Analysis of health monitoring results in the teaching environment of primary and secondary schools in Sichuan Province from 2017 to 2021
-
摘要:
目的 分析四川省2017—2021年中小学教学环境卫生现状,为制定教学环境卫生干预措施提供依据。 方法 2017—2021年按照统一调查表对四川省7 510所中小学校监督抽检,采用描述性统计分析方法对监测结果进行分析。 结果 2017—2021年中小学校教学环境卫生总体合格率仅为51.70%(3 883所),2017年抽检2 282家,1 414家合格,合格率最高(61.96%); 2019年抽检1 768家,750家合格,合格率最低(42.42%)。不同检测项目在2017—2021年各年中的合格率及同一检测项目在2017—2021年不同年份合格率差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。乡村地区5年共抽检2 095家,1 177家合格,合格率最高(56.18%); 城区5年共抽检2 124家,1 040家合格,合格率最低(48.96%)。小学学段5年共抽检4 867家,2 626家合格,合格率最高(53.93%)。不同地区在课桌椅配备、教室采光、黑板照度、教室人均面积、学生宿舍人均面积方面合格率差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为9.87,17.51,37.69,75.43,11.22,P值均<0.05),不同学段在教室采光、教室人均面积、学生宿舍人均面积、教室和学生宿舍通风方面合格率差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为9.16,39.37,79.56,31.37,P值均<0.05)。 结论 四川省中小学校教学环境有待持续改善,教室采光、课桌椅配备合格率较低,应对薄弱环节加大投入。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the current situation of teaching environmental sanitation in primary and secondary schools in Sichuan Province from 2017 to 2021, and to provide basis for the development of teaching environmental sanitation intervention measures in Sichuan Province. Methods A total of 7 510 primary and secondary schools were supervised and sampled from 2017 to 2021 according to the unified questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analysis method was used to analyze the monitoring results. Results The overall pass rate from 2017 to 2021 is only 51.70% (3 883), a total of 2 282 were sampled in 2017 and 1 414 were qualified, with the pass rate was the highest (61.96%), a total of 1 768 were sampled in 2019 and 750 were qualified, with the lowest pass rate (42.42%). The pass rate of different testing items in each year from 2017 to 2021 and the pass rate of the same test item in different years from 2017 to 2021 were statistically significant (P < 0.05). A total of 2 095 samples were inspected in rural areas in five years, and 1 177 were qualified, with the highest pass rate (56.18%). In urban areas, a total of 2 124 samples were inspected in five years, and 1 040 were qualified, with the lowest pass rate (48.96%). In the five-year period of primary school, a total of 4 867 schools were sampled, and 2 626 were qualified, with the highest pass rate (53.93%). There were statistically significant differences in the qualification rate of desks and chairs, classroom lighting, blackboard illumination, per capita area of classrooms, and per capita area of student dormitories in different regions (χ2=9.87, 17.51, 37.69, 75.43, 11.22, P < 0.05), and there were statistically significant differences in the pass rates of classroom lighting, per capita area of classrooms, per capita area of student dormitories, and ventilation of classrooms and student dormitories between different school sections (χ2=9.16, 39.37, 79.56, 31.37, P < 0.05). Conclusion The teaching environment of primary and secondary schools in Sichuan Province needs to be improved continuously, the qualified rate of classroom lighting and desks and chairs is low, and the investment in weak links should be increased. 1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。 -
表 1 2017—2021年各教学环境卫生检测项目合格率比较
Table 1. Comparison of qualification rates of different teaching environmental sanitation testing items from 2017 to 2021
年份 学校数 课桌椅配备 教室采光 黑板照度 教室人均面积 学生宿舍人均面积 教室和学生宿舍通风 χ2值 P值 2017 2 282 1 598(70.73) 1 876(82.81) 1 539(67.44) 1 362(59.68) 2 215(97.06) 2 148(94.13) 1 551.96 < 0.01 2018 1 714 1 117(65.17) 1 298(75.73) 1 171(68.32) 1 225(71.47) 1 489(86.87) 1 608(93.82) 605.57 < 0.01 2019 1 768 1 088(61.54) 1 151(65.10) 1 068(60.41) 1 123(63.52) 1 746(98.76) 1 738(98.30) 1 614.74 < 0.01 2020 1 696 1 047(61.73) 1 272(75.00) 1 006(59.32) 1 090(64.27) 1 671(98.53) 1 671(98.53) 1 530.30 < 0.01 2021 50 44(88.00) 37(74.00) 43(86.00) 45(90.00) 33(60.00) 40(80.00) 13.77 0.02 χ2值 54.28 156.22 62.13 74.47 466.16 126.14 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 注: ()内数字为合格率/%。 表 2 不同地区不同学段学校教学环境卫生指标合格率比较
