贵阳市2014—2020年学生肺结核患者发现就诊及确诊延迟影响因素分析

白璐璐; 陈洪; 黄延; 张彬兵; 田永琴

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.12.005

贵阳市2014—2020年学生肺结核患者发现就诊及确诊延迟影响因素分析

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.12.005

贵州省贵阳市疾病预防控制中心结核病防治科，550000

详细信息

作者简介:
白璐璐(1992-)，女，贵州遵义人，硕士，主治医师，主要从事结核病防控工作

通讯作者:
陈洪，E-mail：994175146@qq.com

中图分类号: R521 G478
计量
- 文章访问数: 632
- HTML全文浏览量: 263
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-21
- 修回日期: 2021-08-30
- 网络出版日期: 2021-12-23
- 刊出日期: 2021-12-25

Determinants of the delay in case-finding, treatment, and diagnosis among students tuberculosis patients in Guiyang from 2014 to 2020

Department of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Guiyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guiyang (550000), China

摘要

摘要: 目的对2014—2020年贵阳市学生肺结核患者发现、就诊及确诊延迟影响因素进行分析，为贵阳市学生肺结核防控工作提供参考依据。方法通过《结核病管理信息系统》收集2014—2020年贵阳市学生肺结核患者病案信息，分析学生肺结核患者发现、就诊、确诊延迟的基本情况及变化趋势，采用χ²检验及多因素Logistic回归模型分析3类延迟的影响因素。结果 2014—2020年贵阳市学生肺结核患者发现、就诊延迟率总体呈上升趋势(χ_趋势²值分别为20.70，31.03，P值均 < 0.05)。2014—2020年贵阳市共报告1 323例有效病例，发现天数中位数为16 d，发现延迟率为48.75%;就诊天数中位数是11 d，就诊延迟率为43.46%;确诊天数中位数为0 d，确诊延迟率为11.87%。多因素Logistic回归模型分析显示，流动人口与发现延迟呈正相关(OR=1.45)，患者来源分类为其他(OR=0.19)、首诊单位级别是县级(OR=0.44)、首诊单位类型为综合医院(OR=0.58)与学生肺结核发现延迟均呈负相关(P值均 < 0.05)。女生(OR=1.32)、流动人口(OR=1.38)与就诊延迟均呈正相关(P值均 < 0.01)。流动人口(OR=1.51)、非重症(OR=5.99)、近城区(OR=2.76)、远城区(OR=4.30)与发生确诊延迟均呈正相关(P值均 < 0.05)，女生(OR=0.65)、少数民族(OR=0.38)、学段为大中专(OR=0.53)、首诊单位类型为专科医院(OR=0.22)与确诊延迟发生均呈负相关(P值均 < 0.05)。结论贵阳市学生肺结核发现、就诊延迟的情况较为普遍。应针对性制定防控措施，降低学生延迟发生率，减少学校结核聚集性疫情的发生风险。
- 结核，肺 /
- 诊断 /
- 回归分析 /
- 学生
Abstract: Objective To analyze factors affecting the delay in the case-finding, treatment and diagnosis of tuberculosis among students during 2014-2020, and to provide a reference for the prevention and control measures of tuberculosis among students in Guiyang City. Methods The medical cases of students with tuberculosis from 2014 to 2020 recorded by "China Disease Prevention and Control Information System" were collected and trend of delays in the detection, treatment, and diagnosis of students with tuberculosis were analyzed, and χ² test and multivariate Logistic regression were used to analyze influencing factors. Results From 2014 to 2020, the rate of delay in the case-finding, treatment, and diagnosis of tuberculosis among students in Guiyang showed a relatively stable trend. From 2014 to 2020, Guiyang City reported a total of 1 323 valid cases, the median number of case-finding was 16 days, and 48.75% of student TB patients were delayed; the median number of treatment was 11 days, the delay rate of treatment was 43.46%; the median number of diagnosis was 0 day, the diagnosis delay rate was 11.87%. The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the floating population was a risk factor for delay in case-finding (OR=1.45), the classification of the source of patients as "other" (OR=0.19), the level of the first diagnosed unit was county (OR=0.44), and the type of the first diagnosed unit was general hospital (OR=0.58) were the protective factors for the delayed case-finding of tuberculosis in students(P < 0.05). Female (OR=1.32) and floating population (OR=1.38) were risk factors for delayed treatment. Floating population (OR=1.51), rural areas (OR=4.30), urban fringe (OR=2.76), non-severe patients (OR=5.99) were risk factors for delayed diagnosis, females (OR=0.65), ethnic minorities (OR=0.38), college degree (OR=0.53), and the first diagnosis unit wae a specialist hospital (OR=0.22) were protective factors for delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis in students (P < 0.05). Conclusion The rates of tuberculosis case-finding and treatment delay among students are common, which warrants targeted prevention and control measures to reduce the incidence of student delays and reduce the risk of tuberculosis cluster epidemics in schools.
- Tuberculosis, pulmonary /
- Diagnosis /
- Regression analysis /
- Students

