Rush use and related factors among HIV-positive young male students in Beijing
-
摘要:
目的 了解北京市青年男性学生HIV感染者Rush使用情况及相关因素,为开展宣传干预工作提供建议。 方法 选取2017年1月1日至2020年6月30日中国疾病预防控制中心预防控制信息系统艾滋病综合防治信息系统中报告的现住址为北京市的200名青年男性学生HIV感染者,采用SPSS 20.0进行统计分析。 结果 感染前Rush使用比例为46.00%(92名);感染前发生过同性性行为的比例为92.00%(184名);多因素Logistic分析结果显示,感染前以互联网为主要方式结识性伴(OR=3.84,95%CI=1.65~8.96)、饮酒(OR=3.26,95%CI=1.51~7.02)、参与过多人同性性行为(OR=4.84,95%CI=1.71~13.71)、感染前被诊断过性病(OR=2.23,95%CI=1.02~4.87)均与使用Rush相关(P值均 < 0.05)。 结论 北京市青年男性学生HIV感染者感染前Rush使用率较高;可加强政府监管并通过加强对学生的健康宣教,预防药物滥用。 Abstract:Objective This study investigated the use of rush and related factors among HIV-positive male students in Beijing, and provided suggestions for education and intervention. Methods Data on HIV-positive male students was collected from 2017 to June 30, 2020 in Beijing and analyzed in SPSS 20.0. Results A total of 200 valid questionnaires were collected. The mean age at HIV diagnosis was (22.18±2.70) years. The rate of using rush was 46.00%. The proportion with homosexual behavior before infection was 92.00%. The results of multivariate analysis showed that meeting sexual partners through the Internet(OR=3.84, 95%CI=1.65-8.96), drinking alcohol(OR=3.26, 95%CI=1.51-7.02), group homosexual behavior(OR=4.84, 95%CI=1.71-13.71), and STD diagnosis (OR=0.23, 95%CI=1.02-4.87) were associated with the use of rush before infection. Conclusion The rate of rush use was higher among male students infected with HIV. Government regulation could be strengthened and drug abuse could be prevented through better health education for students. -
Key words:
- HIV /
- Substance-related disorders /
- Health education /
- Regression analysis /
- Students /
- Male
-
表 1 北京市男性学生HIV感染者使用Rush的单因素分析
Table 1. Single factor analysis of Rush use among male students infected with HIV in Beijing
变量 人数 Rush使用人数 χ2值 P值 学业阶段 专科 28 14(50.00) 1.18 0.56 本科 119 51(42.86) 硕士/博士 53 27(50.94) 生长环境 城市 148 63(42.57) 2.70 0.10 农村 52 29(55.77) 居住状况 学生宿舍 139 65(46.76) 0.11 0.74 其他 61 27(44.26) 是否来自单亲家庭 否 168 74(44.05) 1.61 0.21 是 32 18(56.25) 感染前结识性伴的主要方式 非互联网 122 68(55.74) 14.04 <0.01 互联网 78 23(29.49) 感染前性伴的主要来源 在校生 54 13(24.07) 14.65 <0.01 校外朋友 64 35(54.69) 网友 77 42(51.92) 感染前是否吸烟 否 148 65(43.92) 0.99 0.32 是 52 27(51.92) 感染前是否饮酒 否 124 49(39.52) 5.52 0.02 是 76 43(56.58) 感染前性行为发生情况 仅发生过异性性行为 13 1(7.69) 8.78 0.01 异性、同性性行为均发生过 33 18(54.55) 仅发生过同性性行为 141 67(47.52) 感染前是否与同性发生肛交 否 36 9(25.00) 8.92 <0.01 是 146 77(52.74) 感染前是否参与过多人同性性行为 否 146 58(39.73) 14.61 <0.01 是 31 24(77.42) 感染前是否被诊断过性病 否 138 54(39.13) 8.46 <0.01 是 62 38(61.29) 注: ()内数字为报告率/%;部分项目有缺失。 表 2 北京市男性学生HIV感染者使用Rush的多因素Logistic回归分析(n=200)
Table 2. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of Rush use among male students infected with HIV in Beijing(n=200)
变量 选项 β值 标准误 Wald χ2值 P值 OR值(OR值95%CI) 感染前结识性伴的主要方式 非互联网 1.00 互联网 1.35 0.43 9.71 <0.01 3.84(1.65~8.96) 感染前性伴的主要来源 在校生 1.00 校外朋友 0.84 0.48 3.00 0.08 2.31(0.90~5.95) 网友 0.82 0.47 3.09 0.08 2.27(0.91~5.65) 感染前是否饮酒 否 1.00 是 1.18 0.39 9.08 <0.01 3.26(1.51~7.02) 感染前性行为发生情况 仅发生过异性性行为 1.00 仅发生过同性性行为 1.54 1.18 1.71 0.19 4.68(1.51~47.29) 均发生过 2.22 1.21 3.35 0.07 9.18(0.85~98.53) 感染前是否与同性发生肛交 否 1.00 是 0.23 0.49 0.21 0.65 1.25(0.48~3.27) 感染前是否参与过多人同性性行为 否 1.00 是 1.58 0.53 8.81 <0.01 4.84(1.71~13.71) 感染前是否被诊断过性病 否 1.00 是 0.80 0.40 4.02 0.05 2.23(1.02~4.87) -
[1] LUO W, HONG H, WANG X, et al. Synthetic drug use and HIV infection among men who have sex with men in China: a sixteen-city, cross-sectional survey[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(7): e200816. http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM30063747 [2] 李咏泽. 中国7省市MSM及其亚人群HIV新发感染率与危险因素研究[D]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2014. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/Y2599045LI Y Z. The incidence of HIV and associated risk factors among MSM and subgroups of MSM in 7 major cities of China[D]. Shenyang: China Medical University, 2014. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/Y2599045 [3] ROMANELLI F, SMITH K M, THORNTON A C, et al. Poppers: epidemiology and clinical management of inhaled nitrite abuse[J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2004, 24(1): 69-78. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.1.69.34801 [4] ZHAO P, TANG S, WANG C, et al. Recreational drug use among Chinese MSM and transgender individuals: results from a national online cross-sectional study[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1): e170024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28107391 [5] 段青, 康殿民. MSM人群新型毒品滥用研究进展[J]. 中国药物滥用防治杂志, 2017, 23(4): 244-248. