省妇幼保健院眼科, 兰州 730050
2.
云南大学附属医院眼科

基金项目:

云南省高层次卫生健康技术人才培养计划 D-2018016

详细信息

作者简介:
杜婉丽(1971-), 女, 甘肃兰州人, 硕士, 主任医师, 主要从事小儿眼科和视光学方面工作

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: R778.11 R779.7 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 365
- HTML全文浏览量: 253
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-04
- 修回日期: 2022-03-25
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-23
- 刊出日期: 2022-09-25

Clinical analysis of orthokeratologylens and multifocal soft lens in safety and effect

1.
Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Lanzhou (730050), China

摘要

摘要: 目的通过对多焦软镜和角膜塑形镜的研究, 比较两者控制近视的有效性和临床安全性。方法采用前瞻性研究方法, 选择在甘肃省妇幼保健院配戴硬性角膜塑形镜和多焦软镜的患者各60例(120眼), 两组均在戴镜前, 戴镜后1, 3, 6, 12个月进行眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷调查; 同时检查泪膜破裂时间(BUT)、角膜染色评分(CSF)、睑板腺功能评估, 分析戴镜前后眼表功能, 并对两组患者在戴镜6, 12, 18个月后观察眼轴及屈光度数变化, 以评估近视控制效果。结果硬镜组BUT在戴镜后2月开始低于软镜组, 差异有统计学意义(t=4.35, P < 0.05)。硬镜组戴镜后1个月开始, BUT短于戴镜前, 差异有统计学意义(F=305.83, P < 0.05)。软镜组在戴镜6个月后的BUT差异无统计学意义(F=0.38, P>0.05)。CSF和睑板腺功能评估两组在戴镜前后及两组间差异均无统计学意义(F_时间值分别为1.55, 1.38, 10.15, 1.50, F_组间值分别为2.31, 0.02, P值均>0.05)。硬镜组戴镜后18个月, 球镜度数平均增长-0.53 D, 和戴镜前近视度数差异有统计学意义(F=6.54, P < 0.05)。软镜组戴镜后18个月, 球镜度数平均增长-0.34 D, 和戴镜前近视度数差异有统计学意义(F=2.88, P < 0.05)。硬镜组和软镜组戴镜后18个月, 眼轴的增长差异均有统计学意义(F值分别为2.73, 2.83, P值均 < 0.05)。结论角膜塑形镜和多焦软镜均为控制近视安全有效的措施。
- 接触镜 /
- 近视 /
- 临床对照试验 /
- 方差分析 /
- 儿童 /
- 青少年
Abstract: Objective To compare the effectiveness and clinical safety between the two through the observation of Orthokeratology lens and multifocal soft lens. Methods By using prospective longitudinal design, sixty patients (120 eyes) with orthokeratology lens and multifocal soft lens were selected. After 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, our tests were conducted, including ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break-up time(BUT), corneal fluerescein staining (CSF) and meibomian gland function assessment, before and after wearing glasses, ocular axis and refraction in 6, 12 and 18 months after were evaluated to assess the effect of myopia control. Results But in the orthokeratology lens group was lower than the soft lens group after two months. The difference was statistically significant(t=4.35, P < 0.05). After 1 month of wearing glasses, BUT in the orthokeratologylens group was shorter than before(F=305.83, P < 0.05). In the group of soft lens, there was no statistically significance before and after wearing glasses(F=0.38, P>0.05). There was no difference in corneal fluorescence staining (CSF) and meibomian gland function between the two groups before and after wearing glasses.(F_time=1.55, 1.38, 10.15, 1.50, P>0.05, F_group=2.31, 0.02, P>0.05). After 18 months of wearing orthokeratology lens, the average degree of spherical lens increased by -0.53 D, which was different from that before wearing(F=6.54, P < 0.05). After wearing soft lens 18 month, the average degree of spherical lens increase by -0.34 D, which was different from that before wearing(F=2.88, P < 0.05). After 18 months of wearing glasses, there were differences in the growth of ocular axis between the two groups(F=2.73, 2.83, P < 0.05). Conclusion Orthokeratology lens and multifocal soft lens are both safe and effective measures to control myopia.
- Contact lenses /
- Myopia /
- Controlled clinical trial /
- Analysis of variance /
- Child /
- Adolescent
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 硬镜组与软镜组戴镜前后OSDI问卷评分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of OSDI questionnaire scores before and after wearing in the hard and soft mirror groups(x±s)

组别	人数	戴镜前	戴镜1月	戴镜3月	戴镜6月
硬镜组	60	3.04±0.19	3.43±0.20	3.89±0.23	3.24±0.22
软镜组	60	3.00±0.16	3.02±0.16	3.05±0.17	3.11±0.15
t值		0.36	2.86	7.29	6.85
P值		0.55	0.09	0.01	0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 硬镜组与软镜组戴镜前后BUT比较(x±s，s)