HTML全文

表 1 贵阳市2014—2020年学生肺结核患者发现、就诊、确诊延迟影响因素的单因素分析

Table 1. Single factor analysis of influencing factors for the case-finding, treatment and diagnosis of tuberculosis among students in Guiyang from 2014 to 2020

因素	项目	人数	发现延迟			就诊延迟			确诊延迟
因素	项目	人数	检出人数	χ²值	P值	检出人数	χ²值	P值	检出人数	χ²值	P值
性别	男	642	297(46.26)	3.10	0.08	256(39.88)	6.53	0.01	91(14.17)	6.35	0.01
	女	681	348(51.10)			319(46.84)			66(9.69)
民族	汉族	1 079	525(48.66)	0.02	0.89	459(42.54)	2.03	0.17	141(13.07)	8.06	0.01
	少数民族	244	120(49.18)			116(47.54)			16(6.56)
学段	小学	59	31(52.54)	9.68	0.02	27(45.76)	5.12	0.16	7(11.86)	15.25	< 0.01
	初中	199	103(51.76)			96(48.24)			18(9.05)
	高中	436	186(42.66)			172(39.45)			35(8.03)
	大中专	629	325(51.67)			280(44.52)			97(15.42)
户籍类型	本地	790	354(44.81)	12.20	< 0.01	319(40.38)	7.58	0.01	76(9.62)	9.46	< 0.01
	外地	533	291(54.60)			256(48.03)			81(15.20)
户籍地	主城区	353	173(49.01)			149(42.21)			49(13.88)
	近城区	373	199(53.35)	5.35	0.07	170(45.58)	0.99	0.61	75(20.11)	48.53	< 0.01
	远城区	597	273(45.73)			256(42.88)			33(5.53)
诊断结果	病原学阳性	388	206(53.09)	6.32	0.04	184(47.42)	7.20	0.03	43(11.08)	0.82	0.67
	病原学阴性	918	428(46.62)			380(41.39)			111(12.09)
	无病原学结果	17	11(64.71)			11(64.71)			3(17.65)
治疗分类	初治	1 295	627(48.42)	2.76	0.07	557(43.01)	5.05	0.03	156(12.05)	1.88	0.17
	复治	28	18(64.29)			18(64.29)			1(3.57)
患者来源	转诊及追踪	929	491(52.85)	37.16	< 0.01	438(47.15)	33.86	< 0.01	129(13.89)	13.92	0.01
	因症就诊	301	130(43.19)			118(39.20)			23(7.64)
	因症推荐	10	5(50.00)			5(50.00)			0
	健康检查	69	12(17.39)			9(13.04)			3(4.35)
	其他	14	7(50.00)			5(35.71)			2(14.29)
首诊医院级别	县级	1 251	598(47.80)	8.33	< 0.01	526(42.05)	18.74	< 0.01	155(12.39)	6.02	0.01
	乡级	72	47(65.28)			49(68.06)			2(2.78)
首诊单位类型	疾病预防控制中心	193	94(48.70)	9.87	0.02	79(40.93)	26.31	< 0.01	36(18.65)	16.61	< 0.01
	乡镇医院	72	47(65.28)			49(68.06)			2(2.78)
	专科医院	118	50(42.37)			36(30.51)			18(15.25)
	综合医院	940	454(48.30)			411(43.72)			101(10.74)
是否重症	是	95	47(49.47)	0.02	0.88	49(51.58)	2.74	0.10	2(2.11)	9.33	< 0.01
	否	1 228	598(48.70)			526(42.83)			155(12.62)
注： ()内数字为检出率/%。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 贵阳市2014—2020年学生肺结核患者发现、就诊、确诊延迟影响因素的多因素Logistic回归分析(n=1 323)

