留守中学生抑郁焦虑症状与留守特征的相关性

王翠梅; 喻志文; 黄翔; 钟厚永; 龚玲; 王世昌; 卢金逵; 伍晓艳

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.12.016

留守中学生抑郁焦虑症状与留守特征的相关性

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.12.016

1.
赣南师范大学体育学院，江西赣州 341000
2.
赣南师范大学附属中学
3.
上饶师范学院体育学院/幼儿体育与留守儿童健康研究中心
4.
安徽医科大学儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系/人口健康与优生安徽省重点实验室

基金项目:

江西省社会科学十三五(2019)规划项目 19ZK33

详细信息

作者简介:
王翠梅(1979-)，女，江西临川人，硕士，讲师，主要研究方向为运动与心理健康

通讯作者:
龚玲，E-mail：54755374@qq.com

中图分类号: G444 B844.1 G478
计量
- 文章访问数: 640
- HTML全文浏览量: 271
- PDF下载量: 75
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-05-07
- 修回日期: 2021-10-20
- 网络出版日期: 2021-12-23
- 刊出日期: 2021-12-25

Correlation between left-behind expericences with depressive and anxiety symptoms of left-behind middle school stutents

1.
College of Physical Education, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou(341000), Jiangxi Province, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究现留守中学生抑郁症状、焦虑症状发生与留守特征(父母外出情况)的关联，为制定留守中学生抑郁与焦虑症状干预政策提供理论依据。方法采用分层随机整群抽样法，于2019年4—6月对江西上饶市鄱阳、广丰等6个县2 160名儿童进行调查，最终筛选出13~18岁留守中学生776名。运用广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)对抑郁、焦虑症状进行评价，同时采用问卷调查掌握留守中学生家庭特征及其行为生活方式。结果在性别方面，无论抑郁症状还是焦虑症状，女生检出率均高于男生；在年龄方面，高中学段(16~18岁)留守儿童抑郁症状(43.2%)和焦虑症状(39.9%)的检出率均高于初中学段(13~15岁)(27.3%，33.0%)。在抑郁症状检出率方面，留守儿童不同性别、学段组间差异均有统计学意义(χ²值分别为10.48，21.08，P值均 < 0.05)；在焦虑症状检出率方面，不同性别、母亲职业类型、父亲学历组间差异均有统计学意义(χ²值分别为8.66，5.30，8.35，P值均 < 0.05)。结论亲子分离时期会影响留守儿童抑郁症状的发生。关注中学生心理健康问题对预防控制留守儿童抑郁、焦虑症状有重要意义。
- 抑郁 /
- 焦虑 /
- 精神卫生 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between left-behind experiences due to work migration of parents with depressive and anxiety symptoms among left-behind middle school stutents, to provide a theoretical basis for the government to formulate intervention policies for mental health of left behind children. Methods The stratified random cluster sampling method was used to investigate 2 160 children in Poyang and Guangfeng Counties of Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province from April to June, 2019. Finally, 776 left-behind children aged 13 to 18 were selected. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) were used to evaluate the depression and anxiety symptoms. Family characteristics and lifestyle behaviors of left-behind children were investigated by questionnaire. Results In terms of gender, the detection rates of both depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms were higher in girls than in boys. In terms of age, the detection rates of depressive symptoms (43.2%) and anxiety symptoms (39.9%) in left-behind children in high school (16-18 years old) were higher than those in middle school (13-15 years old)(27.3% and 33.0%). The detection rate of depressive among left-behind children significantly differet in sexual, gender (χ²=10.48, 21.08); the detection rate of anxiety symptoms among left-behind children significantly different in sexual, maternal occupation, and paternal educational background (χ²=8.66, 5.30, 8.35) (P < 0.05). Conclusion Parent-child separation is associated with depressive symptoms in left-behind middle school stutents. Mental health of children in middle school stutents is of great significance to the prevention of depression and anxiety symptoms in left-behind children.
- Depression /
- Anxiety /
- Mental health /
- Child

HTML全文

表 1 不同组别留守儿童抑郁焦虑症状检出率比较

Table 1. Demographic characteristics, family status and personal life style of left-behind childrenand the detection rate of depression and anxiety symptoms

