Current status and associated factors of fatigue among junior high and senior high school students in Suzhou City
-
摘要:
目的 了解苏州市青少年疲劳现状并分析影响因素,为采取应对措施改善青少年疲劳状况提供参考。 方法 采用分层整群随机抽样方法,在苏州市4市6区共20所学校抽取16 109名初、高中学生进行一般资料调查及疲劳量表(FS-14)调查。 结果 青少年躯体疲劳、脑力疲劳得分及疲劳总分分别为(3.90±2.24)(2.26±1.71)(6.16±3.56)分。多元线性回归分析显示,性别、学段、自评学习成绩、学习时间、锻炼次数、锻炼时间、是否单亲、居住环境、家中是否有人常说疲劳,以及是否可以从身边人处得到支持均对青少年疲劳得分有影响(B值分别为0.35,1.16,-0.50,0.50,-0.26,-0.27,0.32,0.31,1.19,-0.49,P值均<0.01)。 结论 苏州市青少年疲劳得分相对较高。应针对青少年的疲劳问题制定相应的预防措施,减少疲劳症状对青少年身心健康造成的影响。 Abstract:Objective The purpose of this study is to investigate the current status and associated factors of fatigue among adolescents in Suzhou and to provide reference for improving adolescent fatigue. Methods A general information questionnaire and the Fatigue Scale-14 (FS-14) were administered among 16 109 junior high and senior high school students from 20 schools in six districts of four cities in Suzhou, using stratified cluster random sampling. Results The physical fatigue score, mental fatigue score and total fatigue score of the participants were (3.90±2.24) (2.26±1.71) and (6.16±3.56) points, respectively. Gender, grade, academic performance, study time, exercise frequency, exercise duration, whether from a single parent family, living environment, family members frequently reported fatigue, and social support from around showed associations with adolescent fatigue score by the multiple linear regression analysis(B=0.35, 1.16, -0.50, 0.50, -0.26, -0.27, 0.32, 0.31, 1.19, -0.49, P<0.01). Conclusion The fatigue scores of adolescents in Suzhou are relatively high. Special preventive measures should be formulated to reduce the impact of fatigue symptoms on adolescents. -
Key words:
- Fatigue /
- Regression analysis /
- Adolescent /
- Questionnaires
-
表 1 不同人口学特征青少年疲劳量表得分比较(x±s)
Table 1. Comparison of physical fatigue, mental fatigue and total fatigue score of adolescents with different characteristics(x±s)
人口学指标 选项 人数 统计值 躯体疲劳 脑力疲劳 总分 性别 男 7 743 3.62±2.26 2.20±1.67 5.82±3.55 女 8 366 4.16±2.19 2.32±1.74 6.48±3.54 t值 -15.58 -4.26 -11.83 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 学段 初中生 7 629 3.31±2.08 1.97±1.59 5.28±3.29 高中生 8 480 4.43±2.25 2.53±1.77 6.95±3.61 t值 -32.54 -20.92 -30.60 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 自评学习成绩 非常好 1 469 3.31±2.25 2.01±1.71 5.31±3.64 好 3 411 3.31±2.17 1.76±1.62 5.07±3.40 一般 9 123 3.82±2.20 2.16±1.68 5.98±3.49 不太好 1 782 4.23±2.24 2.58±1.71 6.81±3.54 不好 324 4.47±2.29 2.80±1.73 7.28±3.63 F值 84.10 117.19 120.21 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 每日学习时间/h < 6 463 3.24±2.06 2.06±1.63 5.30±3.29 6~ 1 405 3.08±2.04 2.02±1.59 5.10±3.24 8~ 3 719 3.28±2.08 1.94±1.59 5.22±3.26 10~ 4 564 3.80±2.19 2.18±1.67 5.98±3.47 ≥12 5 958 4.60±2.23 2.26±1.71 7.20±3.62 F值 297.61 104.43 247.32 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 锻炼次数/周 ≥6 2 372 3.48±2.21 2.12±1.65 5.59±3.47 3~5 5 108 3.59±2.17 2.06±1.65 5.65±3.43 1~2 5 413 3.99±2.21 2.28±1.72 6.27±3.53 < 1 1 477 4.59±2.27 2.67±1.80 7.26±3.68 0 1 739 4.53±2.24 2.63±1.75 7.16±3.59 F值 121.94 63.62 115.61 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 每次锻炼时间/min ≥30 8 110 3.61±2.21 2.10±1.67 5.71±3.49 < 30 7 999 4.18±2.24 2.42±1.73 6.61±3.57 t值 -16.33 -12.23 -16.17 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 是否单亲 否 15 409 3.89±2.24 2.25±1.71 6.14±3.57 是 700 4.08±2.17 2.43±1.66 6.51±3.41 t值 -2.22 -2.65 -2.67 P值 0.03 0.01 0.01 居住环境 很安静 495 3.46±2.21 1.94±1.63 5.40±3.47 比较安静 2 223 3.68±2.20 2.06±1.66 5.74±3.46 不太嘈杂 4 123 4.14±2.23 2.44±1.72 6.58±3.55 比较嘈杂 7 735 4.43±2.24 2.70±1.76 7.13±3.60 很嘈杂 1 533 4.30±2.24 2.93±1.76 7.22±3.64 F值 82.62 109.80 114.76 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 家中是否有人常说疲劳 没有 9 967 3.35±2.14 1.93±1.61 5.28±3.35 有 6 142 4.24±2.23 2.47±1.74 6.71±3.57 t值 -24.94 -19.71 -25.24 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 能从身边人处得到支持 完全能 538 3.20±2.15 1.74±1.57 4.94±3.32 多数能 1 941 3.72±2.20 2.05±1.66 5.77±3.46 有时候能 5 146 4.17±2.22 2.48±1.71 6.64±3.54 很少能 6 666 4.40±2.26 2.77±1.75 7.17±3.59 根本不能 1 818 4.14±2.33 2.75±1.77 6.89±3.73 F值 101.94 147.10 147.19 P值 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 2 青少年疲劳总分影响因素的多元线性回归分析(n=16 109)
