寄宿制学校初中生亲子关系与叛逆心理的关联

蔡玉玉; 周正升; 张梦研; 张舒涵; 苏普玉; 邵珊珊

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.016

寄宿制学校初中生亲子关系与叛逆心理的关联

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.016

蔡玉玉¹,
周正升¹,
张梦研¹,
张舒涵¹,
苏普玉^{1, 2},
邵珊珊^{1, 2, ,}

1.
安徽医科大学公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系, 合肥 230032
2.
安徽医科大学出生人口健康教育部重点实验室/人口健康与优生安徽省重点实验室

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 81803248

国家自然科学基金项目 82173539

详细信息

作者简介:
蔡玉玉(1998-), 女, 安徽淮北人, 在读本科

通讯作者:
邵珊珊, E-mail: shaoshsh@126.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: B844.2 G78 G478
计量
- 文章访问数: 665
- HTML全文浏览量: 381
- PDF下载量: 43
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-19
- 修回日期: 2021-11-29
- 网络出版日期: 2022-02-24
- 刊出日期: 2022-02-25

Association between parent-child relationship and rebelliousness in boarding school students

1.
Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei (230032), China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨亲子关系与寄宿制学校初中生叛逆心理的关联性, 为预防青少年叛逆心理的发生提供科学依据。方法于2020年1月, 采用整群抽样方法对安徽省合肥市庐江县某寄宿制中学1 790名初中生进行亲子分离、家庭亲密度、叛逆心理情况调查, 采用χ²检验、二元Logistic回归法分析亲子关系对学生叛逆心理的影响。结果初中生叛逆心理检出率为21.45%(384/1 790)。高年级(初二、初三)、主观家庭社会经济地位高和1个月内不与父母联系的初中生更容易存在叛逆心理(OR值分别为1.83, 1.89, 1.80, 1.77, P值均 < 0.05);父母温暖抚育度高和亲子亲密度高的初中生更不容易存在叛逆心理(OR值分别为0.52, 0.71, P值均 < 0.05);性别、既往寄宿时长、母亲文化程度、寄宿期间与父母见面频率、童年亲子分离经历对叛逆心理的影响均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论寄宿制学校初中生叛逆心理检出率高, 良好的亲子关系是叛逆心理的保护因素。父母应重视与寄宿子女间的联系, 加强沟通交流, 以预防初中生叛逆心理的发生。
- 亲子关系 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between parent-child relationship and rebelliousness of junior middle school students in boarding schools and to provide a scientific basis for preventing the occurrence of youth rebellion. Methods A cluster sampling method was used to investigate parent-child separation, family intimacy, and rebellion among 1 790 junior high school students in one boarding middle school in Lujiang County, Hefei City, Anhui Province in January 2020, and the influence of parent-child relationship on students' rebelliousness was analyzed by Chi-square test and binary Logistic regression. Results The detection rate of rebelliousness among participants was 21.45%(384/1 790). Junior middle school students who were in senior grade (second and third grades), reported higher household economic status and no communication with parents during the past month were more likely to have rebelliousness(OR=1.83, 1.89, 1.80, 1.77, P < 0.05); Junior middle school students with higher parental warmth and intimacy were less likely to have rebelliousness(OR=0.52, 0.71, P < 0.05); Gender, length of boarding, maternal education, frequency of meeting parents during boarding, and childhood experience of separation with parents showed no statistical significance on rebelliousness(P>0.05). Conclusion The detection rate of rebellious psychology among junior high school students in boarding schools is high, and good parent-child relationship is the protective factor of rebellious psychology. Parents should pay attention to contact with their boarding children and strengthen communication to reduce rebelliousness among them.
- Parent-child relations /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同人口学特征初中生叛逆心理检出率比较

Table 1. Comparison of demographic characteristics of rebellious psychology among junior middle school students

