Epidemiological characteristics of facial trauma in preschool children in Fuyang City of Anhui Province
-
摘要:
目的 了解安徽阜阳城区3~6岁学龄前儿童面部外伤发生现状及相关影响因素, 为降低学龄前儿童面部外伤提供参考依据。 方法 采取多阶段分层整群抽样方法, 对阜阳市4所幼儿园3~6岁的1 062名学龄前儿童家长进行问卷调查。 结果 共收集面部外伤儿童146例, 学龄前儿童面部外伤报告率为13.7%。男女童之比为1.84∶1, 幼儿园小、中班男生报告率(24.5%, 16.4%)高于女生(13.4%, 9.0%), 差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为6.66, 4.25, P值均 < 0.05)。小班儿童面部外伤(19.4%)发生最多, 且随着年龄增长, 发病人数逐渐降低。跌倒(61.6%)是最常见原因。家庭(55.5%)和幼儿园(26.0%)是发生面部外伤的主要场所, 额部(26.0%)和下颌(21.2%)为主要受伤部位, 单纯皮肤裂伤(81.5%)是主要受伤类型。11:00—13:00(19.9%)及17:00—19:00(27.4%)为面部外伤高发时间; 6—8月(39.7%)为高发月份。单因素分析结果显示, 学龄前儿童面部外伤在性别、班级、家长自诉儿童性格、监护人文化程度和家庭类型方面差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为14.51, 18.84, 39.66, 6.56, 12.31, P值均<0.05)。 结论 学龄前儿童面部外伤报告率较高, 不同性别、班级、性格、家庭类型等发生情况有所差异, 家庭、幼托机构和社会等多方共同干预, 可有效减少学龄前儿童意外伤害发生。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the current situation and related factors of facial trauma in school-age children in urban areas of Fuyang, and to provide basis for child facial trauma prevention. Methods By cluster stratified random sampling method, a questionnaire survey was conducted among parents of school-age children aged 3-6 in four kindergartens in Fuyang City. A total of 1 062 valid questionnaires were included. Results A total of 146 (13.7%) children with facial trauma were included. The ratio of boys to girls was 1.84∶1.In primary and secondary classes in kindergarten, the reporting rate of boys (24.5%, 16.4%) was higher than that of girls (13.4%, 9.0%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.66, 4.25, P < 0.05).The incidence of facial trauma was highest (19.4%) in junior kindergarten class children, which decreased with age. Falls injury(61.6%) was the leading cause of facial trauma. Most of facial trauma occurred in family (55.5%) and kindergarten (26.0%). Forehead (26.0%) and mandible (21.2%) were the main injured body sites. Skin laceration (81.5%) was the main type of injury. Facial trauma mostly occurred at 11:00-13:00(19.9%) and 17:00-19:00(27.4%), during June to August (39.7%). The results of univariate analysis showed that the facial trauma of preschool children was associated with gender, class, parent-rated child temperament, parental education and family type(χ2=14.51, 18.84, 39.66, 6.56, 12.31, P < 0.05). Conclusion Facial trauma in preschool children in Fuyang is common, which varies in gender, class, temperament and family type. -
Key words:
- Face /
- Wounds and injuries /
- Child, preschool /
- Questionnaires
1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 不同组别学龄前儿童面部外伤不同受伤原因分布
Table 1. Composition of different causes of facial trauma in preschool children of different groups
组别 选项 人数 跌倒 交通伤 锐器伤 动物伤 其他 性别 男 90 54(60.0) 13(14.4) 9(10.0) 10(11.1) 4(4.5) 女 56 36(64.3) 8(14.3) 7(12.5) 3(5.3) 2(3.6) 年级 小班 66 46(69.9) 4(6.0) 7(10.6) 6(9.0) 3(4.5) 中班 46 27(58.7) 7(15.2) 5(10.9) 5(10.9) 2(4.3) 大班 34 17(50.0) 10(29.4) 4(11.8) 2(5.9) 1(2.9) 幼儿园 公办 102 59(57.8) 16(15.7) 13(12.8) 9(8.8) 5(4.9) 性质 民办 44 31(70.4) 5(11.4) 3(6.8) 4(9.1) 1(2.3) 注:()内数字为构成比/%。 表 2 学龄前儿童面部外伤相关因素单因素分析
Table 2. Univariate analysis of related factors of facial trauma in preschool children
因素 选项 人数 受伤人数 χ2值 P值 性别 男 565 99(17.5) 14.51 < 0.01 女 497 47(9.5) 班级 小班 341 66(19.4) 18.84 < 0.01 中班 355 46(13.0) 大班 366 34(9.3) 家庭人均月收入 ≥2 000 550 69(12.5) 1.39 0.24 /元 < 2 000 512 77(15.0) 儿童性格 偏外向 558 112(20.1) 39.66 < 0.01 偏内向 504 34(6.7) 家庭人口/人 ≤3 497 65(13.1) 0.35 0.55 >4 565 81(14.3) 监护人文化程度 小学及以下 355 61(17.2) 6.56 0.04 初中等教育 365 49(13.4) 高等教育 342 36(10.5) 家庭类型 农村及打工家庭 526 92(17.5) 12.31 < 0.01 城市家庭 536 54(10.1) 学校类型 公办 717 102(14.2) 0.43 0.51 民办 345 44(12.8) 注:()内数字为报告率/%。 -