组别	人数	抑郁症状			焦虑症状			组别	人数	抑郁症状			焦虑症状
组别	人数	检出人数	χ²值	P值	检出人数	χ²值	P值	组别	人数	检出人数	χ²值	P值	检出人数	χ²值	P值
性别								初中	348	121(34.8)			121(34.8)
男	405	124(30.6)	10.48	0.00	129(31.9)	8.66	＜0.01	高中/中专	58	18(31.0)			24(41.4)
女	371	155(41.8)			156(42.0)			大学或以上	12	2(16.7)			6(50.0)
学段								家庭月收入/元
初中	352	96(27.3)	21.08	0.00	116(33.0)	3.95	0.05	≤2 000	48	16(33.3)	2.40	0.49	15(31.2)	3.48	0.32
高中	424	183(43.2)			169(39.9)			2 001~5 000	316	117(37.0)			107(33.9)
就读类型								5 001~8 000	272	103(37.9)			105(38.6)
寄宿	413	148(35.8)	0.01	0.94	151(36.6)	0.01	0.92	＞8 000	140	43(30.7)			58(41.4)
走读	363	131(36.1)			134(36.9)			每天有无剧烈运动
户口								有	341	125(36.7)	0.13	0.72	128(37.5)	0.17	0.68
城镇	91	27(29.7)	1.77	0.18	35(38.4)	0.13	0.72	无	435	154(35.4)			157(36.1)
农村	685	252(36.8)			250(36.5)			每天有无适度运动
非体力劳动	445	163(36.6)	0.21	0.65	172(38.7)	1.66	0.20	有	292	112(38.4)	1.17	0.28	105(36.0)	0.12	0.73
体力劳动	331	116(35.0)			113(34.1)			无	484	167(34.5)			180(37.2)
母亲职业类型								电视时间/(h·d^-1)
非体力劳动	361	136(37.7)	0.87	0.35	148(41.0)	5.30	0.02	不看	421	158(37.5)	3.42	0.33	160(38.0)	1.73	0.63
体力劳动	415	143(34.5)			137(33.0)			≤1	223	70(31.4)			83(37.2)
父亲学历								＞1~3	99	40(40.4)			31(31.3)
小学及以下	189	76(40.2)	3.82	0.28	78(41.3)	8.35	0.04	＞3	33	11(33.3)			11(33.3)
初中	456	161(35.3)			153(33.6)			电脑使用时间/(h·d^-1)
高中/中专	113	34(30.0)			43(38.1)			不用	430	153(35.6)	1.09	0.78	157(36.5)	3.41	0.33
大学或以上	18	8(44.4)			11(61.1)			≤1	155	56(36.1)			61(39.4)
母亲学历								＞1~3	126	43(34.1)			39(30.9)
小学及以下	358	138(38.5)	3.81	0.28	134(37.4)	2.10	0.55	＞3	65	27(41.5)			28(43.0)
注： ()内数字为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同留守特征留守儿童抑郁焦虑症状检出率比较

Table 2. Comparison of the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms among left-behind children with defferent left-behind characteristics

