大学生直觉饮食与自测健康的关联

杜亚坦; 高芹; 郝丽萍

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.020

大学生直觉饮食与自测健康的关联

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.020

杜亚坦^{1, 2},
高芹^3, ,,
郝丽萍²

1.
湖北大学医院公共卫生科，武汉 430062
2.
华中科技大学公共卫生学院营养与食品卫生学系
3.
济宁医学院公共卫生学院

详细信息

作者简介:
杜亚坦(1996-)，女，河南南阳人，硕士，公共卫生医师，主要研究方向为青少年营养与健康，中老年常见病监测与干预

通讯作者:
高芹，E-mail: gqnutr@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G647.8 R179 R193
计量
- 文章访问数: 518
- HTML全文浏览量: 216
- PDF下载量: 43
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-08
- 修回日期: 2022-03-11
- 网络出版日期: 2022-07-27
- 刊出日期: 2022-07-25

Correlation between intuitive eating and self-rated health among college students

DU Yatan^{1, 2},
GAO Qin^{3
, ,},
HAO Liping²

1.
Department of Public Health Hospital of Hubei University, Wuhan(430062), China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解国内大学生直觉饮食量表(IES-2)和自测健康评定量表(SRHMS V1.0)得分现状及相关性，为改善大学生健康提供科学建议。方法采用整群随机抽样方法，于2019年7—12月从中国8所大学抽取542名大学生进行线上问卷调查。校正混杂后采用多元线性回归分析直觉饮食水平对自测健康状况的影响。结果大学生SRHMS V 1.0得分为(69.84±10.28)分，生理自测健康(PSH)、心理自测健康(MSH)和社会自测健康(SSH)得分分别为(78.50±10.39)(61.86±14.53)(67.54±14.71)分。校正混杂因素后，IES-2得分与SRHMS V 1.0、PSH、MSH和SSH呈正相关(β值分别为6.46，5.00，10.15，3.90，P值均 < 0.05)；以身体而非情绪原因进食得分提高与SRHMS V 1.0、PSH和MSH均呈正相关(β值分别为2.47，2.30，4.71，P值均 < 0.05)；依赖饥饿感和饱腹感暗示进食维度得分与SRHMS V 1.0、PSH、MSH和SSH均呈正相关(β值分别为2.44，1.69，2.71，3.16，P值均 < 0.05)；身体—食物选择一致性维度得分与SRHMS V1.0、PSH、MSH和SSH均呈正相关(β值分别为3.71，2.53，4.68，4.17，P值均 < 0.05)。结论直觉饮食水平提高对改善整体健康具有积极作用，尤其是心理健康。当存在生理、心理或社会问题时，应避免情绪化进食，培养依赖饥饿感和饱腹感进食习惯，进食富含营养且满足身体需求的食物。
- 饮食习惯 /
- 问卷调查 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To investigate average score and correlation of IES-2 and Self-rated Health Measurement Scales V1.0 (SRHMS V1.0) among Chinese college students, so as to provide a scientific reference for health promotion of college students. Methods A random cluster sampling method was applied to conduct an online questionnaire survey from July to December 2019 among 542 college students from 8 universities. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the association of intuitive diet level on self-reported health status after adjusting for confounding factors. Results The average scores of SRHMS V1.0 was (69.84±10.28), and the mean scores of physical self-rated health (PSH), mental self-rated health (MSH) and social self-rated health (SSH) sub-scale were(78.50±10.39)(61.86±14.53)(67.54±14.71), respectively. After adjusting for confounders, the β coefficient of IES-2 and SRHMS V1.0, PSH, MSH and SSH were 6.46, 5.00, 10.15 and 3.90 (P < 0.05). Higher level of EPR had positive effects on SRHMS V1.0, PSH and MSH (β=2.47, 2.30, 4.71, P < 0.05). Higher level of RHSC had positive effects on SRHMS V1.0, PSH, MSH and SSH(β=2.44, 1.69, 2.71, 3.16, P < 0.05).Higher level of B-FCC had positive effects on SRHMS V1.0, PSH, MSH and SSH(β=3.71, 2.53, 4.68, 4.17, P < 0.05). Conclusion The intuitive eating has a positive effect on overall health, especially on mental health. College students should avoid emotional eating, and eat in response to hunger and satiety signals as well as eat healthy food to meet physical needs when facing physical, mental and social problems.
- Food habits /
- Questionnaires /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同社会人口学特征大学生SRHMS V 1.0总分及分量表得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of total score and subscale scores of SRHMS V1.0 for college students with different socio-demographic characteristics(x±s)