[1] 余杏侠, 魏捷, 杨卫泽. 儿童意外伤害482例原因及特点分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(6): 687-689, 696. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO201906029.htmYU X X, WEI J, YANG W Z. Analysis on causes and characteristics of unintentional injuries among children[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2019, 27(6): 687-689, 696. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO201906029.htm [2] LEILEI D, YE P P, HAAGSMA J A, et al. The burden of injury in China, 1990-2017: findings from the global burden of disease study 2017[J]. Lancet Public Health, 2019, 4(9): e449-e461. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30125-2 [3] DAVIES R, HAMMOND D, RIDOUT F, et al. British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons' National Facial Injury Surveys: hard tissue facial injuries presenting to UK emergency dempartments[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 58(2): 152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.11.002 [4] 杜宁, 刘学聪. 1086例儿童口腔颌面部意外伤害的临床特点分析[J]. 现代医学与健康研究, 2020, 4(1): 25-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJD202001011.htmDU N, LIU X C. Clinical characteristics of 1086 children with oral and maxillofacial accidental injuries[J]. Mod Med Health Res, 2020, 4(1): 25-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJD202001011.htm [5] 王炜. 整形外科学[M]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 1999: 526-541.WANG W. Plastic surgery[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang science and Technology Press, 1999: 526-541. [6] 许玉慧. 120例口腔颌面部外伤临床诊治体会[J]. 临床医学, 2016, 29(16): 347-348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZZY200204029.htmXU Y H. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of 120 cases of oral and maxillofacial trauma [J]. Clin Med, 2016, 29(16): 347-348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZZY200204029.htm [7] 王声湧. 关于伤害界定标准的决定中华预防医学会伤害预防与控制分会第一届第五次常委会通过[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2011, 15(1): 9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201101005.htmWANG S Y. The decision on injury definition standard was adopted by the fifth Standing Committee of the first session of injury prevention and control branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association[J]. Chin J Dis Control, 2011, 15(1): 9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201101005.htm [8] 孙孟柯, 杨秀玲, 尹翠艳, 等. 青岛市社区学龄前儿童非故意伤害现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 伤害医学, 2020, 9(4): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202004001.htmSUN M K, YANG X L, YIN C Y, et al. Analysis on the status and influencing factors of unintentional injuries of preschool children in the community of Qingdao[J]. Injury Med, 2020, 9 (4): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202004001.htm [9] 吴海霞, 黄兵, 康正琴, 等. 南京市浦口区学龄前儿童伤害追踪调查及其分析[J]. 伤害医学, 2019, 8(2): 34-39.WU H X, HUANG B, KANG Z Q, et al. Investigation on kindergarten children's injury in pukou district of nanjing and analysis of influencing factors[J]. Injury Med, 2019, 8 (2): 34-39. [10] 周卫国, 蒋耀琴, 管丽娟, 等. 上海市某幼儿园学龄前儿童伤害及家长认知调查[J]. 中国实用医药, 2009, 4(20): 257-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSSA200920204.htmZHOU W G, JIANG Y Q, GUAN L J, et al. Researches about the prevalence of pre-school children's injuries and the status of their parents/guardians'kap in a kindergarten, Shanghai[J]. Chin Pract Med, 2009, 4(20): 257-259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSSA200920204.htm [11] 史晓煜, 马慧颖, 张爱华, 等. 5762例非住院颌面部外伤患者回顾分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(3): 285-288. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKQ201903031.htmSHI X Y, MA H Y, ZHANG A H, et al. Retrospective analysis of 5762 out-patients with maxillofacial trauma[J]. Chin J Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 2019, 17(3): 285-288. