The relationship between anti-epidemic mentality and post-traumatic stress disorder in medical college students during the COVID-19 pandemic
-
摘要:
目的 探讨新冠肺炎疫情期间医学院校大学生抗疫心态与创伤后应激障碍的关系,为预防大学生再次经历突发危机事件时可能出现创伤后应激障碍提供科学依据。 方法 采用创伤后应激障碍自评量表(PCL-C)与公众抗疫心态自检自助表,对山西医科大学9 399名在校本科生进行线上问卷调查。 结果 新冠肺炎疫情期间大学生PCL-C总分(22.74±7.78)分,PTSD症状阳性率为5.3%,创伤再体验症状、回避麻木症状、警觉性增高症状检出率分别为27.0%,16.6%,8.6%,3个症状群中回避麻木症状均分最高,为(9.21±3.39)分,得分最高的2个条目为反复回忆创伤性事件(1.57±0.71)分、难以集中注意力(1.47±0.71)分。女生警觉性增高维度得分(6.82±2.61)高于男生(6.67±2.72)(t=-6.49,P < 0.05);农村地区学生PCL-C总分及各维度得分均高于城市地区,非医学生高于医学生,非独生子女高于独生子女(P值均 < 0.05)。抗疫心态和创伤后应激障碍自评量表的总分呈正相关(r=0.51,P < 0.01)。多元线性回归分析 < 结果显示,生源地、专业、抗疫心态是大学生PTSD症状的相关因素(P值均 < 0.01)。 结论 抗疫心态是大学生出现PTSD症状的重要相关因素。 Abstract:Objective To explore the relationship between an anti-epidemic mentality and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among college students during the corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic, and to provide a scientific basis for the prevention of PTSD when college students experience sudden crisis events in the future. Methods An online questionnaire survey was conducted among 9 399 undergraduates from Shanxi Medical University using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) and the public anti-epidemic psychology self-examination scale. Results During the COVID-19 pandemic, the total PCL-C scores of college students were (22.74±7.78), and the positive rate of PTSD symptoms was 5.3%. The detection rates of symptom recurrence, avoidance/numbness symptoms and increased alertness symptoms were 27.0%, 16.6% and 8.6%, respectively. The average score of avoidance/numbness symptoms in the three symptom groups was (9.21±3.39), the two items with the highest scores were repeated recall of traumatic events (1.57±0.71) and impaired concentration (1.47±0.71). Females scored higher than males on the increased alertness dimension(6.82±2.61, 6.67±2.72) (t=-6.49, P < 0.05). In respect to PCL-C total scores and the scores of each dimension, rural areas were associated with higher scores than urban areas, and non-medical students scored higher than medical students, while the scores of those who grew up with siblings were higher than only-children (P < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between an anti-epidemic mentality and total PTSD scores (r=0.51, P < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis showed that the place of origin, choice of college major, and anti-epidemic mentality were predictors of PTSD symptoms (P < 0.01). Conclusion Anti-epidemic mentality is associated with the occurrence of PTSD among college students. -
Key words:
- Coronavirus /
- Attitude /
- Stress disorders, post-traumatic /
- Mental health /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
-
表 1 不同人口学特征大学生PTSD得分比较(x±s)
Table 1. Comarison of college student PTSD scores for different demographic indicators(x±s)
人口学指标 选项 人数 统计值 PCL-C总分 创伤再体验 回避麻木 警觉性增高 性别 男 2 725 22.68±8.29 6.75±2.60 9.27±3.65 6.67±2.72 女 6 674 22.76±7.56 6.75±2.39 9.19±3.27 6.82±2.61 t值 -0.18 0.01 1.16 -6.49 P值 0.67 0.92 0.28 0.01 生源地 农村 5 570 23.19±7.97 6.88±2.51 9.40±3.47 6.91±2.71 城市 3 829 22.07±7.44 6.57±2.35 8.93±3.22 6.57±2.53 t值 47.48 37.64 43.81 37.54 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 专业 医学 7 350 22.60±7.76 6.70±2.44 9.16±3.39 6.74±2.63 非医学 2 049 23.24±7.82 6.95±2.47 9.38±3.34 6.91±2.66 t值 -11.09 -16.78 -6.66 -7.33 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 是否独生子女 是 2 482 22.21±7.77 6.57±2.43 8.98±3.34 6.65±2.65 否 6 917 22.93±7.77 6.82±2.45 9.29±3.39 6.82±2.64 t值 -15.59 -18.11 -15.37 -7.10 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 2 大学生PTSD影响因素多元线性回归分析(n=9 399)
