疫情防控常态化期间研究生社交焦虑及相关因素

邓旭阳; 刘晓刚; 张硕; 刘取芝; 王志琳; 王静; 向莉莉; 周萍

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.03.023

疫情防控常态化期间研究生社交焦虑及相关因素

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.03.023

1.
东南大学心理健康教育中心, 江苏南京 211189
2.
东南大学人文学院
3.
扬州大学心理健康教育中心
4.
河海大学心理健康教育与研究中心
5.
南京医科大学心理健康教育与研究中心
6.
苏州大学心理健康教育研究中心
7.
南京师范大学心理健康教育咨询中心

基金项目:

江苏省社会心理学学会新冠肺炎疫情专项课题 20SSXZC001

教育部高校思想政治工作队伍培养研修中心(郑州大学)2020年度思想政治工作队伍专项课题 ZZUKFYB202019

详细信息

作者简介:
邓旭阳(1966-), 男, 江苏省人, 博士, 副教授, 主要从事大学生心理健康教育工作

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G647.9 B844.2 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 1000
- HTML全文浏览量: 298
- PDF下载量: 83
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-15
- 修回日期: 2021-12-03
- 网络出版日期: 2022-03-29
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-25

Social anxiety and associated factors among graduate students under the normalization of epidemic prevention and control

1.
Mental Health Education Center of Southeast University, Nanjing(211189), China

摘要

摘要: 目的了解研究生群体在新冠肺炎疫情防控常态化期间社交焦虑状况及其相关影响因素, 为研究生群体健康促进提供参考借鉴。方法采用方便抽样方法对江苏省5所高校研究生进行在线问卷调查, 采用一般自我效能感量表(GSES)、疏离感量表(GAS)、社交焦虑量表(IAS)以及自编基本信息与居家生活状况调查表进行评估调查。结果疫情防控常态化期间, 研究生自我效能感、疏离感、社交焦虑得分分别为(2.58±0.50)(30.68±6.22)(47.55±8.77)分, 社交焦虑问题阳性症状检出率为43.96%;二元Logistic回归分析显示, 对手机等电子设备的依赖加重(OR=1.86, 95%CI=1.32~2.61)及较高的疏离感(中水平: OR=2.06, 95%CI=1.45~2.92;高水平: OR=5.19, 95%CI=1.00~27.00)均与社交焦虑呈正相关; 与好友交流增多(OR=0.65, 95%CI=0.47~0.90)、较高的自我效能感(中水平: OR=0.37, 95%CI=0.21~0.66;高水平: OR=0.15, 95%CI=0.08~0.30)均与社交焦虑呈负相关。结论疫情防控常态化期间研究生社交焦虑问题仍较为严重。获得朋辈支持、缓解个体疏离、提升自我效能感与减少对电子设备的依赖有助于改善特殊时期研究生社交焦虑问题。
- 冠状病毒属 /
- 焦虑 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To understand social anxiety and relevant factors among graduate students under the normalization stage of COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control. Methods Using convenience sampling method, an online questionnaire survey on graduate students from 5 universities in Jiangsu Province was conducted. Measurements used in the survey includes General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), General Alienation Scale (GAS), Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS) and self-made survey for basic information and household living conditions. Results The overall score of graduate students' self-efficacy was (2.58±0.50). Average score was (30.68±6.22) for alienation, and (47.55±8.77) for interaction anxiety, with detection rate of social anxiety being 43.96%. Increased dependence on smartphones and electronic devices (OR=1.86, 95%CI=1.32-2.61) and high alienation score (medium level: OR=2.06, 95%CI=1.45-2.92; high level: OR=5.19, 95%CI=1.00-27.00) were positively correlated with social anxiety. Increased communication with friends (OR=0.65, 95%CI=0.47-0.90 and high self-efficacy (medium level: OR=0.37, 95%CI=0.21-0.66; high level: OR=0.15, 95%CI=0.08-0.30) were negatively correlated with social anxiety. Conclusion At the normalization stage of COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control, social anxiety of graduate students is one of the mental health issues which need further attention. Participation in peer support helps prevent social anxiety through developing self-efficacy, alleviating individual alienation, and reducing dependence on electronic devices among graduate students.
- Coronavirus /
- Anxiety /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同年级研究生各量表评估得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of scale evaluation results among graduate ents of different grades(x±s)