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKQ201903031.htm [12] 侯瑶, 孔楠, 常开朝, 等. 昆明市儿童意外伤害的相关因素和干预策略分析[J]. 医药前沿, 2020, 10(24): 255-256.HOU Y, KONG N, CHANG K C, et al. Analysis on related factors and intervention strategies of children's accidental injury in Kunming[J]. J Front Med, 2020, 10(24): 255-256. [13] 陈雪, 荣峰, 陶磊, 等. 淮北市2009-2011年儿童伤害病例特征分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2016, 37(3): 403-406. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.03.024CHEN X, RONG F, TAO L, et al. Analysis on characteristics of children injured cases during 2009-2011 in Huaibei[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2016, 37(3): 403-406. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.03.024 [14] 郑佳丽, 武卫华. 1507例儿童意外伤害病例特征分析及护理体会[J]. 医药前沿, 2020, 10(30): 171-172.ZHENG J L, WU W H. Characteristic analysis and nursing experience of 1507 cases of accidental injury in children[J]. J Front Med, 2020, 10(30): 171-172. [15] 耳玉亮, 陆治名, 汪媛, 等. 中国2018年伤害监测系统0~5岁儿童伤害病例特征分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(7): 971-975. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.07.004ER Y L, LU Z M, WANG Y, et al. Analysis of the characteristics of injury among children aged 0-5 years: results from Chinese National Injury Surveillance System in 2018[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(7): 971-975. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.07.004 [16] THURBER K, BURGESS L, FALSTER K, et al. Relation of child, caregiver, and environmental characteristics to childhood injury in an urban Aboriginal cohort in New South Wales, Australia[J]. Aust N Z J Public Health, 2018, 42(2): 157-165. [17] 杨海峰, 楼理洋. 2014-2018年杭州市富阳区儿童意外伤害流行病学特征分析[J]. 江苏预防医学, 2020, 31(3): 327-329. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYF202003031.htmYANG H F, LOU L Y. Epidemiological characteristics of accidental injuries among children in Fuyang District, Hangzhou from 2014 to 2018[J]. Jiangsu Prev Med, 2020, 31(3): 327-329. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYF202003031.htm [18] 张乃尊, 傅国武, 梁文玉. 学龄期儿童头面部外伤476例临床分析[J]. 广东医学院学报, 2008, 26(4): 430-431. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDYY200804029.htmZHANG N Z, FU G W, LIANG W Y. Clinical analysis of 476 cases of craniofacial trauma in school-age children[J]. J Guangdong Med College, 2008, 26(4): 430-431. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDYY200804029.htm [19] 赵晓娜, 王润刚, 栗新燕, 等. 内蒙古城区托幼机构学龄前儿童非故意伤害流行特征研究[J]. 伤害医学, 2021, 10(3): 27-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202103007.htmZHAO X N, WANG R G, LI X Y, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of unintentional injuries among preshool children in urban nurseries school in Inner Mongolia[J]. Injury Med, 2021, 10(3): 27-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYD202103007.htm [20] HALL D, TAYLOR R W, JACOBSON A, et al. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus while Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2000, 118(5): 514-525. [21] 郝秀奇, 代涛. 中国基于学校儿童青少年意外伤害综合干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(8): 1206-1209, 1212. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.08.026HAO X Q, DAI T. Meta-regression analysis of the effect of school-based unintentional injury prevention programs for children and adolescents in China[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2018, 39(8): 1206-1209, 1212. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2018.08.026 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 613
- HTML全文浏览量: 253
- PDF下载量: 23
- 被引次数: 0