累积生态风险对大学生健康生活方式的影响

靳明; 王静

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.03.008

累积生态风险对大学生健康生活方式的影响

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.03.008

靳明¹,
王静²

1.
石家庄学院体育学院，河北 050035
2.
石家庄学院安全工作处，河北 050035

基金项目:

教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目 20YJA890010

详细信息

作者简介:
靳明(1971-)，男，河北邯郸人，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为运动心理学、体育教育训练学

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G647.9 R179
计量
- 文章访问数: 603
- HTML全文浏览量: 305
- PDF下载量: 60
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-12
- 修回日期: 2022-01-06
- 网络出版日期: 2022-03-29
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-25

Effects of cumulative ecological risk on healthy lifestyle among college students

JIN Ming¹,
WANG Jing²

1.
Department of Physical Education, Shijiazhuang University College, Shijiazhuang (050035), China

摘要

摘要: 目的考察累积生态风险对当前和0.5年后健康生活方式的影响效应和作用模式，为促进大学生健康生活方式提供数据支持。方法采用随机整群抽样法，从河北省3所大学大一、大二年级中随机抽取1 156名大学生作为被试，采用大学生健康生活方式量表、累积生态风险量表分别于2020年11月与2021年5月进行调查，采用SPSS 24.0统计软件进行分层回归分析。结果累积生态风险对大学生健康生活方式不仅具有横向负向预测效应(β=-0.29，P＜0.01)，而且具有纵向负向预测效应(β=-0.11，P＜0.01)。累积生态风险对大学生健康生活方式的横向预测呈现正加速模式，某一临界点(4个风险数目)之后，健康生活方式水平开始大幅下降；纵向预测呈现线性模式。性别在累积生态风险指数与0.5年后第二次测量健康生活方式之间的线性关系中调节效应无统计学意义(β=-0.02，P>0.05)，在累积生态风险与第一次测量当前健康生活方式之间的非线性关系中调节效应有统计学意义(β=0.12，P＜0.01)。结论累积生态风险对大学生健康生活方式具有横向和纵向的负向预测效应，其中横向的负向预测效应更高；横向预测的作用模式为正加速模式，纵向预测为线性模式；性别在累积生态风险与健康生活方式之间的横向关系中具有调节效应。
- 社会环境 /
- 生活方式 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects and patterns of cumulative ecological risk on currrent and 6-month follow-up healthy lifestyle among college students. Methods A total of 1 156 freshmen and sophomores students randomly selected from 3 universities in Hebei Province were administered with College Students Health Lifestyle Scale and the Cumulative Ecological Risk Scale in November 2020 and May 2021 respectively. SPSS 24.0 statistical software was used for hierarchical regression analysis. Results Cumulative ecological risk was both negatively associated with current healthy lifestyle (β=-0.29, P < 0.01), and healthy lifestyle 6-month after (β=-0.11, P < 0.01). The effects of cumulative ecological risks on current healthy lifestyle showed non-linear pattern, with healthy lifestyle rapidly decline after accumulated more than 4 factors. The effects of umulative ecological risks on 6-month follow-up healthy lifestyle showed a linear pattern. No moderating effect of gender was observed in the linear relationship between the cumulative ecological risk and 6-month follow-up healthy lifestyle(β=-0.02, P>0.05), however, significant moderating effects of gender was found in the nonlinear relationship between cumulative ecological risk and current healthy lifestyle(β=0.12, P < 0.01). Conclusion Cumulative ecological risk is negatively associated with healthy lifestyle of college students cross-sectionally and longitudinally, in a non-linear and linear association pattern, respectively. Gender plays a moderating effect on the cross-sectional asscociation between cumulative ecological risk and healthy lifestyle.
- Social environment /
- Life style /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 累积生态风险对大学生健康生活方式预测的作用模式

Table 1. Effects of cumulative ecological risk on healthy lifestyle prediction of college students at present and six months later

