小学生身体活动久坐行为与身体姿态健康的关系

赵修发; 李超; 刘洋; 曾艳; 易国锋

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.08.022

小学生身体活动久坐行为与身体姿态健康的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.08.022

赵修发¹,
李超^2, ,,
刘洋³,
曾艳¹,
易国锋^{1, 4}

1.
北京体育大学教育学院，北京 100084
2.
北京体育大学运动人体科学学院/运动与体质健康教育部重点实验室
3.
山东建筑大学体育教学部
4.
北京师范大学附属奥林匹克花园小学

基金项目:

教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目 18YJC890026

教育发展研究十三五规划课题 JFYE2843

详细信息

作者简介:
赵修发(1990-)，男，山东滕州人，在读博士，主要研究方向为儿童体质健康与促进

通讯作者:
李超，E-mail：lichaobt@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G806 G627.8 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 569
- HTML全文浏览量: 223
- PDF下载量: 55
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-08
- 修回日期: 2022-05-16
- 网络出版日期: 2022-08-24
- 刊出日期: 2022-08-25

Correlations between physical activity, sedentary behavior and physical posture disorders in primary school students

ZHAO Xiufa¹,
LI Chao^{2
, ,},
LIU Yang³,
ZENG Yan¹,
YI Guofeng^{1, 4}

1.
School of Education, Beijing Sport University, Beijing(100084), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究小学生身体活动(physical activity, PA)、久坐行为(sedentary behavior, SB)与身体姿态健康的关系，为该群体异常身体姿态预防、矫正提供参考。方法 2020年9—12月，采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样法，抽取北京市朝阳区4所学校206名小学生为研究对象，采用Body-Style身体姿态测试仪、ActiGraph GT3X+三轴加速度计客观测量身体姿态、PA，采用儿童休闲活动调查问卷调查SB。结果小学生异常身体姿态检出率为76.70%；PA与高低肩、X/O型腿、骨盆前倾、脊柱侧弯、综合测评具有正向线性相关(β值分别为0.17，0.21，0.19，0.24，0.19，P值均 < 0.05)；SB与高低肩、X/O型腿、骨盆前倾、脊柱侧弯、综合测评具有负向线性相关(β值分别为-0.24，-0.22，-0.36，-0.24，-0.27，P值均 < 0.05)。对PA、SB联合分析，在高PA、低SB(OR=2.12，95%CI=1.46~3.37，P < 0.05)和低PA、高SB两个极端组合时，身体姿态测评合格率获得优势分别为最高和最低；高PA、高SB(OR=1.85, 95%CI=1.38~2.86)与低SB、低PA (OR=1.71, 95%CI=1.41~2.74)比较，身体姿态测评合格率获得优势更高。结论对于小学生身体姿态健康，PA是独立促进因素，SB是独立危险因素，二者联合具有抵消或协同的交互效应。
- 运动活动 /
- 行为 /
- 体型 /
- 生长和发育 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore correlations between physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB) and physical posture disorders in primary school students, and to provide reference for the prevention and correction of adverse body posture in this group. Methods From September to December 2020, 206 children from 4 primary schools in Chaoyang District of Beijing were selected by multistage stratified cluster random sampling method. Body posture and PA were assessed using a body posture tester and a triaxial accelerometer. Children's Leisure Activity Questionnaire was used to investigate SB. Results The detection rate of abnormal body posture in primary school students was 76.70%. PA showed positive assocation with high and low shoulder, X/O leg, pelvis forward, spine curvature and comprehensive evaluation (β=0.17, 0.21, 0.19, 0.24, 0.19, P < 0.05). SB had significant negative linear correlation with high and low shoulder, X/O leg, pelvis forward, spine curvature and comprehensive evaluation (β=-0.24, -0.22, -0.36, -0.24, -0.27, P < 0.05). In the combination analysis, children with high PA plus low SB (OR=2.12, 95%CI=1.46-3.37, P < 0.05) and children with low PA plus high SB had the highest and lowest advantages of qualified rate of body posture assessment, respectively. Compare with low SB and low PA(OR=1.71, 95%CI=1.41-2.74, P < 0.05), high PA and high SB (OR=1.85, 95%CI=1.38-2.86, P < 0.05) had higher qualified rate of body posture assessment. Conclusion Physical activity shows positive effects on physical posture while sedentary behavior shows negative effects on physical posture. The combination of PA and SB has a counteracting or synergistic interaction effect.
- Motor activity /
- Behavior /
- Somatotypes /
- Growth and development /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同组别小学生不良身体姿态检出率比较