Table 2. Comparison of BUT changes before and after wearing in the hard and soft mirror groups(x±s, s)

组别	眼数	戴镜前	戴镜1月	戴镜2月	戴镜3月	戴镜6月
硬镜组	120	10.56±1.21	7.47±1.92	7.30±1.16	7.41±1.14	7.40±1.14
软镜组	120	10.45±1.21	10.33±1.17	10.30±1.14	10.30±1.14	10.30±1.14
t值		0.66	0.39	4.35	7.58	7.93
P值		0.42	0.53	0.04	0.01	0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 硬镜组与软镜组戴镜前后SIT与CFS评分比较[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]

Table 3. Comparison of lipid and corneal staining scores between the before and after wearing the hard and soft mirror groups[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]

组别	眼数	睑板腺脂质					角膜染色
组别	眼数	戴镜前	戴镜1月	戴镜3月	戴镜6月	戴镜12月	戴镜前	戴镜1月	戴镜3月	戴镜6月	戴镜12月
硬镜组	120	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 0)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)
软镜组	120	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)	0(0, 1)

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 硬镜组与软镜组患者治疗前后等效球镜度与眼轴长度情况(x±s)

Table 4. The changes of diopter before and after wearing glasses in the two groups(x±s)

组别	眼数	等效球镜度/D				眼轴长度/mm
组别	眼数	治疗前	戴镜6月	戴镜12月	戴镜18月	治疗前	戴镜6月	戴镜12月	戴镜18月
硬镜组	120	-2.85±1.04	-2.87±1.04	-3.15±0.98	-3.38±1.20	23.68±0.60	23.71±0.60	23.79±0.61	24.30±0.71
软镜组	120	-6.37±1.35	-6.51±1.27	-6.67±1.29	-6.71±1.41	24.18±0.80	24.21±0.69	24.27±0.71	24.89±0.62

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(10)

[1]	WANG J, LI Y, MUSCH D C, et al. Progression of myopia in school-aged children after COVID-19 home confinement[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2021. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.6239.
[2]	亚洲干眼协会, 海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会眼科学专业委员会眼表与泪液病学组, 中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼表与干眼学组. 中国干眼专家共识: 检查和诊断(2020年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2020, 56(10): 741-747. Asia Dry Eye Society, Association of Medical Exchanges Across the Taiwan Straits Professional Committee of Ophthalmology Ocular Surface and Lacrimopathy Group, Eye Table and Dry Ophthalmology Group, Ophthalmologists Branch, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Consensus of Chinese dry eye experts: exam and diagnosis(2020)[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56(10): 741-747.
[3]	ZHENG B, LIU X J, SUN Y F, et al. Development and validation of the Chinese version of dry eye related quality of life scale[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2017, 15(1): 145. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0718-5
[4]	TOMLINSON A, BRON A J, KORB D R, et al. The international workshop on meibomian glanddys function: report of the diagnosis subcommittee[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(4): 2006-2049. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997f
[5]	张明昌, 刘洋. 解读国际泪膜与眼表协会2017年干眼专家共识中的干眼检查[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2018, 54(2): 87-89. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2018.02.003 ZHANG M C, LIU Y. Interpretation of the dry eye examination in the expert consensus of Tear Film & Ocular Surface society in 2017[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2018, 54(2): 87-89. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2018.02.003
[6]	杨立, 俞萍萍. 过夜配戴角膜塑形镜对儿童青少年眼表和睑板腺的影响[J]. 中华眼视光与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(1): 51-57. YANG L, YU P P. The influence of overnight orthokeratology on the ocular surface and meibomian glands in children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Optometry Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2020, 22(1): 51-57.
[7]	周建兰, 谢培英, 王丹, 等. 青少年高度近视眼患者长期配戴角膜塑形镜的效果观察[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2015, 51(7): 515-519. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.07.009 ZHOU J L, XIE P Y, WANG D, et al. Observation on the effect of long-term wearing orthokeratology lens in adolescent patients with high myopia[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2015, 51(7): 515-519. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.07.009
[8]	COOPER J, O'CONNOR B, WATANABE R, et al. Case series analysis of myopic progression control with a unique extended depth of focus multifocal contact lens[J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2018, 44(5): e16-e24. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000440
[9]	WALLINE J J, GREINER K L, MCVEY M E, et al. Multifocal contact lens myopia control[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(11): 1207-1214. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000036
[10]	WALLINE J J, LINDSLEY K B, VEDULA S S, et al. Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children[J]. Coch Dat Syst Rev, 2020, 1(1): CD004916.