留守特征	人数	抑郁症状			焦虑症状			留守特征	人数	抑郁症状			焦虑症状
留守特征	人数	检出人数	χ²值	P值	检出人数	χ²值	P值	留守特征	人数	检出人数	χ²值	P值	检出人数	χ²值	P值
父亲外出开始时儿童年龄/岁								母亲外出开始时儿童年龄/岁
≤3	284	173(60.9)	13.69	0.02	182(64.1)	2.73	0.74	≤3	188	120(63.8)	5.18	0.39	115(61.2)	1.45	0.92
＞3~6	148	93(62.8)			90(60.8)			＞3~6	127	77(60.6)			81(63.8)
＞6~9	151	113(74.8)			103(68.2)			＞6~9	112	76(67.9)			74(66.1)
＞9~12	95	64(67.4)			59(62.1)			＞9~12	98	67(68.4)			64(65.3)
＞12~15	71	40(56.3)			44(62.0)			＞12~15	97	59(60.8)			59(60.8)
＞15~18	8	3(37.5)			4(50.0)			＞15~18	39	20(51.3)			23(59.0)
父亲外出结束时儿童年龄/岁								母亲外出结束时儿童年龄/岁
≤6	53	33(62.3)	17.02	＜0.01	34(64.2)	4.65	0.33	≤6	52	35(67.3)	14.28	0.01	37(71.2)	7.41	0.12
＞6~9	65	45(69.2)			44(67.7)			＞6~9	70	47(67.1)			49(70.0)
＞9~12	98	67(68.4)			59(60.2)			＞9~12	97	65(67.0)			60(61.9)
＞12~15	267	190(71.2)			181(67.8)			＞12~15	223	155(69.5)			146(65.5)
＞15~18	274	151(55.1)			164(59.9)			＞15~18	219	117(53.4)			124(56.6)
父亲外出年限/年								母亲外出年限/年
≤1	78	55(70.5)	6.19	0.29	53(67.9)	4.78	0.44	≤1	67	50(74.6)	7.72	0.17	43(64.2)	1.66	0.89
＞1~3	140	95(67.9)			94(67.1)			＞1~3	134	89(66.4)			88(65.7)
＞3~5	109	66(60.6)			61(56.0)			＞3~5	99	58(58.6)			62(62.6)
＞5~10	190	125(65.8)			121(63.7)			＞5~10	174	109(62.6)			112(64.4)
＞10~15	194	121(62.4)			126(64.9)			＞10~15	155	97(62.6)			92(59.4)
＞15	46	24(52.2)			27(58.7)			＞15	32	16(50.0)			19(59.4)
注： ()内数字为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	李鸿, 吕钦谕, 易正辉. 抑郁症合并焦虑症患者自杀态度调查及其与病情、应对方式的关系探讨[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(12): 2069-2073. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYQY201912024.htm LI H, LYU Q Y, YI Z H. Investigation of suicide attitudes and its relationship with illness conditions and coping styles in patients with depression combined with anxiety disorder[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2019, 17(12): 2069-2073. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYQY201912024.htm
[2]	岳莉莉, 柏光泽. 抑郁症与焦虑障碍的研究现状[J]. 医学综述, 2013, 19(6): 1069-1072. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2013.06.038 YUE L L, BAI G Z. Research status of depression and anxiety disorders[J]. Med Recapit, 2013, 19(6): 1069-1072. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2013.06.038
[3]	李晓娟, 刘群, 马庆宇, 等. 焦虑症引起免疫系统异常机制及中医药研究探讨[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2016, 31(12): 5171-5174. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BXYY201612077.htm LI X J, LIU Q, MA Q Y, et al. Discussion on mechanism of immunological changes caused by anxiety disorder and the research of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Chin J Tradit Chin Med Pharm, 2016, 31(12): 5171-5174. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BXYY201612077.htm
[4]	谭秋晓, 曾静, 李荔. 多囊卵巢综合征与焦虑症或抑郁症共病的研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(23): 3841-3845. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2018.23.002 TAN Q X, ZENG J, LI L. Research progress of comorbidity between anxiety, depression and polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. J Pract Med, 2018, 34(23): 3841-3845. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2018.23.002
[5]	李晓英, 张心华, 姜秋波. 选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂类药物在儿童青少年中使用的自杀风险研究进展[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2020, 29(18): 2098-2102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2020.18.009 LI X Y, ZHANG X H, JIANG Q B. Research progress in the risk of SSRIs for causing suicide in children and adolescents[J]. Chin J New Drug, 2020, 29(18): 2098-2102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2020.18.009
[6]	张敏莉, 韩娟, 丁慧思, 等. 青少年创伤经历与抑郁症状及人格特征的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33(1): 52-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.01.010 ZHANG M L, HAN J, DING H S, et al. Relationship among trauma experiences, depressive symptoms and personality traits in adolescents[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2019, 33(1): 52-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.01.010
[7]	王虔, 林延敏, 卢金逵, 等. 赣东北地区留守儿童抑郁症状现况及影响因素[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(8): 1241-1243. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.08.032 WANG Q, LIN Y M, LU J K, et al. Status and influencing factors of depressive symptoms in left behind children in Northeast Jiangxi[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(8): 1241-1243. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.08.032
[8]	刘春飞. 足球运动游戏对农村留守儿童一般社会适应能力的影响研究[D]. 郑州: 河南师范大学, 2019. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10476-1019232420.htm LIU C F. Research on the influence of football on the social adaptability of left-behind children in rural areas[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Normal University, 2019. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10476-1019232420.htm
[9]	吴重涵, 戚务念. 留守儿童家庭结构中的亲代在位[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 12(6): 86-101. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/e6afcdcc094c2e3f5727a5e9856a561253d321fb?fr=xueshu20001 WU Z H, QI W N. Parental generational tenure in the family structure of left-behind children[J]. J East Norm Univ(Educ Sci), 2020, 12(6): 86-101. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/e6afcdcc094c2e3f5727a5e9856a561253d321fb?fr=xueshu20001
[10]	王向清, 崔雅稚. 农村留守儿童情感缺失问题研究: 以湖南益阳H区为例[J]. 湖南财政经济学院学报, 2016, 32(3): 60-69. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ba773a13acaad1f34693daef5ef7ba0d4b736df0?fr=xueshu20001 WANG X Q, CUI Y Z. Problems and countermeasures on lack of emotion of rural left-behind children: taking H Area in Yiyang City, Hunan Province for example[J]. J Hunan Financ Econom Univ, 2016, 32(3): 60-69. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ba773a13acaad1f34693daef5ef7ba0d4b736df0?fr=xueshu20001
