大学生网约性行为与感觉寻求危险行为的关系

胡春梅; 何玲玲; 金雪琪

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.06.018

大学生网约性行为与感觉寻求危险行为的关系

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.06.018

重庆文理学院情绪和心理健康实验室，重庆 402160

基金项目:

教育部人文社会科学研究项目 20XJA190002

永川区社会事业和民生保障项目 Ycstc2020cc1301

永川区科技局制度创新项目 2021YC-zdcx20010

详细信息

作者简介:
胡春梅(1977-)，女，四川广汉人，硕士，教授，主要研究方向为学校心理健康与社会心理

通讯作者:
何玲玲，E-mail: 58545739@qq.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G647.8 G444 B844.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 571
- HTML全文浏览量: 205
- PDF下载量: 62
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-20
- 修回日期: 2022-04-03
- 网络出版日期: 2022-06-23
- 刊出日期: 2022-06-25

Relationship between online partner-seeking sexual behavior and sensation-seeking risk behaviors among college students

Laboratory of Emotion and Mental Health, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing (402160), China

摘要

摘要: 目的调查大学生网约性行为现状及与感觉寻求、危险行为的关系，为高校开展学生性教育提供参考。方法采用方便抽样方法，于2021年9—10月在重庆市某高校抽取1 923名大学生完成网约性行为、感觉寻求和危险行为的问卷调查。结果大学生性行为发生率为26.7%，其中，网约性行为发生率为12.3%。不同性别大学生网约性行为发生率差异无统计学意义(χ²=1.25，P>0.05)；不同年级，不同赌博、饮酒、网络成瘾倾向大学生网约性行为发生率差异均有统计学意义(χ²值分别为9.40，3.29，19.63，3.66，P值均 < 0.05)，大一年级(9.1%)、不赌博(12.0%)、饮酒(8.4%)、无网络成瘾倾向学生(11.8%)低于大二和大三年级(14.4%，13.1%)、赌博(19.7%)、不饮酒(15.1%)、有网络成瘾倾向学生(16.6%)。多因素Logistic回归分析表明，大学生饮酒(OR=0.45，95%CI=0.33~0.62)与网约性行为发生呈负性相关，感觉寻求(OR=1.08，95%CI=1.03~1.13)、赌博(OR=2.15，95%CI=1.19~3.88)与网约性行为发生呈正性相关(P值均 < 0.05)。结论大学生网约性行为发生率不容忽视。高校应引导学生科学认识网约性行为危害，不寻求其带来的新异刺激感，避免与赌博行为聚集出现。
- 因特网 /
- 性行为 /
- 危险行为 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To investigate relationship between online partner-seeking sexual behavior and sensation seeking risk behaviors among college students, and to provide suggestions on college sex education. Methods Using convenience sampling, a self-administered questionnair survey was administered among 1 923 students in one college in Chongqing between September and October in 2021, regarding online partner-seeking sexual behavior, sensation seeking and risk behaviors. Results About 26.7% of participants reported having sexual behavior, and 12.3% students having online partner-seeking sexual behavior. There were no significant sex differences in online partner-seeking sexual behavior (χ²=1.25, P>0.05); partner-seeking sexual behavior varied by grade, gambling, alcohol drinking and internet addiction tendency(χ²=9.40, 3.29, 19.63 and 3.66, P < 0.05), which was higer among college students in grade one(9.1%), no gambling habit(12.0%), drinking habit(8.4%), and having no inclination to Internet addiction (11.8%) compared with those of grade 2 and 3(14.4%, 13.1%), gambling habit(19.7%), no drinking habit(15.1%) and having inclination to Internet addiction (16.6%). The results of multivariate Logistic regression showed that alcohol drinking (OR=0.45, 95%CI=0.33-0.62) was negatively associated with online partner-seeking sexual behavior, sensation seeking (OR=1.08, 95%CI=1.03-1.13) and gambling (OR=2.15, 95%CI=1.19-3.88) were positively associated with online partner-seeking sexual behavior of college students(P < 0.05). Conclusion Colleges should pay attention to the occurrence of online partner-seeking sexual behavior, provide guidance for recognition of adverse consequences of sensation-seeking behavior, and to avoid the clustering of online partner-seeking sexual behavior with gambling behaviors.
- Internet /
- Sexual behavior /
- Dangerous behavior /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同组别大学生网约性行为发生率比较