Table 2. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of factors affecting the case-finding, treatment and diagnosis of tuberculosis among students in Guiyang City from 2014 to 2020(n=1 323)

因变量	自变量	选项	β值	标准误	Wald χ²值	P值	OR值(OR值95%CI)
发现延迟	学段	初中	0.07	0.28	0.06	0.80	1.07(0.62~1.87)
		高中	0.05	1.71	0.10	0.75	1.06(0.76~1.48)
		大中专	-0.29	0.13	5.00	0.25	0.75(0.58~0.96)
	户籍类型	流动人口	0.37	0.12	9.49	< 0.01	1.45(1.15~1.90)
	诊断结果	病原学阳性	-0.64	0.52	1.55	0.21	0.53(0.19~1.44)
		无病原学结果	-0.43	0.52	0.67	0.41	0.65(0.24~1.81)
	患者来源	因症就诊	0.17	0.55	0.10	0.75	1.18(0.41~3.45)
		因症推荐	-0.22	0.55	0.16	0.69	0.80(0.27~2.38)
		健康检查	-0.73	0.88	0.68	0.41	0.48(0.09~2.70)
		其他	-1.67	0.64	6.84	0.01	0.19(0.05~0.66)
	首诊单位级别	县级	-0.82	0.30	7.65	0.01	0.44(0.25~0.79)
	首诊单位类型	乡级医院	-0.12	0.16	0.54	0.46	0.89(0.65~1.22)
		综合医院	-0.55	0.21	6.97	0.01	0.58(0.38~0.87)
就诊延迟	性别	女	0.28	0.12	5.90	0.02	1.32(1.06~1.66)
	户籍类型	流动人口	0.32	0.12	6.97	0.01	1.38(1.09~1.76)
	诊断结果	病原学阳性	-0.89	0.52	2.99	0.08	0.41(0.15~1.13)
		无病原学结果	-0.72	0.52	1.88	0.17	0.49(0.18~1.36)
	治疗分类	复治	0.69	0.41	2.80	0.95	2.00(0.89~4.49)
	患者来源	因症就诊	0.57	0.57	0.98	0.32	1.76(0.57~5.42)
		因症推荐	0.23	0.58	0.16	0.69	1.26(0.40~3.95)
		健康检查	-0.46	0.90	0.26	0.61	0.63(0.11~3.67)
		其他	-1.57	0.69	5.16	0.02	0.21(0.05~0.81)
	首诊单位级别	县级	0.10	0.06	3.11	0.08	1.10(0.99~1.23)
	首诊单位类型	乡级医院	-0.24	0.16	2.19	0.14	0.79(0.57~1.08)
		专科医院	1.22	0.31	15.32	< 0.01	3.40(1.84~6.27)
		综合医院	-0.87	0.22	15.49	< 0.01	0.42(0.27~0.65)
确诊延迟	性别	女	-0.43	0.18	5.73	0.02	0.65(0.46~0.93)
(n=157)	民族	少数民族	-0.96	0.28	11.44	< 0.01	0.38(0.22~0.67)
	学段	中学	-0.23	0.43	0.28	0.60	0.80(0.34~1.85)
		高中	-0.50	0.28	3.13	0.08	0.61(0.35~1.06)
		大中专	-0.63	0.22	8.20	< 0.01	0.53(0.35~0.82)
	户籍类型	流动人口	0.41	0.19	4.70	0.03	1.51(1.04~2.18)
	户籍地	近城区	1.01	0.24	18.41	< 0.01	2.76(1.73~4.38)
		远城区	1.46	0.22	43.65	< 0.01	4.30(2.79~6.63)
	患者来源	因症就诊	-1.23	1.04	1.41	0.24	0.29(0.04~2.23)
		因症推荐	-0.05	0.18	0.10	0.76	0.95(0.67~1.34)
		健康检查	-0.97	0.61	2.58	0.11	0.38(0.12~1.24)
		其他	0.12	0.78	0.02	0.88	1.13(0.24~5.22)
	首诊单位级别	县级	-1.26	1.03	1.49	0.22	0.28(0.04~2.15)
	首诊单位类型	乡级医院	0.37	0.22	2.71	0.10	1.44(0.93~2.22)
		专科医院	-1.50	0.74	4.11	0.04	0.22(0.05~0.95)
		综合医院	-0.13	0.30	0.19	0.66	0.88(0.49~1.58)
	是否重症	否	1.79	0.73	6.09	0.01	5.99(1.45~24.85)
注：变量性别以男生为参照，民族以汉族为参照; 学段以小学为参照; 诊断结果以病原学阴性为参照; 户籍类型以本地人口为参照; 户籍地以主城区为参照; 患者来源以转诊及追踪为参照; 治疗分类以初治为参照; 首诊断单位级别以乡级为参照; 首诊断单位类型以疾病预防控制中心为参照; 是否重症以是为参照。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	BURKI T K. The global cost of tuberculosis Science Direct[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2018, 6(1): 13-15. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000040162408810_25ea.html
[2]	马晓雪, 郭雪丽, 陈慧娟, 等. 贵州省学生肺结核就诊延迟特征及影响因素分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48(17): 3210-3215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202117033.htm MA X X, GUO X L, CHEN H J, et al. Delay of pulmonary tuberculosis care-seeking and its influencing factors among students in Guizhou Province[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2021, 48(17): 3210-3215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202117033.htm
[3]	王黎霞, 成诗明, 陈伟. 学校结核病防治工作手册[M]. 北京: 军事医学科学出版社, 2012. WANG L X, CHENG S M, CHEN W. Handbook of tuberculosis control in schools[M]. Beijing: Military Medical Science Press, 2012.