组别	人数	自我效能感	疏离感	社交焦虑
研一	324	2.59±0.49	30.68±5.62	48.06±8.65
研二	207	2.59±0.52	31.27±6.32	48.27±8.32
研三	127	2.55±0.51	30.39±6.91	46.46±9.70
博士生	79	2.55±0.50	29.59±7.05	45.32±8.51
合计	737	2.58±0.50	30.68±6.22	47.55±8.77
F值		0.41	1.50	3.23^*
注： *P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 研究生社交焦虑相关因素单因素分析

Table 2. Univariate comparison of social anxiety related factors among graduate students

因素	选项	人数	社交焦虑阳性	χ²值
性别	女	470	236(50.2)	20.58^**
	男	267	88(33.0)
年级	研一	324	145(44.8)	9.35^*
	研二	207	104(50.2)
	研三	127	50(39.4)
	博士生	79	25(31.6)
与父母交流谈心增多	是	504	199(39.5)	12.98^**
	否	233	125(53.6
与好友交流减少	是	338	178(52.7)	19.19^**
	否	399	146(36.6)
对手机等电子依赖加重	是	473	232(49.0)	13.87^**
	否	264	92(34.8)
自我效能感水平	高	168	35(20.8)	68.51^**
	中	490	230(46.9)
	低	79	59(74.7)
疏离感水平	高	13	11(84.6)	54.40^**
	中	437	233(53.3)
	低	287	80(27.9)
注： P < 0.05，*P < 0.01；()内数字为阳性率/%；自我效能感与疏离感高、中、低水平分别以高于或低于其量表得分均值1个标准差为界划定。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 研究生社交焦虑症状相关因素二元Logistic回归分析(n=737)

Table 3. Binary Logistic regression analysis of factors related to depression and social anxiety symptoms in graduate students(n=737)

自变量	选项	偏回归系数	标准误	OR值(OR值95%CI)	P值
性别	女	0.56	0.18	1.75(1.24~2.47)	< 0.01
年级	研一	0.45	0.29	1.56(0.88~2.77)	0.13
	研二	0.73	0.31	2.08(1.14~3.79)	0.02
	研三	0.15	0.33	1.16(0.60~2.22)	0.66
与好友交流	增多	-0.43	0.17	0.65(0.47~0.90)	0.01
对手机等电子设备依赖	加重	0.62	0.17	1.86(1.32~2.61)	< 0.01
自我效能感	中水平	-1.00	0.29	0.37(0.21~0.66)	< 0.01
	高水平	-1.89	0.35	0.15(0.08~0.30)	< 0.01
疏离感	中水平	0.72	0.18	2.06(1.45~2.92)	< 0.01
	高水平	1.65	0.84	5.19(1.00~27.00)	0.05
注：自变量分别以男、博士生、与好友交流减少、对手机等电子设备依赖减轻、低水平自我效能感和低水平疏离感为参照组。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