Table 1. Comparison of the detection rate of bad body posture among pupils of different groups

组别	选项	人数	检出人数	χ²值	P值
性别	男	111	81(72.97)	9.17	0.02
	女	95	77(81.05)
年龄/岁	7~8	72	53 (73.61)	12.68	0.02
	9~10	69	53(76.81)
	11~12	65	52(80.00)
BMI	正常	63	46(73.01)	6.45	< 0.01
	超重	107	82(76.64)
	肥胖	36	30(83.33)
注： ()内数字为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同类型体力活动与久坐行为小学生身体姿态测评指标得分(x±s)

Table 2. Body posture evaluation index scores of students with different types of physical activity and sedentary behavior(x±s)

组别	选项	人数	高低肩	骨盆侧倾	X/O型腿	颈椎前倾	骨盆前倾	脊柱侧弯	肩胛骨倾斜	综合测评
体力活动	LPA	84	3.26±0.14	3.06±0.62	2.36±0.68	3.36±0.12	2.64±0.44	2.82±0.31	2.87±0.12	20.68±2.67
	MPA	63	3.29±0.41	3.11±0.41	2.86±0.18	3.40±0.26	2.85±0.17	3.02±0.47	3.02±0.27	21.71±1.67
	HPA	59	3.61±0.30	3.16±0.25	3.06±0.43	3.47±0.28	3.16±0.44	3.24±0.14	3.18±0.19	22.88±2.90
久坐行为	LSB	83	3.36±0.14	3.28±0.62	2.66±0.51	3.46±0.12	2.94±0.44	3.32±0.21	3.28±0.13	22.30±2.57
	HSB	123	3.02±0.14	2.86±0.62	2.14±0.33	3.17±0.41	2.54±0.27	2.83±0.38	3.15±0.20	19.71±2.10

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 小学生PA、SB与身体姿态测评指标的相关性分析(β值，n=206)

Table 3. Correlation analysis between PA, SB and body posture evaluation indexes (β, n=206)

因变量	选项	高低肩	骨盆侧倾	X/O型腿	颈椎前倾	骨盆前倾	脊柱侧弯	肩胛骨倾斜	综合测评
体力活动	模式1	0.17^*	0.03	0.21^*	0.04	0.19^*	0.24^*	0.05	0.19^*
	模式2	0.20^*	0.04	0.23	0.03	0.21^*	0.27^*	0.07	0.15^*
久坐行为	模式1	-0.24^**	-0.17	-0.22^*	-0.02	-0.36^**	-0.24^*	0.03	-0.27^**
	模式2	-0.12^**	-0.09	-0.45	-0.06	-0.41^*	-0.29^*	-0.13	-0.15^*
注： P < 0.05，*P < 0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 小学生PA、SB组合与身体姿态测评合格率的Logistic回归分析

Table 4. Logistic regression analysis of PA, SB combination and qualified rate of body posture assessment

指标	HSB					LSB
指标	人数	合格人数	合格率/%	OR值(OR值95%CI)	P值	人数	合格人数	合格率/%	OR值(OR值95%CI)	P值
LPA	61	5	8.20	1.00		23	8	34.78	1.71(1.41~2.74)	0.02
MPA	30	4	13.33	1.28(0.92~1.86)	0.72	33	12	36.36	2.04(1.58~3.32)	0.02
HPA	32	7	21.88	1.85(1.38~2.86)	< 0.01	27	13	48.15	2.12(1.46~3.37)	< 0.01

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)