人口统计学指标	选项	人数	统计值	SRHMS V 1.0总分	生理自测健康	心理自测健康	社会自测健康
性别	男	220		69.78±10.17	78.38±10.80	62.35±14.64	66.87±15.09
	女	322		69.88±10.37	78.58±10.11	61.53±14.46	68.00±14.45
			t值	-0.12	-0.23	0.65	-0.88
			P值	0.91	0.82	0.52	0.38
年龄/岁	< 25	489		69.50±10.27	78.24±10.34	61.40±14.57	67.25±14.69
	≥25	53		72.98±9.96	80.93±10.62	66.18±13.52	70.20±14.70
			t值	-2.35	-1.80	-2.28	-1.39
			P值	0.02	0.07	0.02	0.17
BMI等级	偏瘦	93		69.08±10.31	77.13±9.71	60.93±13.93	67.85±14.29
	正常	388		69.95±10.35	78.69±10.54	62.21±14.53	67.25±14.79
	超重/肥胖	61		70.28±9.85	79.36±10.40	61.07±15.53	68.93±14.93
			F值	0.33	1.08	0.39	0.37
			P值	0.72	0.34	0.68	0.69
民族	汉族	466		69.60±10.11	78.49±10.49	61.53±4.11	67.10±4.67
	少数民族	76		71.30±11.24	78.55±9.77	63.92±6.81	70.25±4.77
			t值	-1.34	-0.05	-1.33	-1.74
			P值	0.18	0.96	0.18	0.08
专业	医学	269		71.07±10.54	79.01±11.44	63.27±14.58	69.58±14.52
	非医学	273		68.63±9.89	78.00±9.22	60.4±14.36	65.53±14.64
			t值	2.79	1.14	2.25	3.23
			P值	0.01	0.25	0.03	< 0.01
独生子女	是	220		69.96±10.08	78.38±9.65	61.67±14.63	68.41±15.35
	否	322		69.76±10.43	78.58±10.87	62.00±14.47	66.95±14.24
			t值	0.23	-0.23	-0.25	1.14
			P值	0.82	0.82	0.80	0.26
户籍	城镇	302		70.92±10.15	79.07±9.54	62.92±4.89	69.36±14.55
	农村	240		68.49±10.31	77.78±11.34	60.54±3.98	65.25±14.61
			t值	2.72	1.44	1.90	3.26
			P值	0.01	0.15	0.06	< 0.01
早产	是	44		69.64±10.28	80.88±8.43	57.89±13.21	68.39±14.99
	否	498		69.86±10.29	78.29±10.52	62.22±14.60	67.46±14.69
			t值	-0.14	1.59	-1.90	0.40
			P值	0.89	0.11	0.06	0.69
分娩方式	顺产	453		70.08±10.17	78.59±10.64	62.31±14.14	67.75±14.54
	剖宫产	89		68.61±10.81	78.07±9.01	59.60±16.24	66.48±15.57
			t值	1.23	0.43	1.62	0.74
			P值	0.22	0.67	0.11	0.46
胎次	1	374		69.81±10.07	78.80±9.39	61.60±14.70	67.32±14.78
	≥2	168		69.91±10.76	77.83±12.32	62.45±14.15	68.03±14.56
			t值	-0.11	1.02	-0.63	-0.52
			P值	0.91	0.31	0.53	0.60
父母人均月收入/元	< 3 000	145		69.24±11.17	78.11±12.30	61.56±15.67	66.26±14.42
	3 000~4 999	232		69.46±9.90	78.42±9.85	61.61±14.04	66.57±15.23
	5 000~9 999	116		69.47±9.71	77.99±9.37	60.61±13.77	68.48±13.33
	≥10 000	49		74.30±9.83	81.25±8.72	66.91±14.43	73.69±14.90
			F值	3.44	1.31	2.32	3.77
			P值	0.02	0.27	0.07	0.01
父母最高文化程度	初中及以下	186		68.66±10.42	77.86±11.91	60.93±14.39	65.29±14.55
	高中/中专	166		69.80±10.21	78.65±10.36	61.53±13.95	67.62±14.77
	大专	68		69.31±9.88	78.55±7.69	60.33±14.83	67.43±14.02
	本科及以上	122		71.99±10.16	79.25±9.23	64.61±15.14	70.94±14.76
			F值	2.68	0.46	2.00	3.68
			P值	0.05	0.71	0.11	0.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 大学生中文版ISE-2得分对SRHMS V 1.0及各分量表得分的多元线性回归分析(n=542)