Table 2. Comparison of qualified rates of teaching environmental health indicators of schools in different sections and different regions
地区与学段 学校数 统计值 课桌椅配备 教室采光 黑板照度 教室人均面积 学生宿舍人均面积 教室和学生宿舍通风 地区 城区 2 124 1 326(62.43) 1 525(71.80) 1 255(59.09) 1 266(59.60) 2 043(96.19) 2 036(95.86) 镇区 3 291 2 175(66.09) 2 527(76.96) 2 153(65.42) 2 073(62.99) 3 105(94.35) 3 170(96.32) 乡村 2 095 1 393(66.49) 1 582(75.51) 1 419(67.73) 1 506(71.89) 2 006(95.75) 1 999(95.42) χ2值 9.87 17.51 37.69 75.43 11.22 2.75 P值 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.25 学段 小学 4 867 3 208(65.91) 3 680(75.61) 3 171(65.15) 3 264(67.06) 4 714(96.86) 4 706(96.69) 初中 2 026 1 299(64.12) 1 522(75.12) 1 280(63.18) 1 215(59.97) 1 876(92.60) 1 930(95.26) 高中 617 387(62.72) 432(70.02) 376(60.94) 366(59.32) 564(91.41) 569(92.22) χ2值 3.80 9.16 5.68 39.37 79.56 31.37 P值 0.15 0.01 0.06 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 注: ()内数字为合格率/%。 -
[1] 庞达. 把全面增强青少年体质上升为国家战略[J]. 民主与科学, 2020(3): 21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0026.2020.03.011PANG D. Comprehensively enhance the physique of young people as a national strategy[J]. Democracy Sci, 2020(3): 21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0026.2020.03.011 [2] 张勇, 王丽. 对全国青少年学生1985—2000年体质状况的比较研究[J]. 中国体育科技, 2003(5): 25-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTY200305007.htmZHANG Y, WANG L. A comparative study on the physical fitness of young students in China from 1985 to 2000[J]. China Sports Sci Technol, 2003(5): 25-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTY200305007.htm [3] 卫生部. 学校卫生综合评价: GB/T 18205—2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012.Ministry of Health of the PRC. Comprehensive appraisement for health in schools: GB/T 18205-2012[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012. [4] 教育部, 卫生部, 财政部. 国家学校体育卫生条件试行基本标准[EB/OL]. (2008-06-09)[2021-07-28]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A17/moe_938/s3273/200806/t20080612_88635.html.Ministry of Education of the PRC, Ministry of Health of the PRC, Ministry of Finance of the PRC. National basic standards for school physical education and hygiene conditions[EB/OL]. (2008-06-09)[2021-07-28]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A17/moe_938/s3273/200806/t20080612_88635.html. [5] 住房和城乡建设部. 中小学校设计规范: GB 50099—2011[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the PRC. Code for design of school: GB 50099-2011[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012. [6] 卫生部. 中小学校教室采光和照明卫生标准: GB 7793—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.Ministry of Health of the PRC. Hygienic standard for day lighting and Artificial lighting for middle and elementary school: GB 7793-2010[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2011. [7] 卫生部. 学生宿舍卫生要求及管理规范: GB 31177—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.Ministry of Health of the PRC. Sanitary and administrative standards for school dormitory: GB 31177-2014[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2014. [8] 国家统计局统计上划分城乡工作管理办法[J]. 城市规划通讯, 2006(11): 12.Administrative measures for the statistical division of urban and rural work by the National Bureau of Statistics[J]. J Urban Plann Commun, 2006(11): 12. [9] 吴瑶, 李曼, 黄哲, 等. 中国2018年中小学校教学环境卫生现状[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(5): 745-748. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.05.027WU Y, LI M, HUANG Z, et al. Current situation of teaching environmental sanitation in primary and secondary schools in China in 2018[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(5): 745-748. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.05.027 [10] 金星, 葛振兴, 范忠飞, 等. 上海市中小学校教学环境卫生现况调查[J]. 中国卫生监督杂志, 2014, 21(4): 349-351. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6131.2014.04.012JIN X, GE Z X, FAN Z F, et al. Survey on the current situation of teaching environmental hygiene in primary and secondary schools in Shanghai[J]. Chin J Health Inspect, 2014, 21(4): 349-351. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6131.2014.04.012 [11] 钟博文, 卢超淼, 王秀芹, 等. 厦门市海沧区学校教学环境监测结果分析[J]. 职业与健康, 2016, 32(12): 1693-1695. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYJK201612036.htmZHONG B W, LU C M, WANG X Q, et al. Analysis on the monitoring results of school teaching environment in Haicang District of Xiamen City[J]. Occup Health, 2016, 32(12): 1693-1695. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYJK201612036.htm [12] 马岚, 任宏伟. 2014年洛阳市中小学校教学环境卫生状况调查分析[J]. 河南预防医学杂志, 2016, 27(8): 567-569. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYF201608004.htmMA L, REN H W. Investigation and analysis of teaching environmental sanitation in primary and secondary schools in Luoyang in 2014[J]. Henan J Prev Med, 2016, 27(8): 567-569. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYF201608004.htm [13] 四川省人民政府办公厅. 关于全面加强乡村小规模学校和乡镇寄宿制学校建设的通知[J]. 四川省人民政府公报, 2018(21): 26-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXRZ201922004.htmGeneral Office of the Sichuan Provincial People's Government. Notice of the comprehensively strengthening the construction of rural small-scale schools and township boarding schools[J]. Bull Sichuan Provincial People's Government, 2018(21): 26-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXRZ201922004.htm [14] 韦秀清, 陈希龙, 邹竹芳. 江西省武宁县中小学生近视现状调查及其影响因素分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(11): 1806-1809. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2021.11.009WEI X Q, CHEN X L, ZOU Z F. Investigation on myopia of primary and middle school students in Wuning County, Jiangxi Province and analysis of its influencing factors[J]. Shanxi Med J, 2021, 50(11): 1806-1809. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2021.11.009 [15] 陈荣凯, 江海棠, 毕嘉琦, 等. 2011—2014年深圳市宝安区中小学校教室采光照明与学生视力不良的关系[J]. 预防医学论坛, 2016, 22(2): 131-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXWX201602018.htmCHEN R K, JIANG H T, BI J Q, et al. The relationship between lighting and poor eyesight in classrooms of primary and secondary schools in Baoan District of Shenzhen City from 2011 to 2014[J]. Forum Prev Med, 2016, 22(2): 131-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXWX201602018.htm [16] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会办公厅, 教育部办公厅, 国家体育总局办公厅. 关于加强儿童青少年近视防控工作的指导意见[J]. 中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2016(12): 21-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJKJ201623021.htmGeneral Office of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the PRC, General Office of Ministry of Education of the PRC, General Office of General Administ ration of Sports of China. Guiding opinions of strengthening the prevention and control of myopia in children and adolescents[J]. Bull Ministry Educ PRC, 2016(12): 21-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJKJ201623021.htm [17] 刘睿聪, 曾婕, 程炼, 等. 四川省2013—2014年中小学校教学环境卫生状况[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2016, 37(2): 256-258. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.02.029LIU R C, ZENG J, CHENG L, et al. The health status of teaching environment in primary and secondary schools in Sichuan Province from 2013 to 2014[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2016, 37(2): 256-258. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.02.029 [18] 丁以标, 张怡俊, 佘茜, 等. 上海市高桥社区学校环境卫生调查与分析[J]. 上海医药, 2018, 39(6): 54-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYIY201806019.htmDING Y B, ZHANG Y J, SHE Q, et al. Investigation and analysis of environmental hygiene of gaoqiao community school in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Med Pharmac J, 2018, 39(6): 54-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYIY201806019.htm [19] 仇雨干, 高湘陵, 周群霞, 等. 江苏省2011年中小学校教学环境卫生监测结果分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2013, 34(6): 757-758. http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201306047QIU Y G, GAO X L, ZHOU Q X, et al. Analysis of monitoring results of teaching environmental hygiene in primary and middle schools in Jiangsu Province in 2011[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2013, 34(6): 757-758. http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201306047 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 701
- HTML全文浏览量: 350
- PDF下载量: 83
- 被引次数: 0