[4]	ASEFA A, TESHOME W. Total delay in treatment among smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in five primary health centers, Southern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e102884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102884
[5]	李康, 黄时勇, 刘美良, 等. 2015年广西宾阳县肺结核流行现状及其发现延迟影响因素分析[J]. 医学动物防制, 2018, 34(9): 817-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXDZ201809001.htm LI K, HUANG S Y, LIU M L, et al. Analysis of the prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and the factors associated with the delay of tuberculosis identifiction in Binyang County of Guangxi in 2015[J]. J Med Pest Control, 2018, 34(9): 817-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXDZ201809001.htm
[6]	SREERAMAREDDY C T, PANDURU K V, MENTEN J, et al. Time delays in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review of literature[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2009, 9(1): 91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-91
[7]	胡洁, 顾伟玲, 王远航, 等. 2010—2019年浙江省嘉兴市学生肺结核患者发现延误及其影响因素分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(8): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJC202110012.htm HU J, GU W L, WANG Y H, et al. Influencing factors of case-finding delay among student pulmonary TB patients in Jiaxing from 2010 to 2019[J]. Dis Surveill, 2021, 36(8): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBJC202110012.htm
[8]	孙宏英, 段晋超, 严昌武, 等. 四川省绵阳市2014—2018年学生结核病患者就诊延迟特征分析[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2019, 8(2): 90-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBJK201902005.htm SUN H Y, DUAN J C, YANG C W, et al. Analysis of characteristics of delayed visiting in the students' patients with tuberculosis in Mianyang City from 2014 to 2018[J]. J Tuberc Lung Health, 2019, 6(8): 90-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBJK201902005.htm
[9]	郭培军, 周正全, 王淑蕾, 等. 2011—2015年烟台市学生肺结核就诊延误影响因素分析[J]. 中国病原微生物学杂志, 2016, 11(12): 1074-1078. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZISC201612005.htm GUO P J, ZHOU Z Q, WANG S L, et al. Factors influencing the delay of diagnosis and treatment among students with pulmonary tuberculosis in the City of Yantai from 2011 to 2015[J]. J Parasit Biol, 2016, 11(12): 1074-1078. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZISC201612005.htm
[10]	陈彬, 王晓萌, 顾华, 等. 浙江省学生肺结核患者发现延误影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2013, 34(11): 1339-1341. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201311023.htm CHEN B, WANG X M, GU H, et al. Influencing factors of case-finding delay among student pulmonary TB patients in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2013, 34(11): 1339-1341. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201311023.htm
[11]	王晓君, 付谦, 张正斌, 等. 武汉市2008—2017年结核病患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 643-647. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.06.008 WANG X J, FU Q, ZHANG Z B, et al. Delay on care-seeking and related influencing factors among tuberculosis patients in Wuhan, 2008-2017[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2019, 40(6): 643-647. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.06.008