Table 2. Multiple linear regression of factors influencing the total fatigue score in adolescents(n=16 109)
常数与自变量 B值 标准误 β值 t值 P值 常数项 3.52 0.23 - 15.11 < 0.01 性别 0.35 0.05 0.05 6.72 < 0.01 学段 1.16 0.05 0.16 21.75 < 0.01 自评学习成绩 -0.50 0.03 -0.12 -16.10 < 0.01 学习时间 0.50 0.03 0.15 20.21 < 0.01 锻炼次数 -0.26 0.02 -0.09 -11.36 < 0.01 锻炼时间 -0.27 0.05 -0.04 -5.07 < 0.01 是否单亲 0.32 0.13 0.02 2.55 0.01 居住环境 0.31 0.03 0.08 11.41 < 0.01 家中是否有人常说疲劳 1.19 0.05 0.16 22.68 < 0.01 能从身边人处得到支持 -0.49 0.03 -1.31 -17.82 < 0.01 -
[1] 李峰, 韩晨霞, 吴凤芝, 等. 疲劳的现代研究[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2016, 46(8): 903. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCXK201608002.htmLI F, HAN C X, WU F Z, et al. Modern research on fatigue[J]. Sci Sinica(Vitae), 2016, 46(8): 903. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCXK201608002.htm [2] ASPRUSTEN T T, SLETNER L, WYLLER V. Are there subgroups of chronic fatigue syndrome?An exploratory cluster analysis of biological markers[J]. J Transl Med, 2021, 19(1): 48. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02713-9 [3] BAKKEN I J, TVEITO K, GUNNES N, et al. Two age peaks in the incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a population-based registry study from Norway 2008-2012[J]. BMC Med, 2014, 12(1): 167. http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4189623/?report=classic [4] CHALDER T, BERELOWITZ G, PAWLIKOWSKA T, et al. Development of a Fatigue Scale[J]. J Psychosom Res, 1993, 37(2): 147-153. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-P [5] 张作记. 行为医学量表手册[M]. 北京: 中华医学电子音像出版社, 2005.ZHANG Z J. Handbook of Behavioral Medicine Scale[M]. Beijing: China Medical Electronic Audiovisual Publishing House, 2005. [6] 王天芳, 薛晓琳. 疲劳自评量表[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2009, 24(3): 348-349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY200903028.htmWANG T F, XUE X L. Fatigue self-rating scale[J]. Chin J Tradit Chin Med Pharm, 2009, 24(3): 348-349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY200903028.htm [7] 王天芳, 薛晓琳. 疲劳自评量表的理论构建及其研制[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2007, 30(4): 221-223. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-2157.2007.04.001WANG T F, XUE X L. Theoretical construction and development of fatigue self-rating scale[J]. J Beijing Univ Tradit Chin Med, 2007, 30(4): 221-223. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-2157.2007.04.001 [8] 薛晓琳, 王天芳, 于春光, 等. 疲劳自评量表的信, 效度评价[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2008, 28(6): 550. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-5370.2008.06.019XUE X L, WANG T F, YU C G, et al. Reliability and validity evaluation of fatigue self-rating scale[J]. Chin J Integrat Tradit Western Med, 2008, 28(6): 550. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-5370.2008.06.019 [9] JING M J, LIN W Q, WANG Q, et al. Reliability and construct validity of two versions of Chalder Fatigue Scale among the general population in Mainland China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2016, 13(1): 147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010147 [10] WONG W S, FIELDING R. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale in a Chinese community sample[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2010, 68(1): 89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.008 [11] SHI J Y, SHEN J, XIE J, et al. Chronic fatigue syndrome in Chinese middle-school students[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(4): e9716. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009716 [12] 孙彩虹, 夏薇, 张昭, 等. 