Table 2. Multiple linear regression analysis of ISE-2 scores on the scale and subscale scores of SRHMS V 1.0 among college students(n=542)

因变量	自变量	标准误	B值	t值	P值	β值(β值95%CI)
SRHMS V 1.0	IES-2	7.52	0.23	5.27	< 0.01	6.46 (4.05~8.86)
	UPE	0.76	-0.07	-1.59	0.11	-1.20 (-2.69~0.28)
	EPR	0.64	0.17	3.86	< 0.01	2.47 (1.22~3.73)
	RHSC	0.66	0.16	3.69	< 0.01	2.44 (1.14~3.74)
	B-FCC	0.62	0.25	5.97	< 0.01	3.71 (2.49~4.93)
PSH	IES-2	1.27	0.17	3.95	< 0.01	5.00 (2.51~7.48)
	UPE	0.77	-0.60	-1.45	0.15	-1.12 (-2.64~0.40)
	EPR	0.66	0.15	3.51	< 0.01	2.30 (1.10~3.59)
	RHSC	0.68	0.11	2.49	0.01	1.69 (0.36~3.03)
	B-FCC	0.65	0.17	3.91	< 0.01	2.53 (1.26~3.79)
MSH	IES-2	1.72	0.25	5.90	< 0.01	10.15 (6.77~13.54)
	UPE	1.07	-0.05	-1.07	0.28	-1.15 (-3.25~0.96)
	EPR	0.90	0.23	5.26	< 0.01	4.71 (2.95~6.47)
	RHSC	0.94	0.13	2.88	< 0.01	2.71 (0.86~4.55)
	B-FCC	0.88	0.23	5.30	< 0.01	4.68 (2.95~6.42)
SSH	IES-2	1.78	0.10	2.19	0.03	3.90 (0.41~7.40)
	UPE	1.08	-0.06	-1.28	0.20	-1.38 (-3.50~0.74)
	EPR	0.92	0.00	-0.81	0.93	-0.08 (-1.90~1.74)
	RHSC	0.94	0.14	3.35	< 0.01	3.16 (1.30~5.01)
	B-FCC	0.90	0.20	4.66	< 0.01	4.17 (2.41~5.92)
注：校正了大学生年龄、性别、BMI等级、专业、户籍、父母人均月收入、父母最高文化程度、早产、分娩方式。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	许军, 谭剑, 王以彭, 等. 自测健康评定量表修订版(SRHMS V 1.0)的考评[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2003, 64(5): 301-305. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2003.05.004 XU J, TAN J, WANG Y P, et al. Evaluation of the Self-Rated Health Measurement Scale-the Revised Version 1.0[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2003, 64 (5): 301-305. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2003.05.004
[2]	李小玲, 刘泽涵. 西部地区某医学院学生健康现状研究[J]. 青岛大学医学院学报, 2014, 50(2): 180-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BATE201402036.htm LI X L, LIU Z H. The current health situation of students at a medical college in western area of China[J]. Acta Academiae Med Qingdao Univ, 2014, 50(2): 180-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BATE201402036.htm
[3]	杨秀兰, 王婉露, 吴萌, 等. 大学生自测健康状况及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(36): 4476-4481. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.672 YANG X L, WANG W L, WU M, et al. Self-rated health status and influencing factors in college students[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2019, 22(36): 4476-4481. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.672
[4]	RALSTON P A, WICKRAMA K K A S, COCCIA C C, et al. Health for hearts united longitudinal trial: improving dietary behaviors in older African Americans[J]. Am J Prev Med, 2020, 58(3): 361-369. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.024
[5]	刘娟. 重庆师范大学学生饮食行为与健康调查分析[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 27(4): 94-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSF201004024.htm LIU J. Investigation and analysis on dietary behaviors and health of students in Chongqing Normal Univ[J]. J Chongqing Normal Univer(Nat Sci Edit), 2010, 27(4): 94-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSF201004024.htm
[6]	CADENA-SCHLAM L, LOPEZ-GUIMERA G. Intuitive eating: an emerging approach to eating behavior[J]. Nutr Hosp, 2014, 31(3): 995-1002.
[7]	马先, 郭蕾蕾, 张林. 直觉饮食量表中文版在大学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2019, 15 (8): 751-754. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2019.08.015 MA X, GUO L L, ZHANG L. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of intuitive eating scale in college students[J]. Chin J Behav Med Br Sci, 2019, 15(8): 751-754. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2019.08.015
[8]	扈娜, 孟令弟, 刘堃. 脑卒中后康复信心测量问卷中文版信效度研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2018, 27(3): 277-280. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.03.018 HU N, MENG L D, LIU K. Reliability and validity of Rehabilitation Confidence Scale for Stroke Patients[J]. Chin J Behav Med Br Sci, 2018, 27(3) : 277-280. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.03.018