Table 2. Multivariate regression analysis of influencing factors of PTSD among college students(n=9 399)
因变量 自变量 β值 标准误 β'值 t值 P值 R2值 △R2值 F值 创伤再体验 生源地 -0.16 0.05 -0.03 -3.01 < 0.01 0.18 0.18 525.08** 专业 0.15 0.06 0.02 2.63 < 0.01 抗疫心态得分 0.19 0.01 0.42 45.09 < 0.01 回避麻木 生源地 -0.27 0.07 -0.04 -3.83 <0.01 0.21 0.21 624.11** 抗疫心态得分 0.28 0.01 0.45 49.32 <0.01 警觉性增高 生源地 -0.19 0.05 -0.04 -3.71 <0.01 0.27 0.27 848.21** 抗疫心态得分 0.25 0.01 0.51 57.74 <0.01 注:**P < 0.01。 -
[1] 刘正奎, 吴坎坎, 王力. 我国灾害心理与行为研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(8): 1091-1098. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201108003.htmLIU Z K, WU K K, WANG L. Research on disaster psychology and behavior in my country[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2011, 19(8): 1091-1098. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201108003.htm [2] KÖHLER M, SCHÄFER H, GOEBEL S, et al. The role of disclosure attitudes in the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity and perceived social support among emergency service workers[J]. Psych Res, 2018, 270: 602-610. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.049 [3] American Society of Psychiatry. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2014: 7. [4] 张晓娜, 张丽, 陈长香. 不同化疗周期的肿瘤患者认知及心理应激障碍的状况分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2018, 45(5): 869-873. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201805027.htmZHANG X N, ZHANG L, CHEN C X. Analysis of cognitive and psychological stress disorder in cancer patients with different chemotherapy cycles[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2018, 45(5): 869-873. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201805027.htm [5] LANG A J, LAFFAYE C, SATZ L E, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the PTSD checklist in detecting PTSD in female veterans in primary care[J]. J Trauma Stress, 2003, 16(3): 257-264. doi: 10.1023/A:1023796007788 [6] American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV精神疾病诊断准则手册[M]. 孔繁钟, 孔繁锦, 译. 台湾: 合记图书出版社, 1996: 271-272.American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV manual of diagnostic criteria for mental disorders[M]. KONG F Z, KONG F J, Translate. Taiwan: Heji Book Publishing House, 1996: 271-272. [7] WU K K, CHAN S K, YIU V F. Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for Chinese survivors of road traffic accidents[J]. Hongkong J Psych, 2008, 18(4): 144-151. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/238094433_Psychometric_Properties_and_Confirmatory_Factor_Analysis_of_the_Posttraumatic_Stress_Disorder_Checklist_for_Chinese_Survivors_of_Road_Traffic_Accidents__ [8] 枝江新冠状病毒疫情紧急心理危机干预医疗小组. 快来自测!《公众抗疫心态自检自助表》上线[EB/OL]. [2020-02-16]. http://www.zgzhijiang.gov.cn/content-93-569697-1.html.Zhijiang New Coronavirus Epidemic Emergency Psychological Crisis Intervention Medical Team. Come to self-test! Public anti epidemic mentality self check self help form online[EB/OL]. [2020-02-16]. http://www.zgzhijiang.gov.cn/content-93-569697-1.html. [9] 李越峰, 李东辉, 吴红伟, 等. 突发疫情所致创伤后应激障碍相关信号通路研究进展[J]. 中药材, 2020, 43(11): 2826-2830.LI Y F, LI D H, WU H W, et al. Research Progress on signaling pathways related to post traumatic stress disorder caused by outbreak[J]. Chin Herbal Med, 2020, 43(11): 2826-2830. [10] TANG W, HU T, HU B, et al. Prevalence and correlates of PTSD and depressive symptoms one month after the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in a sample of home-quarantined Chinese university students[J]. J Affect Dis, 2020, 274: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.009 [11] 吕遥迪, 吴恺君, 张雨青. 中国创伤后应激反应量表在大学生群体中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1324-1330. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201508003.htmLYU Y D, WU K J, ZHANG Y Q. Application of China post traumatic stress response scale in college students[J]. Prog Psychol Sci, 2015, 23(8): 1324-1330. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201508003.htm [12] 何树德. 地震情景再现对灾区大学生创伤后应激障碍及其共病的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2011, 32(8): 941-942, 945. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201108020.htmHE S D. The impact of earthquake scene reconstruction on post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbidities of college students in disaster areas[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2011, 32(8): 941-942, 945. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIWS201108020.htm [13] 路保慧, 汪丛敏, 陈会然, 等. 创伤后应激障碍流行病学调查地区差异的比较[J]. 精神医学杂志, 2009, 22(5): 373-374. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7201.2009.05.019LU B H, WANG C M, CHEN H R, et al. Comparison of regional differences in epidemiological investigation of post-traumatic stress disorder[J]. J Psych, 2009, 22(5): 373-374. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7201.2009.05.019 [14] 唐龙, 景璐石, 贺伟, 等. 5·12地震后一般灾区大学生创伤后应激障碍症状调查[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2011, 19(6): 730-732. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201106045.htmTANG L, JING L S, HE W, et al. 5·12 investigation of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms of college students in general disaster areas after the earthquake[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2011, 19(6): 730-732. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201106045.htm [15] JIN Y, ZENG P, AN J, et al. Negative life events and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: a moderated mediation model of only-child status and depressive symptoms[J]. Public Health, 2019, 172: 31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.04.005 [16] 董人齐, 周霞, 焦小楠, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间隔离人员心理状况调查研究[J]. 康复学报, 2020, 30(1): 7-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FYXB202001004.htmDONG R Q, ZHOU X, JIAO X N, et al. Investigation on the psychological status of quarantined persons during the novel coronavirus pneumonia epidemic[J]. Rehabil Med, 2020, 30(1): 7-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FYXB202001004.htm [17] 田雅军, 张亚利, 钱忠立. 新型冠状病毒感染防控期间杭州市某农村实施封闭措施后村民情绪状况调查[J]. 健康研究, 2020, 40(1): 16-18, 21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZYG202001005.htmTIAN Y J, ZHANG Y L, QIAN Z L. Investigation on the emotional state of villagers after the implementation of closed measures in a rural area of Hangzhou during the prevention and control of new coronavirus infection[J]. Health Res, 2020, 40(1): 16-18, 21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZYG202001005.htm [18] 李殿江, 王琴, 尉力文, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间大学生心理健康及应对方式调查研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48(8): 1430-1434. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202108021.htmLI D J, WANG Q, WEI L W, et al. Investigation on mental health and coping styles of college students during New Coronavirus pneumonia outbreak[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2021, 48(8): 1430-1434. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF202108021.htm [19] 李锐. 创伤后应激障碍与心理健康及应对方式的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2014, 22(4): 501-503. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201404010.htmLI R. The relationship between post-traumatic stress disorder and mental health and coping styles[J]. Chin J Health Psychol, 2014, 22(4): 501-503. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201404010.htm -

计量
- 文章访问数: 650
- HTML全文浏览量: 262
- PDF下载量: 48
- 被引次数: 0