行为激活疗法对阈下抑郁学生情绪和行为特征的影响

覃涛; 钟清玲

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.014

行为激活疗法对阈下抑郁学生情绪和行为特征的影响

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.02.014

覃涛^{1, 2},
钟清玲^2, ,

1.
江西医学高等专科学校护理学院，上饶 334000
2.
南昌大学护理学院

详细信息

作者简介:
覃涛(1985-)，女，四川达州人，在读硕士，副主任护师，主要研究方向为护理教育

通讯作者:
钟清玲，E-mail: qingling5218@163.com

利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。
中图分类号: G444 B844.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 656
- HTML全文浏览量: 310
- PDF下载量: 41
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-28
- 修回日期: 2021-12-29
- 网络出版日期: 2022-02-24
- 刊出日期: 2022-02-25

Effect of behavioral activation therapy on depressive mood and behavioral characteristics among subliminal depressed students

QIN Tao^{1, 2},
ZHONG Qingling^{2
, ,}

1.
School of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Shangrao (334000), Jiangxi Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究行为激活(behavioral activation, BA)疗法对护理专业阈下抑郁学生抑郁情绪和行为特征的应用效果，为有效开展护理专业学生的心理健康教育提供参考依据。方法采用整群抽样方法选取江西省某医学高等专科学校护理专业二年级学生614名。将符合纳入标准的60名作为研究对象，使用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和干预组，每组各30名。对照组开展一般心理健康教育，干预组在一般心理健康教育的基础上进行行为激活疗法干预。采用流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、贝克抑郁自评量表(BDI-II)和抑郁行为激活量表(BADS-SF)分别于干预前、干预结束时、干预后1个月进行测评。结果两组学生CES-D、BDI-II和BADS-SF得分的时间效应、组别效应和时间与组别的交互作用均有统计学意义(F值分别为82.78，9.65，69.92；42.19，10.52，13.50；15.59，19.61，8.49，P值均＜0.01)。干预结束时、干预后1个月，干预组CES-D和BDI-II得分(14.63±4.63，14.80±4.85；11.23±4.98，11.13±5.53)均低于对照组(22.67±6.70，22.13±5.66；17.57±9.59，18.37±7.91)，干预组BADS-SF得分高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P值均＜0.05)。结论 BA能有效改善护理专业阈下抑郁学生的抑郁症状，提高其行为激活水平，且具有持续性影响。护理教育工作者可以通过个体BA来改善护理专业学生的抑郁情绪，提升学生的心理健康水平。
- 行为 /
- 抑郁 /
- 情绪 /
- 干预性研究 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of behavioral activation (BA) therapy on depressive mood and behavioral characteristics among subliminal depressed nursing students, and to provide a reference for effective mental health education to nursing students. Methods A cluster sampling method was used to select 614 sophomore nursing students from a medical college in Jiangxi Province. Sixty subjects who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, and divided into a control group and an intervention group using a random number table method, with 30 participants in each group. The control group received general mental health education, and the intervention group participated in a BA intervention on the basis of general mental health education. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), Beck Depression Inventory-II(BDI-II) and the Behavioral Activation For Depression Scale Short-Form (BADS-SF) were used to evaluate students' depression status before, immediately after, and 1 month after the intervention, respectively. Results The time effect, group effect, and time-group interaction of the CES-D, BDI-II and BADS-SF scores of the two groups of students were all statistically significant (F=82.78, 9.65, 69.92; 42.19, 10.52, 13.50; 15.59, 19.61, 8.49, P < 0.01). Immediately after the intervention and 1 month after the intervention, the CES-D and BDI-II scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the BADS-SF score of the intervention group (14.63±4.63, 14.80±4.85; 11.23±4.98, 11.13±5.53) was significantly lower than that of the control group (22.67±6.70, 22.13±5.66; 17.57±9.59, 18.37±7.91); the differences were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion BA shows lasting effects on alleviating depressive symptoms among nursing students with subthreshold depression, improve their behavioral activation level, and have a lasting effect. Nursing educators can improve the depression of nursing students and improve their mental health through individual BA.
- Behavior /
- Depression /
- Emotions /
- Intervention studies /
- Mental health /
- Students
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突。

HTML全文

表 1 不同组别不同时间点学生CES-D、BDI-II、BADS-SF得分情况(x±s)

Table 1. Repeated measurement analysis results of CES-D, BDI-II, BADS-SF scores of students in the two groups at different time points(x±s)

组别	选项	CES-D	BDI-II	BADS-SF
组别	选项	CES-D	BDI-II	AC	AV	总分
干预组	干预前	26.63±6.29	21.20±3.70	16.37±3.69	10.47±2.92	26.83±4.54
(n=30)	干预结束时	14.63±4.63	11.23±4.98	22.27±4.46	10.37±3.06	32.63±5.97
	干预后1个月	14.80±4.85	11.13±5.53	22.43±4.08	10.37±2.24	32.80±4.89
对照组	干预前	24.03±7.20	20.77±4.30	16.77±4.37	9.23±2.98	26.00±4.17
(n=30)	干预结束时	22.67±6.70	17.57±9.59	17.43±4.07	9.30±2.74	26.73±4.38
	干预后1个月	22.13±5.66	18.37±7.91	17.70±3.98	9.33±2.71	27.03±4.68