Table 1. Comparison in the incidence of online partner-seeking sexual behavior among college students with different characteristics

组别	选项	人数	网约性行为人数	χ²值	P值
性别	男	909	104(11.4)	1.25	0.27
	女	1 014	133(13.1)
年级	一	617	56(9.1)	9.40	< 0.01
	二	763	110(14.4)
	三	543	71(13.1)
生源地	农村	1 251	151(12.1)	0.21	0.64
	城市	672	86(12.8)
留守	是	600	67(11.2)	1.08	0.30
	否	1 323	170(12.8)
吸烟	是	327	43(13.1)	0.25	0.62
	否	1 596	194(12.2)
赌博	是	86	17(19.7)	4.53	0.03
	否	1 837	221(12.0)
饮酒	是	799	67(8.4)	19.63	< 0.01
	否	1 124	170(15.1)
网络成瘾	有	235	39(16.6)	4.40	0.04
倾向	无	1 688	199(11.8)
注： ()内数字为发生率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 大学生网约性行为影响因素的Logistic回归分析(n=1 923)

Table 2. Logistic regression model analysis of influencing factors of college students' online partner-seeking sexual behavior(n=1 923)

自变量		β值	标准误	Wald χ²值	P值	OR值(OR值95%CI)
年级	二	0.42	0.18	5.69	0.02	1.52(1.08~2.16)
	三	0.32	0.19	2.77	0.10	1.38(0.95~2.00)
赌博		0.76	0.30	6.38	0.01	2.15(1.19~3.88)
饮酒		-0.80	0.16	24.71	< 0.01	0.45(0.33~0.62)
网络成瘾		0.20	0.20	1.04	0.31	1.23(0.83~1.81)
倾向
感觉寻求		0.08	0.02	10.44	< 0.01	1.08(1.03~1.13)