人口统计学指标	选项	人数	统计值	对限制性选择的情绪反应	对依从性的逆反反应	抵制来自别人的影响	对别人意见或建议的逆反反应	总叛逆
性别^*	男	1 298		217(16.72)	302(23.27)	271(20.88)	248(19.11)	259(19.95)
	女	491		103(20.98)	123(25.05)	99(20.16)	120(24.44)	124(25.25)
			χ²值	4.40	0.63	0.11	6.20	5.95
			P值	0.04	0.43	0.74	＜0.01	0.02
年级	初一	614		78(12.70)	82(13.36)	100(16.29)	100(16.29)	86(14.01)
	初二	574		117(20.38)	162(28.22)	141(24.56)	133(23.17)	144(25.09)
	初三	602		126(20.93)	181(30.07)	129(21.43)	136(22.59)	154(25.58)
			χ²值	17.43	56.25	12.72	10.76	30.79
			P值	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01	0.01	＜0.01
既往寄宿时长/学期^*	≤2	570		100(17.54)	126(22.11)	111(19.47)	117(20.53)	118(20.70)
	3~6	758		135(17.81)	178(23.48)	153(20.18)	139(18.34)	156(20.58)
	≥7	336		63(18.75)	95(28.27)	80(23.81)	86(25.60)	88(26.19)
			χ²值	0.22	4.60	2.63	7.51	4.87
			P值	0.90	0.10	0.27	0.02	0.09
父亲文化程度	高中及以下	1 658		299(18.03)	393(23.70)	337(20.33)	341(20.57)	356(21.47)
	大专及以上	132		22(16.67)	32(24.24)	33(25.00)	28(21.21)	28(21.21)
			χ²值	0.16	0.02	1.63	0.03	0.01
			P值	0.69	0.89	0.20	0.86	0.94
母亲文化程度	高中及以下	1 678		304(18.12)	402(23.96)	353(21.04)	348(20.74)	364(21.69)
	大专及以上	112		17(15.18)	23(20.54)	17(15.18)	21(18.75)	20(17.86)
			χ²值	0.62	0.68	2.20	0.25	0.92
			P值	0.43	0.41	0.14	0.61	0.34
主观家庭社会经济地位	低	238		52(21.85)	53(22.27)	50(21.01)	33(13.87)	54(22.69)
	中等	1 357		226(16.65)	316(23.29)	272(20.04)	294(21.67)	277(20.41)
	高	195		43(22.05)	56(28.72)	48(24.62)	42(21.54)	53(27.18)
			χ²值	6.23	3.11	2.19	7.64	4.88
			P值	0.04	0.21	0.33	0.02	0.09
注： *表示有数据缺失；()内数据为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 亲子关系与寄宿制学校初中生叛逆心理的单因素分析

Table 2. Univariate factor analysis of parent-child relationship and rebellious psychology of junior middleschool students in boarding school

组别	选项	人数	统计值	对限制性选择的情绪反应	对依从性的逆反反应	抵制来自别人的影响	对别人意见或建议的逆反反应	总叛逆
1个月内与父母电话微信联系情况	联系	1 707		302(17.69)	394(23.08)	334(19.57)	344(20.15)	356(20.86)
	不联系	83		19(22.89)	31(37.35)	36(43.37)	25(30.12)	28(33.73)
			χ²值	1.45	8.90	27.36	4.81	7.79
			P值	0.23	＜0.01	＜0.01	0.03	＜0.01
与父母见面频率	半年内至少见1次	1 370		229(16.72)	296(21.61)	261(19.05)	258(18.83)	265(19.34)
	半年以上见1次	420		92(21.90)	129(30.71)	109(25.95)	111(26.43)	119(28.33)
			χ²值	5.88	14.73	9.34	11.34	15.42
			P值	0.02	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01
6岁前与父母分离^*	与双亲分离	609		132(21.67)	169(27.75)	160(26.27)	131(21.51)	167(27.42)
	仅与母亲分离	73		8(10.96)	14(19.18)	17(23.29)	18(24.66)	14(19.18)
	仅与父亲分离	169		29(17.16)	36(21.30)	36(21.30)	32(18.93)	36(21.30)
	无父母分离	676		113(16.72)	144(21.30)	112(16.57)	136(20.12)	123(18.20)
			χ²值	8.46	9.02	18.20	1.39	16.32
			P值	0.04	0.03	＜0.01	0.71	＜0.01
6岁后与父母分离^*	与双亲分离	695		143(20.58)	202(29.06)	169(24.32)	149(21.44)	182(26.19)
	仅与母亲分离	93		16(17.20)	18(19.35)	25(26.88)	23(24.73)	22(23.66)
	仅与父亲分离	234		35(14.96)	45(19.23)	47(20.09)	35(14.96)	39(16.67)
	无父母分离	596		94(15.77)	115(19.30)	97(16.28)	119(19.97)	101(16.95)
			χ²值	6.65	21.10	14.73	5.87	19.97
			P值	0.08	＜0.01	＜0.01	0.12	＜0.01
父母温暖抚育度^*	低	971		200(20.60)	282(29.04)	258(26.57)	242(24.92)	263(27.09)
	高	800		118(14.75)	138(17.25)	108(13.50)	123(15.38)	117(14.63)
			χ²值	10.18	33.71	45.70	24.44	40.41
			P值	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01
亲子亲密度^*	低	947		202(21.33)	275(29.04)	256(27.03)	228(24.08)	251(26.50)
	高	834		118(14.15)	146(17.51)	111(13.31)	138(16.55)	129(15.47)
			χ²值	15.52	32.68	51.05	15.40	32.19
			P值	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01	＜0.01
注： *表示有数据缺失；()内数据为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 亲子关系与寄宿制学校初中生叛逆心理的多因素Logistic回归分析[OR值(OR值95%CI)，n=1 790]