[12]	沈鸿程, 杜雨华, 张广川, 等. 2008—2018年广州市结核病患者就诊延迟影响因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2020, 42(5): 510-517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.05.017 SHEN H C, DU Y H, ZHANG G C, et al. Influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patient delay in Guangzhou, 2008-2018[J]. Chin J Antituberc, 2020, 42(5): 510-517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.05.017
[13]	魏建军, 曾令霞. 2014—2017年陕西汉中市肺结核患者就诊延迟及影响因素[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2018, 29(5): 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBYF201805016.htm WEI J J, ZENG L X. Status and associated factors ananlysis of health seeking delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Hanzhong City(2014-2017)[J]. J Public Prev Med, 2018, 29(5): 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBYF201805016.htm
[14]	李源, 高风华, 边文建, 等. 2010—2019年淄博市学生肺结核患者发现延误情况分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2019, 48(6): 1115-1118. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202106037.htm LI Y, GAO F H, BIAN W J, et al. Analysis on the delay and influence factors of tuberculosis detection among students in Zibo from 2010 to 2019[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2019, 48(6): 1115-1118. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202106037.htm
[15]	李德洋, 苏德奇, 张为胜, 等. 乌鲁木齐市肺结核患者就诊, 确诊, 发现延迟的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1152-1154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX202011017.htm LI D Y, SU D Q, ZHANG W S, et al. Factors influencing the delay in diagnosis, diagnosis and discovery of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Urumqi[J]. Prev Med, 2020, 32(11): 1152-1154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX202011017.htm
[16]	TONG Y, GUAN X, HOU S, et al. Determinants of health care-seeking delay among tuberculosis patients in rural area of central China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(9): 1998-2001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091998
[17]	张胜男, 徐洁, 叶海明, 等. 深圳市福田区"四位一体, 三师共管"学校结核病管理模式构建与实践研究[J]. 实用预防医学, 2019, 26(12): 132-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYY201912037.htm ZHANG S N, XU J, YE H M, et al. Study on the construction and practice of the tuberculosis management model in the school of "four in one, three divisionsco-management" in Futian District, Shenzhen[J]. Pract Prev Med, 2019, 26(12): 132-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYY201912037.htm
[18]	张正斌, 王桂阳, 王晓君, 等. 武汉市2011—2018年学生结核病患者就诊延迟及影响因素[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41(9): 1368-1371. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.09.024 ZHANG Z B, WANG G Y, WANG X J, et al. Delay in treatment and influencing factors of student tuberculosis patients in Wuhan from 2011 to 2018[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2020, 41(9): 1368-1371. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.09.024
[19]	李文辉, 冯汉阳, 钟明浩, 等. 东莞市青少年2009—2018年结核病患者就诊延迟及影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(2): 264-268, 272. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.02.026 LI W H, FENG H Y, ZHONG M H, et al. Delay on care-seeking and influencing factors among adolescent tuberculosis patients in Dongguan City from 2009 to 2018[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2021, 42(2): 264-268, 272. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.02.026