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	王莹, 刘慧君. 网约性行为态度量表编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(2): 256-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW202102014.htm WANG Y, LIU H J. Development and reliability and validity evaluation of an online partner seeking sexual behavior attitude scale[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2021, 37(2): 256-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW202102014.htm
[2]	张冬, 周宁, 盖青, 等. 某高校大学生网约性行为发生情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2021, 27(4): 378-381. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBYA202104017.htm ZHANG D, ZHOU N, GAI Q, et al. Occurrence and influencing factors of hookup on APP among college students[J]. Chin J AIDS STD, 2021, 27(4): 378-381. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBYA202104017.htm
[3]	中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC). 第45次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL]. (2020-04-28)[2022-01-10]. http://www.cac.gov.cn/2020-04/28/c_1589619527364495.htm. China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). The 45th China statistical report on internet development[EB/OL]. (2020-04-28)[2022-01-10]. http://www.cac.gov.cn/2020-04/28/c_1589619527364495.htm
[4]	郭佩佩, 姜茂敏, 于海燕, 等. 感觉寻求对上海市大学生高危性行为的影响[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志, 2020, 34(9): 1044-1049. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBFX202009013.htm GUO P P, JIANG M M, YU H Y, et al. Impact of fear of missing out on high-risk sexual behaviors among college students in Shanghai[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2020, 34(9): 1044-1049. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBFX202009013.htm
[5]	何玲玲, 林佳丽, 娜仁, 等. 重庆市某高校大学生性行为与感觉寻求的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1738-1741. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202111029.htm HE L L, LIN J L, NA R, et al. Relationship between sexual behavior and sensation seeking of students in a university in Chongqing[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2021, 29(11): 1738-1741. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL202111029.htm
[6]	胡春梅, 王蕾, 王亚欣. 大学生性行为和相关健康危险行为的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(11): 1644-1646. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.11.012 HU C M, WANG L, WANG Y X. Relationship between sexual behavior and health-risk behavior of college students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(11): 1644-1646. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.11.012
[7]	SARVER D E, MCCART M R, SHERDOW A J, et al. ADHD and risky sexual behavior in adolescent: conduct problems and substance use as mediators of risk[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2014, 55(12): 1345-1353. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12249
[8]	季成叶. 中国青少年健康相关/危险行为调查综合报告[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2007: 44-45. JI C Y. Comprehensive report of the Chinese adolescent health related/risk behavior survey[M]. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2007: 44-45.
[9]	GRACE K, ANNE E S, THOMAS J M, et al. Pubertal status, sensation-seeking, impulsivity, and substance use in high-school-aged boys and girls[J]. J Addict Med, 2013, 7(2): 116-121. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31828230ca
[10]	ZUCKERMAN M, KUHLMAN MD, JOIREMAN J, et al. A comparison of three structural models for personality: the Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1993, 65(4): 757-768. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757
[11]	叶新东. 网络成瘾研究概述[J]. 心理科学, 2004, 27(6): 1446-1448. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.06.044 YE X D. A review of researches on the Internet addiction[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2004, 27(6): 1446-1448. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.06.044
[12]	杨银梅, 沈雅利, 李十月, 等. 中国大陆地区大学生性行为发生情况Meta分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(1): 142-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201801042.htm YANG Y M, SHENG Y L, LI S Y, et al. Occurrence of sexual behavior among college students in mainland China: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2018, 34(1): 142-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201801042.htm
[13]	VELE ZMORO R, NEGY C, LIVIA J. Online sexual activity: cross-national comparison between United States and Peruvian college students[J]. Arch Sex Behav, 2012, 41: 1015-1025. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9862-x
[14]	SHAUGHNESSY K, BYERS E S, WALSH L. Online sexual activity experience of heterosexual students: gender similarities and differences[J]. Arch Sex Behav, 2011, 40: 419-427. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9629-9
[15]	赵科, 高长松, 尹可丽. 大学生性态度与父母教养方式关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(9): 1079-1081. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201109003.htm ZHAO K, GAO C S, YIN K L. Relationship between sexual attitudes and parental rearing styles among college students[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2011, 27(9): 1079-1081. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201109003.htm
[16]	吴晓雪, 孙建乐. 温州市大学生性教育、性观念及性行为状况调查[J]. 医学与社会, 2018, 31(7): 52-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH201807018.htm WU X X, SUN J L. Investigation on sex education, sexual concept and sexual behavior of college students in Wenzhou City[J]. Med Soc, 2018, 31(7): 52-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH201807018.htm
[17]	COUCH D, LIAMPUTTONG P. Online dating and mating: the use of the Internet to meet sexual partners[J]. Qual Health Res, 2008, 18(2): 268-279. doi: 10.1177/1049732307312832
[18]	ZHENG L J, ZHENG Y. Online sexual activity in Mainland China: relationship to sexual sensation seeking and sociosexuality[J]. Comput Hum Behav, 2014, 36: 323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.062
[19]	刘志浩, 廉启国, 卫平民, 等. 南京市大学生健康危险行为聚集模式分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2013, 34(10): 1193-1197. http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201310015 LIU Z H, LIAN Q G, WEI P M, et al. Cluster analysis of health risk behaviors among college students in Nanjing[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2013, 34(10): 1193-1197. http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201310015
[20]	何华敏, 胡春梅, 谢应宽, 等. 青少年感觉寻求人格特质的培养策略探析[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2019(5): 92-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYX201905021.htm HE H M, HU C M, XIE Y K, et al. An analysis of cultivating strategies of adolescent sensation seeking personality traits[J]. J Chin Soc Educ, 2019(5): 92-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYX201905021.htm