Table 3. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of parent-child relationship and rebellious psychology of junior middle school students in boarding schools[OR(OR 95%CI), n=1 790]

自变量	选项	对限制性选择的情绪反应	对依从性的逆反反应	抵制来自别人的影响	对别人意见或建议的逆反反应	总叛逆
年级	初一	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	初二	1.72(1.18~2.51)^**	2.37(1.65~3.39)^**	1.54(1.09~2.17)^*	1.51(1.06~2.16)^*	1.83(1.28~2.61)^**
	初三	1.87(1.28~2.74)^**	2.70(1.88~3.89)^**	1.11(0.77~1.60)	1.53(1.06~2.19)^*	1.89(1.31~2.71)^**
既往寄宿时长/学期	≤2	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	3~6	0.91(0.66~1.26)	0.96(0.70~1.30)	1.01(0.73~1.39)	0.77(0.56~1.07)	0.96(0.70~1.31)
	≥7	0.88(0.58~1.32)	1.14(0.79~1.67)	1.16(0.78~1.72)	1.50(1.03~2.20)^*	1.26(0.86~1.85)
父亲文化程度	高中及以下	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	大专及以上	0.84(0.40~1.74)	1.10(0.57~2.13)	1.97(1.06~3.66)^*	1.09(0.56~2.12)	1.00(0.50~1.98)
主观家庭社会经济地位	低	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	中等	0.68(0.46~1.01)	1.23(0.82~1.84)	1.16(0.77~1.75)	2.27(1.40~3.68)^**	0.93(0.63~1.38)
	高	1.12(0.63~1.98)	1.96(1.11~3.47)^*	1.46(0.81~2.63)	2.64(1.38~5.05)^**	1.80(1.03~3.15)^*
1个月内与父母电话微信联系情况	联系	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	不联系	1.26(0.68~2.36)	2.16(1.23~3.80)^**	2.90(1.67~5.04)^**	1.70(0.95~3.06)	1.77(1.00~3.13)^*
与父母见面频率	半年内至少见1次	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	半年以上见1次	1.11(0.79~1.56)	1.39(1.01~1.90)^*	1.12(0.80~1.56)	1.54(1.11~2.14)^*	1.20(0.87~1.66)
父母温暖抚育度	低	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	高	0.85(0.62~1.17)	0.58(0.43~0.77)	0.54(0.40~0.74)^**	0.54(0.39~0.73)^**	0.52(0.38~0.71)^**
亲子亲密度	低	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	高	0.67(0.49~0.92)^*	0.71(0.53~0.95)^*	0.53(0.39~0.72)^**	0.69(0.51~0.94)^*	0.71(0.52~0.95)^*
注： P＜0.05，*P＜0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	迟钰雪, 刘怡君. 逆反心理的网络舆情传播机制研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2019, 34(5): 610-620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGC201905004.htm CHI Y X, LIU Y J. Study on the transmission mechanism of online public opinion of reverse psychology[J]. J Syst Eng, 2019, 34(5): 610-620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGC201905004.htm
[2]	韩梅, 谷传华, 王慧, 等. 初中生逆反心理与父母养育方式的关系: 人格的中介作用[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2016(5): 69-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDTJ201605011.htm HAN M, GU C H, WANG H, et al. The relationship between lower secondary school students' psychological reactance and parenting styles: the mediating effect of personality[J]. Chin J Spec Educ, 2016(5): 69-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDTJ201605011.htm
[3]	陈云辉, 李平, 姜晶. 初中生逆反心理现象学生精神卫生状况对照分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2005, 26(3): 303-304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2005.03.051 CHEN Y H, LI P, JIANG J. Contrastive analysis of mental health status of junior high school students with rebellious psychology[J]. J Qiqihar Med Univ, 2005, 26(3): 303-304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2005.03.051
[4]	王云峰, 冯维. 亲子关系研究的主要进展[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2006(7): 77-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2006.07.017 WANG Y F, FENG W. Main progress of research on parent-child relation[J]. Chin J Spec Educ, 2006(7): 77-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2006.07.017
[5]	杜云素. 缺席的父母能否弥补缺席的爱: 留守经历大学生亲子关系研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2021(6): 61-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9931.2021.06.009 DU Y S. Can absent parents make up for absent love: a study of parent-child relationship of left-behind college students[J]. China Youth Study, 2021(6): 61-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9931.2021.06.009
[6]	GUANG Y, FENG Z, YANG G, et al. Depressive symptoms and negative life events: what psycho-social factors protect or harm left-behind children in China?[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2017, 17(1): 402. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1554-1
[7]	MORAES C L, SAMPAIO P F, REICHENHEIM M E, et al. The intertwined effect of lack of emotional warmth and child abuse and neglect on common mental disorders in adolescence[J]. Child Abuse Negl, 2018, 83: 74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.008
