Effects of proprioception training combined with core stability training on balance ability of college students
-
摘要:
目的 探讨本体感觉联合核心稳定性训练对大学生静态平衡能力、动态平衡能力的影响, 为研究身体平衡能力及预防运动损伤提供实验依据。 方法 2019年8月招募山东体育学院112名非体育专业学生, 采用随机数字表法将52例被试分为干预组, 60例为对照组。干预组做本体感觉训练联合核心稳定性训练, 对照组做核心稳定性训练。比较两组被试训练前后的静态、动态平衡能力。 结果 干预组第5和11周静态平衡能力高于干预前(F=2.17, P < 0.05), 分别高出18.31%和47.37%。干预组第11周闭目单足站立能力高于对照组第11周(t=2.25, P < 0.05);训练后干预组第5周外前方向平衡能力提高, 第11周时继续提高, 高于干预组干预前外前方向的平衡能力(F=2.37, P < 0.01), 分别高出12.01%和12.99%;且高于对照组第5和11周。 结论 本体感觉和核心稳定性训练能有效提高大学生静态、动态平衡能力, 且本体感觉训练联合核心稳定性训练的训练效果优于核心稳定性训练。 Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of proprioception combined with core stability training on the static balance ability and dynamic balance ability of college students, and to provide an experimental basis for studying body balance ability and preventing sports injuries. Methods In August 2019, 112 non-sports students from Shandong Institute of Physical Education were recruited, and 52 subjects were selected as the intervention group and 60 as the control group by random number table method. The intervention group was given proprioceptive training combined with core stability training, while the control group was given core stability training. The static and dynamic balance abilities of the two groups of subjects before and after training were compared. Results The static balance ability of the intervention group was higher than that before the intervention (F=2.17, P < 0.05) at the 5th and 11th weeks, which were 18.31% and 47.37% higher, respectively. The ability to stand on one foot with eyes closed at the 11th week in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group at the 11th week(t=2.25, P < 0.05). After training, the equilibrioception of the intervention group was improved, increasingly improved in the 11th week. And compared with that in intervention group in the 5th and 11th week, the ability was also higher than the balance ability of the intervention group before the intervention(F=2.37, P < 0.01), 12.01% and 12.99% higher, respectively. Conclusion Proprioception and core stability training can effectively improve the static and dynamic balance ability of college students, and the training effect of proprioceptive training combined with core stability training is better than that of core stability training. -
表 1 对照组与干预组大学生训练前后核心力量比较(x±s)
Table 1. Comparison of core strength before and after training of college students in the control group and the intervention group(x ±s)
组别 训练前后 人数 统计值 等速躯干肌肉伸展力量强度 等速躯干肌肉屈曲力量强度 相对峰力矩 总功 屈伸肌峰力矩比 相对峰力矩 总功 干预组 训练前 52 323.12±118.91 1 550.45±656.17 78.34±14.75 234.12±53.74 891.32±337.45 训练后 52 398.32±108.23# 1 794.65±503.14# 87.35±11.23# 276.48±61.53# 1 064.22±335.68# t值 3.58 3.40 4.82 2.41 3.52 P值 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 对照组 训练前 60 325.64±121.42 1 552.32±677.62 78.32±26.34 237.68±52.37 892.34±392.33 训练后 60 310.34±114.76 1 652.37±654.75 81.67±28.76 237.64±42.55 947.65±331.32 t值 0.55 1.71 1.13 0.88 1.89 P值 0.21 0.09 0.13 0.21 0.06 注:#表示组间比较P < 0.05。 表 2 对照组与干预组大学生训练前后Biodex3 Pro静态平衡能力比较(x±s)
Table 2. Comparison of the static balance ability of Biodex3 Pro between the control group and the intervention group before and after training(x±s)
组别 训练前后 人数 统计值 压力中心/mm 压力分布/% LFS指数 最大摆渡/cm 线形图面积/cm2 线形图总长度/cm X轴 Y轴 左 右 前 后 干预组 训练前 52 7.49±1.22 51.02±12.37 51.23±2.34 50.47±1.50 57.12±3.45 42.21±4.45 442.12±114.37 4.32±2.41 167.34±38.75 12.84±3.44 训练后 52 6.22±3.21# 49.21±2.44 48.32±2.31 48.75±2.03# 52.17±2.33 40.32±3.47 429.34±126.42# 4.17±1.22# 153.34±28.74# 9.75±4.65# t值 2.67 1.93 0.96 2.11 1.40 1.48 2.05 2.08 2.39 3.14 P值 0.01 0.06 0.83 0.04 0.76 0.53 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.00 对照组 训练前 60 7.41±2.33 52.12±2.51 50.11±2.41 51.23±2.76 55.20±3.17 42.37±1.54 443.21±120.75 4.31±2.14 169.32±40.22 12.33±3.47 训练后 60 6.67±1.65# 51.32±2.42 49.24±2.75 49.22±1.64 53.68±2.31 41.67±3.57 431.32±117.64# 3.93±2.61# 160.71±35.21# 11.84±3.25 t值 2.10 1.57 0.96 0.34 1.02 0.64 2.11 2.15 2.12 1.52 P值 0.04 0.11 0.20 0.32 0.18 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.12 注:#表示组间比较P < 0.05。 表 3 对照组与干预组不同干预阶段动态平衡能力比较(x±s)
Table 3. Comparison of dynamic balance ability between control group and intervention group in different intervention stages(x±s)
组别 时间 统计值 前 外前 外 外后 后 干预组 干预前 79.56±6.02 79.59±5.33 76.13±5.04 78.63±4.83 82.10±6.04 (n=52) 第5周 89.77±7.87 89.15±7.11 86.68±4.83 90.98±5.82 93.63±6.58 第11周 92.35±7.48 89.93±6.55 88.14±7.91 93.05±8.75 97.33±8.87 F值 3.63 1.68 3.55 1.67 3.54 P值 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 对照组 干预前 79.15±5.16 81.07±4.57 75.26±4.54 77.45±4.30 80.69±5.87 (n=60) 第5周 81.23±5.07 82.98±5.78 77.40±4.21 79.57±5.30 81.77±5.32 第11周 81.42±5.10 83.18±5.90 78.73±5.94 81.22±5.08 82.81±5.79 F值 1.52 1.55 1.61 1.50 1.51 P值 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 表 4 对照组与干预组不同干预阶段静态平衡能力比较(x±s)
Table 4. Static balance ability of control group and intervention group at different intervention stages compare(x±s)