[1]	边慧冕, 潘婷, 赵孟. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情早期大学生情绪分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(5): 668-670. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.05.009 BIAN H M, PAN T, ZHAO M. Analysis of emotions among college students in the early stage of COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(5): 668-670. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.05.009
[2]	西南大学新学工创新中心课题组, 孙楚航. 新冠肺炎疫情对青年大学生影响研究: 基于全国45所高校19850名大学生的实证调查[J]. 中国青年研究, 2020(4): 12, 43-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGQL202004006.htm Research Group of New Academic Woeker Innovation Center of Southwest University, SUN C H. The impact of COVID-19 on young college students: an empirical survey of 19850 college students from 45 universities in China[J]. Chin Youth Stud, 2020(4): 12, 43-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGQL202004006.htm
[3]	马少勇, 陈燕, 王方方, 等. 新冠肺炎流行期间医学生焦虑情绪及其影响因素[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(9): 1351-1355. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.09.018 MA S Y, CHEN Y, WANG F F, et al. Anxiety and associated factors among medical college students during COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(9): 1351-1355. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.09.018
[4]	郭晓薇. 大学生社交焦虑成因的研究[J]. 心理学探新, 2000, 20(1): 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT200001011.htm GUO X W. Study on cause of anxiety[J]. Explorat Psychol, 2000, 20(1): 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT200001011.htm
[5]	吴晓薇, 黄玲, 何晓琴, 等. 大学生社交焦虑与攻击、抑郁: 情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(5): 804-807. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201505010.htm WU X W, HUANG L, HE X Q, et al. Social anxiety, aggression and depression: the mediating of regulatory emotional self-efficacy[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2015, 23(5): 804-807. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201505010.htm
[6]	杨鹏飞, 宋玉红, 连帅磊, 等. 假想观众对青少年疏离感的影响: 社交焦虑的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(1): 74-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201801017.htm YANG P F, SONG Y H, LIAN S L, et al. The effect of imaginary audience on adolescent alienation: the mediating role of social anxiety[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2018, 26(1): 74-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201801017.htm
[7]	付梅, 葛明贵, 桑青松. 大学生一般自我效能感与社交焦虑[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2005, 19(7): 45-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS200507018.htm FU M, GE M G, SANG Q S. Self-efficacy and social anxiety in college students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2005, 19(7): 45-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS200507018.htm
[8]	董霞, 曾艳. 本科生社交焦虑与社会支持的关系研究[J]. 高教论坛, 2020(11): 54-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJY202011015.htm DONG X, ZENG Y. The Relationship between social anxiety and social support among undergraduates[J]. For Higher Educ, 2020(11): 54-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJY202011015.htm
[9]	王才康, 胡中锋, 刘勇. 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 应用心理学, 2001(1): 37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007 WANG C K, HU Z F, LIU Y. A study on the reliability and validity of General Self-efficacy Scale[J]. Chin J Appl Psychol, 2001(1): 37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007
[10]	陈维, 赵守盈, 罗杰, 等. 一般疏离感量表测试大学生样本的效度和信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(10): 780-784. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.10.013 CHEN W, ZHAO S Y, LUO J, et al. The General Alienation Scale was used to test the validity and reliability of college students[J]. Chin J Ment Health, 2015, 29(10): 780-784. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.10.013
[11]	彭纯子, 龚耀先, 朱熊兆. 交往焦虑量表的信效度及其在中国大学生中的适用性[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2004, 18(1): 39-41. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2004.01.014 PENG C Z, GONG Y X, ZHU X Z. Social Anxiety Scale and its application in Chinese college students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2004, 18(1): 39-41. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2004.01.014
[12]	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 205-206. WANG X D, WANG X L, MA H. Handbook of mental health rating scale(revised edition)[M]. Beijing: Chinese Journal of Mental Health, 1999: 205-206.
[13]	张玲玲. 社会支持和一般自我效能感对大学生应对方式的影响[J]. 江苏预防医学, 2020, 31(5): 497-499. ZHANG L L. The influence of social support and general self-efficacy on coping style of college students[J]. Jiangsu Prev Med, 2020, 31(5): 497-499.