自变量	T1健康生活方式(n=1 224)				T2健康生活方式(n=1 192)
自变量	β值	t值	标准误	R²值	β值	t值	标准误	R²值
第一层				0.07				0.04
性别	0.07^**	2.82	0.05		0.03	0.61	0.02
城乡×生源	-0.19^**	-7.17	0.06		-0.08^**	-3.09	0.07
年龄	0.04	0.64	0.03		0.02	0.39	0.02
第二层				0.10				0.06
T1累积生态风险一次项	-0.16^**	-6.01	0.03		-0.11^**	-3.61	0.03
第三层				0.11				0.06
T2累积生态风险二次项	-0.22^**	-11.61	0.02		0.03	0.56	0.04
注：第一层对应的系数是在只包括该层变量的情况下计算得出，第二层的系数是在控制第一层变量的情况下计算得出，第三层的系数是在控制第一层和第二层变量的情况下计算得出；**P＜0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 等. 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力: 子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 482-495. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201405005.htm BAO Z Z, LI D P, ZHANG W, et al. Cumulative ecological risk and adolescents' academic and social competence: the compensatory and moderating effects of sense of responsibility to parents[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2014, 30(5) : 482-495. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201405005.htm
[2]	科洛斯尼齐娜, 西季科夫. 影响健康生活方式的宏观因素[J]. 社会科学战线, 2014(7): 236-245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZX201407037.htm KOLOSNIZINA M R, SIDIKOV M T. Macro factors affecting healthy lifestyle[J]. Soc Sci Front, 2014(7): 236-245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZX201407037.htm
[3]	EVANS G W. Cumulative risk and child development[J]. Psychol Bull, 2013, 139(6): 1342-1396. doi: 10.1037/a0031808
[4]	APPLEYARD K. When more is not better: the role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes[J]. J Child Psychol Psyc, 2005, 46(3): 235-245. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00351.x
[5]	FARRELL A D, DANISH S J, HOWARD C W, et al. Risk factors for drug use in urban adolescents: identification and cross-validation[J]. Am J Commun Psychol, 1992, 20(3): 263-285. doi: 10.1007/BF00937910
[6]	MRUG S, LOOSIER P S, WINDLE M. Violence exposure across multiple contexts: individual and joint effects on adjustment[J]. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 2008, 78(1): 70-84. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.78.1.70
[7]	王冬. 大学生健康生活方式评价量表研制及初步应用研究[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2009. WANG D. Development and preliminary application of Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaire(HLQ) for College Students[D]. Guangzhou: Southern Medical University, 2009.
[8]	李董平, 周月月, 赵力燕, 等. 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾: 心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1519-1537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201612003.htm LI D P, ZHOU Y Y, ZHAO L Y, et al. Cumulative ecological risk and adolescent Internet addiction: the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction and positive outcome expectancy[J]. Acta Psychol Sinica, 2016, 13 (12): 1519-1537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201612003.htm
[9]	陈艳鹤. 中学生亲子关系量表的初步编制与应用[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2012. CHEN Y H. Preliminary development and application of the Middle-school Student's Parent-child Relationship Scale[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2012.
[10]	姜乾金. 领悟社会支持量表[J]. 中华行为医学科学, 2001, 10(10): 41-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201813017.htm JIANG Q J. Understanding Social Support Scale[J]. Chin J Behav Med, 2001, 10 (10): 41-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201813017.htm
[11]	吴超. 中学生人际关系与主观幸福感的相关性研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2008. WU C. Relation between interpersonal relationship and subjective well-being of middle school students[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2008.
[12]	王帅青. 初中生人际关系与自尊、人格的关系研究[D]. 新乡: 河南师范大学, 2017. WANG S Q. Research of the relations between junior middle school students' interpersonal relationship and their self-esteem, personality[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Normal University, 2017.
[13]	李蓉. 学校联结、积极情绪、亲子沟通与中学生学业成绩的关系: 留守与非留守的比较[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2019. LI R. The relationship between school connection, positive emotion, parent-child communication and academic achievement of middle school students: a comparison between left-behind and non-left-behind[D]. Changsha: Hunan Normal University, 2019.
[14]	宁祥娟. 不良同伴交往与中职生问题行为的关系: 父母教养方式的调节作用[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2016. NING X J. Relationship between peer association and problem behavior of secondary vocational students: the moderating role of parenting style[D]. Jinan: Shandong Normal University, 2016.
[15]	WADE M, MOORE C, ASTINGTON J W. Cumulative contextual risk, maternal responsivity, and social cognition at 18 months[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2015, 27(1): 189-203. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000674
[16]	COHEN J, COHEN P, WEST S G, et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences[M]. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
[17]	廖丽萍, 张呈磊. "重男轻女"会损害女孩的健康状况吗?[J]. 经济评论, 2020(2): 139-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJPL202002009.htm LIAO L P, ZHANG C L. Does the son preference harm girls health?[J]. Econom Rev, 2020 (2): 139-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJPL202002009.htm