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	秦永亭, 孟辉辉, 王晓君, 等. 运动处方对护生抑郁的干预研究[J]. 全科护理, 2019, 17(30): 3372-3374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTHS201930016.htm QIN Y T, MENG H H, WANG X J, et al. Intervention study of exercise prescription on depression of nursing students[J]. Chin Gene Pract Nurs, 2019, 17(30): 3372-3374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTHS201930016.htm
[2]	韩慧. 家庭背景因素对某高职在校护生焦虑和抑郁的影响研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2016. HAN H. Research on the effects of family background factors on anxiety and depression of nursing students in a vocational college[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2016.
[3]	BALAZS J, MIKLOSI M, KERESZTENY A, et al. Adolescent subthrehold depression and anxiety: psychopathology, functional impairment and increase suicide risk[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2013, 54(6): 670-677. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12016
[4]	FOGEL J, EATON W W, FORD D E. Minor depression as a predictor of the first onset of major depressive disorder over a 15-year follow-up[J]. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2006, 113(1): 36-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00654.x
[5]	ZEMESTANI M, DAVOODI I, HONARMAND M M, et al. Comparative effects of group metacognitive therapy versus behavioural activation in moderately depressed students[J]. J Ment Health, 2016, 25(6): 479-485. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1057326
[6]	RICHARDS D A, EKERS D, MCMILLAN D, et al. Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression(COBRA): a randomised, controlled, noninferiority trial[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10047): 871-880. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31140-0
[7]	TAKAGAKI K, OKAMOTO Y, JINNIN R, et al. Enduring effects of a 5-week behavioral activation program for subthreshold depression among late adolescents: an exploratory randomized controlled trial[J]. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treatment, 2018, 24(14): 2633-2641.
[8]	MORI A, OKAMOTO Y, OKADA G, et al. Behavioral activation can normalize neural hypoactivation in subthreshold depression during a monetary incentive delay task[J]. J Affect Disord, 2016, 36(9): 254-262.
[9]	许海莲, 吕雨梅, 何宇迪, 等. 脑卒中后阈下抑郁患者行为激活疗法干预方案的设计与验证: 预实验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(14): 1672-1677. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.427 XU H L, LYU Y M, HE Y D, et al. Design and verification of behavioral activation intervention program for post-stroke subthreshold depression: a pilot trial[J]. Chin Gene Pract, 2019, 22(14): 1672-1677. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.427
[10]	夏云丹. 行为激活疗法干预在COPD合并焦虑抑郁患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2019, 25(33): 4341-4344. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.33.018 XIA Y D. Application of behavioral activation therapy intervention in COPD patients with anxiety and depression[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2019, 25(33): 4341-4344. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.33.018
[11]	张佳媛, 周郁秋, 樊伊楠. 大庆市初高中青少年阈下抑郁情况及影响因素[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2019, 27(11): 1617-1620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201911005.htm ZHANG J Y, ZHOU Y Q, FAN Y N, et al. Prevalence rate and influencing factors of sub threshold depression among Daqing youngsters[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2019, 27(11): 1617-1620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201911005.htm
[12]	LEJUEZ C W, HOPKO D R, DAUGHTERS S B, et al. Ten year revision of the brief behavioral activation treatment for depression: revised treatment manual[J]. Behav Modific, 2011, 35(2): 111-161. doi: 10.1177/0145445510390929
[13]	王晓霞, 冯正直. 抑郁症的行为激活疗法: 临床医生手册[M]. 重庆: 西南师范大学出版社, 2017. WANG X X, FENG Z Z. Behavioral activation therapy for depression: a clinician's manual[M]. Chongqing: Southwest Normal University Press, 2017.
[14]	RADLOFF L S. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population[J]. Appl Psychol Measur, 1977, 1: 385-401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306
[15]	章婕, 吴振云, 方格, 等. 流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24(2): 139-143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.02.015 ZHANG J, WU Z Y, FANG G, et al. Development of the Chinese age norms of CESD in urban area[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2010, 24(2): 139-143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.02.015
[16]	BECK A T, STEER R A. Manual for the beck depression inventory[M]. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, 1996.
[17]	王振, 苑成梅, 黄佳, 等. 贝克抑郁量表第2版中文版在抑郁症患者中的信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(6): 476-480. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.06.014 WANG Z, YUAN C M, HUANG J, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ among depression patients[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2011, 25(6): 476-480. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.06.014
[18]	SHUDO Y, YAMAMOTO T. Assessing the relationship between quality of life and behavioral activation using the Japanese behavioral activation for depression scale-short form[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(9): 185-221.
[19]	陶晓丹. 行为活化改善抑郁的效果及可能心理机制[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018. TAO X D. The effectiveness and latent psychological mechanism of behavioral activation for depression[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018.
[20]	张明园. 精神科评定量表手册[M]. 2版. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1998: 81. ZHANG M Y. Manual of Psychiatric Rating Scale[M]. 2 ed. Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press, 1998: 81.
[21]	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 235-237. WANG X D, WANG X L, MA H. Mental Health Rating Scale Manual (Updated Edition)[M]. Beijing: Chinese Journal of Mental Health, 1999: 235-237.
[22]	代硕. 行为激活疗法在抑郁症防治中的研究进展[D]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2019. DAI S. Research progress of behavioral activation therapy in prevention and treatment of depression[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Medical University, 2019.
[23]	HOPKO D R, LEJUEZ C, RUGGIERO K J, et al. Contemporary behavioral activation treatments for depression: procedures, principles, and progress[J]. Clin Psychol Rev, 2003, 23(5): 699-717. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(03)00070-9