[8]	MORDENO I G, GALLEMIT I M J S, LANTUD S S B, et al. Personal psychological resources mediate parent-child relationship and mental health among left-behind children[J]. Psych J, 2019, 8(3): 318-329. doi: 10.1002/pchj.288
[9]	CHEN P, HARRIS K M. Association of positive family relationships with mental health trajectories from adolescence to midlife[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2019, 173(12): e193336. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3336
[10]	CHEN X, ZENG C, GONG C, et al. Associations between early life parent-child separation and shortened telomere length and psychopathological outcomes during adolescence[J]. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2019, 103: 195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.01.021
[11]	曹钧. 青少年逆反心理的相关因素分析[D]. 南京: 南京医科大学, 2008. CAO J. A related study of adolescents psychological analysis[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Medical University, 2008.
[12]	吴云龙, 毛小霞, 田录梅. 亲子关系与青少年冒险行为的关系: 自控力的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(2): 367-370. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201702037.htm WU Y L, MAO X X, TIAN L M. Association of parent-child relationship with risk-taking behavior in adolescents: the mediating effect of self-control ability[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2017, 25(2): 367-370. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201702037.htm
[13]	陈永香, 崔丽蓉, 刘丽, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情期间中小学生亲子冲突及其应对[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(5): 719-722, 727. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.05.019 CHEN Y X, CUI L R, LIU L, et al. Parent-child conflict among primary and middle school students during the COVID-19 epidemic and its countermeasures[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(5): 719-722, 727. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.05.019
[14]	ZHAO C, WANG F, LI L, et al. Long-term impacts of parental migration on Chinese children's psychosocial well-being: mitigating and exacerbating factors[J]. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 2017, 52(6): 669-677. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1386-9
[15]	WANG F, LIN L, XU M, et al. Mental health among left-behind children in rural China in relation to parent-child communication[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(10): 1855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101855
[16]	XU W, YAN N, CHEN G, et al. Parent-child separation: the relationship between separation and psychological adjustment among Chinese rural children[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(4): 913-921. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1776-1
[17]	ZHOU C, LYU Q, YANG N, et al. Left-behind children, parent-child communication and psychological resilience: a structural equation modeling analysis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(10): 5123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105123
[18]	郭治斌, 林丽华. 青少年自尊、家庭亲密度及逆反心理的关系研究[J]. 福建医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 19(1): 25-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FYKS201801008.htm GUO Z B, LIN L H. Correlation study on the self-esteem, family intimacy and psychological reactance of adolescent[J]. J Fujian Med Univ(Soc Sci Ed), 2018, 19(1): 25-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FYKS201801008.htm
[19]	MISSOTTEN L C, LUYCKX K, BRANJE S, et al. Adolescents' conflict management styles with mothers: longitudinal associations with parenting and reactance[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2018, 47(2): 260-274. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0634-3
[20]	RAPP A M, LAU A, CHAVIRA D A. Differential associations between social anxiety disorder, family cohesion, and suicidality across racial/ethnic groups: findings from the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent(NCS-A)[J]. J Anx Disord, 2017, 48: 13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.09.009
[21]	杨春华. 农村留守儿童与寄宿制教育: 试析生活经验缺失对未成年人的影响[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(2): 80-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LKXB201802009.htm YANG C H. Rural left-behind children and boarding education: the impact of the lack of life experience on minors[J]. Nankai J(Philosophy Literat Soc Sci Ed), 2018(2): 80-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LKXB201802009.htm