[9]	中国肥胖问题工作组数据汇总分析协作组. 我国成人体重指数和腰围对相关疾病危险因素异常的预测价值: 适宜体重指数和腰围切点的研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2002, 38(1): 10-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHLX200201002.htm China Working Group on Obesity Data Collection and Analysis Collaboration Group. The predictive value of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (w/w) on the abnormality of risk factors of related diseases in adults of our country: a study on the cut-off point of appropriate BMI and w/w[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2002, 38(1): 10-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHLX200201002.htm
[10]	严发萍, 王红雨, 邹兵, 等. 某医学院学生亚健康状况与锻炼行为的关系研究[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(5): 656-659. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG201505033.htm YAN F P, WANG H Y, ZOU B, et al. Relationship between sub-health and physical exercise behavior in medical college students[J]. J Bengbu Med Coll, 2015, 40(5): 656-659. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG201505033.htm
[11]	夏聪, 许军, 杨枭楠, 等. 自测健康评定量表评价广州市城镇居民健康状况的信效度研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(1): 29-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWT201801008.htm XIA C, XU J, YANG X N, et al. Reliability and Validity of Self-rated Health Measurement Scale Version in evaluating the health status of urban residents in Guangzhou[J]. Chin J Health Stat, 2018, 35(1): 29-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWT201801008.htm
[12]	刘敏. 大学生体质水平与社会健康的关系研究[J]. 运动, 2015, 17(24): 44-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YDAA201524025.htm LIU M. Relationship between physical fitness level and social health in college students[J]. Exercise, 2015, 17(24): 44-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YDAA201524025.htm
[13]	罗梦君. 大学生心理健康与社会适应性研究[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2013. LUO M J. Research on college students' psychological health and social adaptability[D]. Xianyang: Northwest Agriculture Forestry University, 2013.
[14]	CRAVEN M P, FEKETE E M. Weight-related shame and guilt, intuitive eating, and binge eating in female college students[J]. Eat Behav, 2019, 7(33): 44-48.
[15]	黄舒. 试论大学生身体素质下降原因及分析: 以吉林动画学院为例[J]. 当代体育科技, 2018, 8(22): 253-254. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYKJ201822142.htm HUANG S. The causes and analysis of the decline of college students' physical quality: taking Jilin Animation University as an example[J]. Contemp Sports Technol, 2018, 8(22): 253-254. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYKJ201822142.htm
[16]	王晓峰, 王祥全. 大学生人口身体素质变动及其问题成因分析[J]. 人口学刊, 2018, 40(2): 86-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKXK201802007.htm WANG X F, WANG X Q. An analysis on the change and causes of physical quality in college students[J]. Popul J, 2018, 40(2): 86-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKXK201802007.htm
[17]	OUTLAND L. Intuitive eating: a holistic approach to weight control[J]. Holist Nurs Pract, 2010, 24(1): 35-43.
[18]	刘亚慧. 大学生人际困扰与心理健康相关研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2014. LIU Y H. Investigation of the relationship of college students' interpersonal trouble and mental health[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2014.
[19]	兰天. 大学生时间管理、心理资本及社会支持与学业倦怠的关系研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2017. LAN T. Relationship of time management, psychological capital and social support and academic burnout of college students[D]. Harbin: Heilongjiang University, 2017.
[20]	COLE R E, HORACEK T. Effectiveness of the "My Body Knows When" intuitive-eating pilot program[J]. Am J Health Behav, 2010, 34(3): 286-297.
[21]	鲁婷婷, 闫振龙, 王云冰, 等. 大学生社会健康比较研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 37(2): 107-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAJD201702015.htm LU T T, YAN Z L, WANG Y B, et al. A Comparative study of college students social health[J]. J Xi'an Jiaotong Univ(Soc Sci), 2017, 37(2): 107-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAJD201702015.htm