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZYLF201704022.htmDUAN Q, KANG D M. Research progress on new-type drug abuse in MSM Population[J]. Chin J Drug Abuse Prev Treat, 2017, 23(4): 244-248. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZYLF201704022.htm [6] ROMANELLI F, SMITH K M, THORNTON A C, et al. Poppers: epidemiology and clinical management of inhaled nitrite abuse[J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2004, 24(1): 69-78. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.1.69.34801 [7] 车宁, 封宇飞, 孙春华. 216例药源性眼部损害文献分析[J]. 中国药物应用与监测, 2011, 8(5): 300-302, 305. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8157.2011.05.014CHE N, FENG Y F, SUN C H. Analysis on 216 cases of drug-induced ocular in juries[J]. Chin J Drug Appl Monit, 2011, 8(5): 300-302, 305. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8157.2011.05.014 [8] 罗莉, 曹琳, 胡荣, 等. 2016年武汉市新报告男男性行为HIV感染者Rush poppers使用情况及相关因素[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2018, 52(12): 1287-1289. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.12.018LUO L, CAO L, HU R, et al. Status and associated factors of rush poppers use among newly-diagnosed HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Wuhan, 2016[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2018, 52(12): 1287-1289. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.12.018 [9] 陈梦清, 程伟彬, 徐慧芳, 等. 广东省825名学生男男性行为人群Rush poppers使用情况及其影响因素[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2016, 50(11): 949-953. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.11.006CHEN M Q, CHENG W B, XU H F, et al. Predictors of Rush popper use among 825 men who have sex with men in education in Guangdong Province[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2016, 50(11): 949-953. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.11.006 [10] 王娟, 贺淑芳, 卢红艳, 等. 北京市2010-2016年15~24岁学生艾滋病疫情状况[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2017, 38(9): 1426-1428. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.09.047WANG J, HE S F, LU H Y, et al. HIV/AIDS epidemic situation among young students in Beijing City during 2010-2016[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2017, 38(9): 1426-1428. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.09.047 [11] 孙经. 毒品依赖者童年期虐待及相关因素分析[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2010. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10459-1011017548.htmSUN J. The analysis of child abuse and relative factors in drug dependents[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2010. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10459-1011017548.htm [12] 康媛媛, 李胜, 向芳, 等. 男男性接触人群网络交友现状及特征分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2020, 36(3): 250-254. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zgjkjy202003014KANG Y Y, LI S, XIANG F, et al. Analysis on situation and characteristics of online dating among MSM[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2020, 36(3): 250-254. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zgjkjy202003014 [13] ZOU H, FAN S. Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and implications for HIV interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Sex Behav, 2017, 46(4): 885-894. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0709-3 [14] 罗倩倩, 陈子煌, 马跃, 等. 2017年北京市使用某手机社交软件的男男性行为人群感染HIV风险及相关因素[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2018, 52(12): 1220-1224. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.12.005LUO Q Q, CHEN Z H, MA Y, et al. Risk of HIV infection and its factors among men who have sex with men: a geosocial networking application-based suivey in Beijing of China, 2017[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2018, 52(12): 1220-1224. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.12.005 [15] JONES J, SALAZAR L F. A review of HIV prevention studies that use social networking sites: implications for recruitment, health promotion campaigns, and efficacy trials[J]. AIDS Behav, 2016, 20(11): 2772-2781. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1342-9 [16] 张德川, 陈子煌, 马跃, 等. 北京市学生男男性行为人群无保护性行为相关因素的定性研究[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2018, 52(12): 1234-1238. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.12.008ZHANG D C, CHEN Z H, MA Y, et al. Qualitative study on unprotected sexual behaviors among male students who have sex with men in Beijing[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2018, 52(12): 1234-1238. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.12.008 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 775
- HTML全文浏览量: 309
- PDF下载量: 40
- 被引次数: 0