[1]	李立, 陈玉娟, 贾富池, 等. 石家庄市小学生不良体态现状[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(9): 1416-1418. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.09.041 LI L, CHEN Y J, JIA F C, et al. Current status of bad posture of primary school students in Shijiazhuang[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(9): 1416-1418. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.09.041
[2]	梁思雨, 杨光, 赵洪波. 体医融合视域下青少年身体姿态健康促进研究[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报, 2021, 40(4): 8-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYTB202104002.htm LIANG S Y, YANG G, ZHAO H B. Health promotion of adolescent body posture from the perspective of integration of sports and medical care[J]. J Shenyang Sport Univ, 2021, 40(4): 8-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYTB202104002.htm
[3]	盛俊龙. 北京市儿童青少年身体姿态现状及测试方法的研究[D]. 北京: 北京体育大学, 2019. SHENG J L. Research on the status quo and testing methods of physical posture of children and adolescents in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Sport University, 2019.
[4]	YANG L, LU X H, YAN B, et al. Prevalence of abnormal body posture among Chinese children and adolescents: a large population-based cross-sectional study[J]. Spine J, 2020, 9(1): 1-5.
[5]	MACIAŁCZYK-PAPROCKA K, STAWIÑSKA-WITOSZYÑSKA B, KOTWICKI T, et al. Prevalence of incorrect body posture in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2017, 176 (5): 563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2873-4
[6]	甄志平, 李晗冉, 蓝一青, 等. 北京市不同体态儿童体质发育特征研究[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2020, 43(10): 68-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJTD202010007.htm ZHEN Z P, LI H R, LAN Y Q, et al. Evaluation of physical development characteristics of children with different postures in Beijing from the perspective of the integration of sports and education[J]. J Beijing Sport Univ, 2020, 43(10): 68-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJTD202010007.htm
[7]	王富百慧, 李雅倩, 郭晓丹, 等. 久坐时间、身体活动与青少年身体姿态异常[J]. 中国青年研究, 2021(6): 5-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGQL202106002.htm WANG F B H, LI Y Q, GUO X D, et al. Study on the relationship between sedentary time, physical activity and abnormal body posture in children and adolescents[J]. Chin Youth Stud, 2021(6): 5-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGQL202106002.htm
[8]	WOUTERS M, EVENHUIS H M, HILGENKAMP T I M. Physical activity levels of children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe intellectual disability[J]. J Appl Res Intellect, 2018, 32(1): 131-142.
[9]	DINA G, VAHIDEH T, AZIZEH F K, et al. Faulty posture: prevalence and its relationship with body mass index and physical activity among female adolescents[J]. Biomed Hum Kinet, 2020, 12(1): 25-33. doi: 10.2478/bhk-2020-0004
[10]	亓德云, 李丽平, 江艳微, 等. 上海市虹口区儿童青少年脊柱弯曲异常现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(3): 444-447, 453. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.03.030 QI D Y, LI L P, JIANG Y W, et al. Abnormal spinal curvature and influencing factors in children and adolescents in Hongkou District, Shanghai[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(3): 444-447, 453. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.03.030
[11]	FORTIN C, FELDMAN D E, CHERIET F, et al. Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2011, 33(5): 367383.
[12]	体育总局关于批准发布《儿童青少年身体姿态测试指标与方法》行业标准的公告[A/OL]. (2022-02-21)[2022-05-15]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/jjs/n5032/c24032702/content.html. General Administration of Sports of approval, issued the children body posture test indicators and methods, the industry standard announcement[A/OL]. (2022-02-21)[2022-05-15]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/jjs/n5032/c24032702/content.html.
[13]	刘阳. 基于加速度计的身体活动测量研究前沿[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2016, 39(8): 66-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJTD201608012.htm LIU Y. Research progress of physical activity assessments based on accelerometers[J]. J Beijing Sport Univ, 2016, 39(8): 66-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJTD201608012.htm
[14]	JORDAN A, JAMES F, TERRY L, et al. Interactions between psychosocial and built environment factors in explaining older adults' physical activity[J]. Prev Med, 2012, 54(1): 68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.004
[15]	NORTON K, NORTON L, SADGROVE D. Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology[J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2010, 13(5): 496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.008
[16]	张长皓, 许巍, 申昆玲. 世界卫生组织关于儿童身体活动和久坐行为指南解读[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2021, 36(17): 1281-1284. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210312-00296 ZHANG C H, XU W, SHEN K L. Interpretation of World Health Organization guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior in children[J]. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2021, 36(17): 1281-1284. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210312-00296