[14]	陈文材, 陈思婧, 梅淑芳, 等. 新冠肺炎恢复期湖北省不同城市居民疏离感的比较研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2020, 34(Z): 18. CHEN W C, CHEN S J, MEI S F, et al. A comparative study on the sense of alienation among different urban residents in Hubei Province during the recovery period of COVID-19[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2020, 34(Z): 18.
[15]	张倩, 李晶华, 马天娇, 等. 长春市某高校大学生社交焦虑现状及影响因素[J]. 医学与社会, 2020, 33(3): 112-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH202003028.htm ZHANG Q, LI J H, MA T J, et al. Social anxiety among college students in changchun and its influencing factors[J]. Med Soc, 2020, 33(3): 112-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH202003028.htm
[16]	马俊军, 安连超. 反刍思维对大学生社交焦虑的影响: 孤独感的中介作用[J]. 心理学探新, 2019, 39(3): 277-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT201903014.htm MA J J, AN L C. The effect of rumination on social anxiety in college students: the mediating role of loneliness[J]. Psychol Explorat, 2019, 39(3): 277-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT201903014.htm
[17]	奥登, 王振杰, 唐婧. 新冠疫情下北京市大学生的心理状况调查及人口学因素分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2020, 26(5): 21, 122-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCRK202005010.htm AO D, WANG Z J, TANG J. Psychological status and demographic factors of college students in Beijing under COVID-19[J]. Popul Dev, 2020, 26(5): 21, 122-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCRK202005010.htm
[18]	张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. 自尊与社交焦虑的关系: 基于中国学生群体的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 1005-1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201906005.htm ZHANG Y L, LI S, YU G L. The relationship between self-esteem and social anxiety: a meta-analysis of Chinese students[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2019, 27(6): 1005-1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201906005.htm
[19]	万鹏宇, 林忠永, 冯志远, 等. 情感平衡对初中留守儿童问题行为的影响: 心理韧性的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2017(12): 68-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2017.12.010 WAN P Y, LIN Z Y, FENG Z Y, et al. The relationship between emotional balance and problem behavior among left-behind children in junior middle school: the mediating role of resilience and the moderating role of gender[J]. Chin J Spec Educ, 2017(12): 68-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2017.12.010
[20]	程刚, 肖友琴. 社交焦虑障碍的性别差异及其生物学解释. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2015, 23(2): 307-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201502041.htm CHENG G, XIAO Y Q. Gender differences in social anxiety disorder and its biological interpretation. Chin J Health Psychol, 2015, 23(2): 307-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201502041.htm
[21]	INDIAN M, GRIEVE R. When facebook is easier than face-to-face: social support derived from facebook in socially anxious individuals. Pers Indiv Diff, 2014, 59(3): 102-106.
[22]	姜永志, 白晓丽. 大学生手机互联网依赖对疏离感的影响: 社会支持系统的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 540-549. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201405012.htm JIANG Y Z, BAI X L. The effect of mobile phone Internet dependence on alienation among college students: the role of social support system. Psychol Dev Educ, 2014, 30(5): 540-549. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201405012.htm
[23]	朱越, 沈伊默, 周霞, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下负性情绪影响心理健康的条件过程模型: 人际疏离感的调节作用. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNND202005001.htm ZHU Y, SHEN Y M, ZHOU X, et al. A conditional process model of negative emotions influencing mental health in COVID-19: the moderating role of interpersonal alienation. J Southwest Univ(Nat Sci Edit), 2020, 42(5): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNND202005001.htm
[24]	杨娟. 研究生心理健康危机预防体系初探. 江苏教育, 2019(88): 54-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JAOI201988025.htm YANG J. A preliminary study on crisis prevention system of graduate students' mental health. Jiangsu Educ, 2019(88): 54-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JAOI201988025.htm
[25]	聂衍刚, 曾敏霞, 张萍萍, 等. 青少年人际压力、人际自我效能感与社交适应行为的关系. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 346-351. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2013.03.010 NIE Y G, ZENG M X, ZHANG P P, et al. The relationship between interpersonal stress, interpersonal self-efficacy and social adaptive behavior among adolescents. Stud Psychol Behav, 2013, 11(3): 346-351. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2013.03.010