哈尔滨市中学生慢性疲劳综合征现况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2009, 30(11): 968-970. http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201406043SUN C H, XIA W, ZHANG Z, et al. Analysis of the current situation and influencing factors of chronic fatigue syndrome among middle school students in Harbin[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2009, 30(11): 968-970. http://www.cjsh.org.cn/article/id/zgxxws201406043 [13] 王天芳, 张翠珍, 刘雁峰. 慢性疲劳综合征病人的疲劳、抑郁、焦虑与生活事件的特点及其相关性分析[J]. 中国行为医学科学, 2000, 9(2): 84-86. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2000.02.002WANG T F, ZHANG C Z, LIU Y F, et al. Characteristics and correlation analysis of fatigue, depression, anxiety and life events in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Chin J Behav Med Sci, 2000, 9(2): 84-86. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2000.02.002 [14] 庞静, 李英华, 陶茂萱. 亚健康与慢性疲劳综合征的人群分布特征及危险因素研究进展[J]. 中国健康教育, 2010, 26(4): 303-305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK201004020.htmPANG J, LI Y H, TAO M X. Research progress on population distribution characteristics and risk factors of sub-health and chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2010, 26(4): 303-305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK201004020.htm [15] 申志梅. 中学生慢性疲劳的成因及其对"体测"成绩的影响[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2017.SHEN Z M. The causes of chronic fatigue of middle school students and its influence on the performance of "physical test"[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2017. [16] 申国勇, 闵瑞欣, 王子楠, 等. 临潼区中学生慢性疲劳综合症分布及其运动后尿常规检测分析[J]. 辽宁体育科技, 2017, 39(2): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6204.2017.02.012SHEN G Y, MIN R X, WANG Z N, et al. The distribution of chronic fatigue syndrome and analysis of urine routine test after exercise of middle school students in Lintong district[J]. Liaoning Sport Sci Technol, 2017, 39(2): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6204.2017.02.012 [17] ISAK E, JOHAN S, GÖRAN W, et al. Fatigue in the general population-associations to age, sex, socioeconomic status, physical activity, sitting time and self-rated health: the northern Sweden MONICA study 2014[J]. BMC Public Health, 2017, 17(1): 654. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4623-y [18] 张云婷, 马生霞, 陈畅, 等. 中国儿童青少年身体活动指南[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2017, 12(6): 401-409. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2017.06.001ZHANG Y T, MA S X, CHEN C, et al. A guide to physical activity for children and adolescents in China[J]. Chin J Pediar, 2017, 12(6): 401-409. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2017.06.001 [19] 郭强. 中国儿童青少年身体活动水平及其影响因素的研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2016.GUO Q. A study on the physical activity level and influencing factors of Chinese children[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2016. [20] GUTHOLD R, STEVENS G A, RILEY L M, et al. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants[J]. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2020, 4(1): 23-35. [21] GODFREY E, CLEARE A, CODDINGTON A, et al. Chronic fatigue syndrome in adolescents: do parental expectations of their child's intellectual ability match the child's ability?[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2009, 67(2): 165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.02.004 [22] CRAWLEY E, HUGHES R, NORTHSTONE K, et al. Chronic disabling fatigue at age 13 and association with family adversity[J]. Pediatrics, 2012, 130(1): e71-e79. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22711716 [23] RANGEL L, GARRALDA M E, JEFFS J, et al. Family health and characteristics in chronic fatigue syndrome, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, and emotional disorders of childhood[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2005, 44(2): 150-158. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200502000-00007 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 805
- HTML全文浏览量: 340
- PDF下载量: 66
- 被引次数: 0