[17]	李海燕, 陈佩杰, 庄洁. 儿童休闲活动调查问卷修订与信效度评价[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2011, 32 (3): 268-270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201103008.htm LI H Y, CHEN P J, ZHUANG J. Revision and reliability validity assessment of Children's Leisure Activities Study Survey[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2011, 32 (3): 268-270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201103008.htm
[18]	BORODULIN K, KÄRKI A, LAATIKAINEN T, et al. Daily sedentary time and risk of cardiovascular disease: the national FINRISK 2002 Study[J]. J Phys Act Health, 2015, 12(7): 904-908. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0364
[19]	国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 人群健康监测人体测量方法: WS/T 424-2013[S]. 2013-10-01. National Health and Family Planning Commission of PRC. Anthropometric measurements method in health surveillance: WS/T 424-2013[S]. 2013-10-01.
[20]	国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 学龄儿童青少年超重与肥胖筛查: WS/T 586-2018[S]. 2018-08-01. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the PRC. Screening for overweight and obesity among school-age children and adolescents: WS/T 586-2018[S]. 2018-08-01.
[21]	RUSEK W, BARAN J, LESZCZAK J, et al. Changes in children's body composition and posture during puberty growth[J]. Children, 2021, 8(4): 288. doi: 10.3390/children8040288
[22]	KLOSTERMANN I, KIRSCHNECK C, LIPPOLD C, et al. Relationship between back posture and early orthodontic treatment in children[J]. Head Face Med, 2021, 17(1): 4. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00255-5
[23]	陈玉娟, 李立, 杨惠玲, 等. 石家庄儿童脊柱侧弯现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(11): 1674-1678. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.11.017 CHEN Y J, LI L, YANG H L, et al. Current status and influencing factors of scoliosis of children in Shijiazhuang[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(11): 1674-1678. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.11.017
[24]	周誉, 冯强. 青少年身体姿态异常综合干预效果研究[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(12): 1882-1885. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.12.029 ZHOU Y, FENG Q. Effectiveness of a school-based comprehensive intervention on abnormal body posture of adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(12): 1882-1885. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.12.029
[25]	DAVE B R, KRISHNAN A, RAI R R, et al. The effect of head loading on cervical spine in manual laborers[J]. Asian Spine J, 2020, 15(1): 17-22.
[26]	聂雄志. 运动康复疗法对高低肩的治疗[J]. 当代体育科技, 2018, 8(25): 223-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYKJ201825133.htm NIE X Z. The treatment of high and low shoulders by sports rehabilitation therapy[J]. Contemp Sports Technol, 2018, 8(25): 223-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYKJ201825133.htm
[27]	RUSSELL D, CHASE J D. The social context of sedentary behaviors and their relationships with health in later life[J]. J Aging Phys Act, 2019, 27(4): 797-806.
[28]	程斌, 李锋涛, 宋金辉. 西安市25 725名中小学生脊柱侧弯患病率调查[J]. 中国临床康复, 2006, 10(8): 8-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKF200608003.htm CHENG B, LI F T, SONG J H. Survey on prevalence rate of scoliosis in 25 725 students of middle school and elementary school in Xi'an City[J]. Chin J Clin Rehabil, 2006, 10(8): 8-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKF200608003.htm
[29]	叶燕霞, 林家仕, 郑磊石. 睡眠、工作久坐、体力活动与成年人慢性疾病关系[J]. 体育科学研究, 2021, 25(4): 53-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYKY202104010.htm YE Y X, LIN J S, ZHENG L S. A study on the relationship between sleep, sedentary behavior and physical activity and chronic diseases in adults[J]. Chin Sport Sci, 2021, 25(4): 53-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYKY202104010.htm
[30]	SCHEMBRI E L, HEINZ A, SAMUEL R. Does physical activity moderate the influence of sedentary behavior on health in young people?[J]. Med Sci Sport Exer, 2021, 53(8): 223-240.
[31]	GOPINATH B, HARDY L L, BAUR L A, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors and health-related quality of life in adolescents[J]. Pediatrics, 2012, 130(1): 167-174. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3637
[32]	KIMBERLY R, BONNIE G, CLAUDIA R, et al. Correlates of physical activity and sedentary behaviors among overweight Hispanic school-aged children[J]. J Pediatr Nurs, 2018, 40(1): 1-6.
[33]	CHANG Z Y, LEI W. A study on the relationship between physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep duration in preschool children[J]. Front Public Health, 2021, 9(4): 618-926.
[34]	KIM Y, KENYON J, BILLINGSLEY H, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors as predictors for all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2021, 53(8 Suppl 1): 191.