[11]	缪华灵, 郭成, 王亭月, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情下留守儿童社会适应水平及其与家庭亲密度的关系: 心理素质的中介作用[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 31-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XNND202101004.htm MIAO H L, GUO C, WANG T Y, et al. Social adaptation of left-behind children and its relationship with family cohesion during the COVID-19 epidemic: the mediating role of psychological Suzhi[J]. J Southwest Univ(Nat Sci Edit), 2021, 43(1): 31-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XNND202101004.htm
[12]	全国妇联, 教育部, 中央文明办, 等. 关于印发《全国家庭教育指导大纲(修订)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2019-05-14)[2021-03-23]. http://www.yueyang.gov.cn/yywomen/53944/content-1535437.html. All-China Women'S Federation, Minisery of Education, Central Civilization Office, et al. Issuance of the national family education guidelines notice[EB/OL]. (2019-05-14)[2021-03-23]. http://www.yueyang.gov.cn/yywomen/53944/content-1535437.html.
[13]	段成荣. 解决留守儿童问题的根本在于止住源头[J]. 武汉大学学报(人文科学版), 2016, 69(2): 15-18. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1dcbd3265af5f61fb7360b4c2e3f5727a4e92453?fr=xueshu20001 DUAN C R. The root of solving the problem of left behind children lies in stopping the source[J]. Wuhan Univ J(Human Soc Sci), 2016, 69(2): 15-18. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1dcbd3265af5f61fb7360b4c2e3f5727a4e92453?fr=xueshu20001
[14]	胡启权. 不同强度体育锻炼对提升高校学生心理健康和心理韧性的效果评价[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(1): 83-85. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.01.022 HU Q Q. The Effect of increased intensity of physical exercises on mental health and resilience among college students[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019, 40(1): 83-85. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.01.022
[15]	YEUNG A S, JING Y, BRENNEMAN S K, et al. Clinical outcomes in measurement-based treatment(Comet): a trial of depression monitoring and feedback to primary care physicians[J]. Depress Anx, 2012, 29(10): 865-873. doi: 10.1002/da.21983
[16]	KROENKE K, SPITZER R L, WILLIAMS J B W. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure[J]. J Gen Int Med, 2001, 16(9): 606-613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
[17]	曲姗, 史欣欣, 谢稚鹃, 等. 病人健康问卷和广泛性焦虑量表在非心源性胸痛患者中筛查抑郁焦虑的效度和信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2021, 35(5): 376-381. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2021.05.005 QU S, SHI X X, XIE Z J, et al. Validity and reliability of the patient health questionnaire and the generalized anxiety scale for screening depressive anxiety in patients with non-cardiac chest pain[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2021, 35(5): 376-381. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2021.05.005
[18]	曲姗, 胜利. 广泛性焦虑量表在综合医院心理科门诊筛查广泛性焦虑障碍的诊断试验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(12): 939-943. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.12.010 QU S, SHENG L. Diagnostic test of screening generalized anxiety disorders in general hospital psychological department with GAD-7[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2015, 29(12): 939-943. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.12.010
[19]	凌辉, 张建人, 易艳, 等. 分离年龄和留守时间对留守儿童行为和情绪问题的影响[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2012, 20(5): 674-678. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/23ab91c2fe4ffe4733687e21af45b307e971f9cc?fr=xueshu20001 LING H, ZHANG J R, YI Y, et al. Impact of the age and duration separated from parents on left-home-kids' behaviors and emotions[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2012, 20(5): 674-678. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/23ab91c2fe4ffe4733687e21af45b307e971f9cc?fr=xueshu20001
[20]	徐文健, 冯廷勇. 留守年龄对留守儿童主观幸福感的影响: 人格的中介作用[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43(3): 95-102. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/98a57f56d3f34693daef5ef7ba0d4a7303766c19?fr=xueshu20001 XU W J, FENG T Y. The influence of left-behind age on left-behind children's subjective well being: the mediating role of personality[J]. J Southwest Univ(Soc Sci Ed), 2017, 43(3): 95-102. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/98a57f56d3f34693daef5ef7ba0d4a7303766c19?fr=xueshu20001
[21]	李海云, 魏衍. 我国留守儿童家庭教育现状及对策研究[J]. 教育评论, 2019, 37(10): 53-57. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JYPL201910010.htm LI H Y, WEI Y. Study on the status and countermeasures of family education of left-behind children in China[J]. Educational Review, 2019, 37(10): 53-57. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JYPL201910010.htm
[22]	张婷皮美, 石智雷. 父母外出务工对农村留守儿童心理健康的影响研究[J]. 西北人口, 2021, 42(4): 31-43. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=1000002329453 ZHANG T P M, SHI Z L. A Study on the impact of parents' migrant workers on the mental health of left-behind children in rural areas[J]. Northwest Popul, 2021, 42(4): 31-43. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=1000002329453
[23]	张萍, 赵参参, 李鹏, 等. 青少年抑郁的心理影响因素及其神经机制[J]. 心理研究, 2017, 10(1): 78-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1159.2017.01.011 ZHANG P, ZHAO C C, LI P, et al. The psychological factors and neural mechanisms in depressed adolescents[J]. Psychol Res, 2017, 10(1): 78-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1159.2017.01.011