组别 时间 统计值 闭目单足站立 单脚前脚掌站 鹤立 干预组 干预前 27.42±13.71 10.97±5.49 13.03±9.76 (n=52) 第5周 32.44±25.53 14.05±19.97 18.08±9.54 第11周 40.41±27.57 19.58±23.29 24.39±20.43 F值 3.52 1.47 1.52 P值 0.00 0.03 0.02 对照组 干预前 28.31±14.15 10.64±5.35 13.87±9.56 (n=60) 第5周 30.51±23.36 11.96±8.74 14.33±6.34 第11周 29.56±27.96 14.35±9.28 16.31±8.24 F值 1.30 1.41 1.38 P值 0.96 0.75 0.89 -
[1] CHILLAKURU C R, JAMBU N, DEEPAK A. A comparison of the proprioception of osteoarthritic knees and post total knee arthroplasty[J]. IJORO, 2017, 3(4): 781-786. [2] MOHAMED A A, JAN Y. Effect of adding proprioceptive exercise to balance training in older adults with diabetes: a systematic review[J]. Curr Diab Rev, 2020, 16(4): 327-339. doi: 10.2174/1573399815666190712200147 [3] ZAREI H, NORASTEH A A. Effects of core stability training program on trunk muscle endurance in deaf children: a preliminary study[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2021, 28: 6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.07.014 [4] SAZDOVA L, LYUBOMIRA. Effect of proprioceptive training exercises on balance in healthy individuals[J]. Proceed Paper, 2019, 11(6): 543-546. [5] 游永豪. 不同人群平衡能力的影响因素研究[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2018: 1.YOU Y H. Study on the influencing factors of balance ability in different population[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2018: 1. [6] 王红梅, 徐秀林. 人体动静态姿势平衡能力测试的理论与应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(43): 8095-8098. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKF201043042.htmWANG H M, XU X L. Theory and application of body balance function assessment[J]. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Res, 2010, 14(43): 8095-8098. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKF201043042.htm [7] 霍利斯·兰斯·利伯曼. 核心稳定性训练[M]. 杨溪, 译. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2015: 1.Hollis Lance Lieberman. Anatomy of core stability[M]. YANG X, translated. Beijing: ' Posts and Telecommunications Press, 2015: 1. [8] 韩春远, 王卫星, 成波锦, 等. 核心力量训练的基本问题: 核心区与核心稳定性[J]. 天津体育学院学报, 2012, 27(2): 117-120, 172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJTY201202008.htmHAN C Y, WANG W X, CHENG B J, et al. Basic issues of the core strength training: the core area and core stability[J]. J Tianjin Univ Sport, 2012, 27(2): 117-120, 172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJTY201202008.htm [9] EL-GOHARY T M, KHALED O A, IBRAHIM S R, et al. Effect of proprioception cross training on repositioning accuracy and balance among healthy individuals[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28: 3178-3182. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3178 [10] AMIRI B, SAHEBOZAMANI M, SEDIGHI B. The effects of 10-week core stability training on balance in women with multiple sclerosis according to expanded disability status scale: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2019, 55(2): 199-208. [11] 孙孟凡, 扈盛. 本体感觉神经促进技术联合核心稳定性训练对功能性踝关节不稳患者下肢功能康复的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2017, 39(11): 834-838. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSSA202009080.htmSUN M F, HU S. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combined with core stability training can help relieve functional ankle instability[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2017, 39(11): 834-838. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSSA202009080.htm [12] HA S Y, HAN J H, SUNG Y H. Effects of ankle strengthening exercise program on an unstable supporting surface on proprioception and balance in adults with functional ankle instability[J]. J Exerc Rehabil, 2018, 14(2): 301-305. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836082.041 [13] TRELEAVEN J, JULL G, LOWCHOY N. The relationship of cervical joint position error to balance and eye movement disturbances in persistent whiplash[J]. Man Ther, 2006, 11(2): 99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.04.003 [14] RASOOL J, GEORGE K. The impact of single-leg dynamic balance training on dynamic stability[J]. Phys Ther Sports, 2007, 8: 177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.06.001 [15] MALLIOU P, GIOFTSIDOU A, PAFIS G, et al. Proprioceptive training (balance exercises) reduces lower extremity injuries in young soccer players[J]. Back Musculo-skeletal Rehabil, 2004, 17: 101-104. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2004-173-403 [16] 王保臣. 功能性训练视角下提高游泳运动员身体平衡能力的实验研究. 天津: 天津体育学院, 2013.WANG B C. An experimental study on improving swimmer's balance ability from the perspective of functional training. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Sport, 2013. [17] IMBIRIBA L A, CORREIA M R A, FARIAS S G, et al. What we know so far about postural balance training: an exploratory scoping review of nomenclature and related issues[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2020, 24(3): 227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.02.008 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 597
- HTML全文浏览量: 280
- PDF下载量: 33
- 被引次数: 0