Effect of group cognitive therapy on negative emotion and impulsivity of college students with Internet addiction
-
摘要:
目的 采取团体认知治疗方法，比较干预组和对照组网络成瘾大学生在负性情绪以及冲动性方面的差异变化，探索团体治疗网络成瘾的效果。 方法 将招募的贵阳某高校33名网络成瘾大学生随机分为干预组(16名)和对照组(17名)，在干预前后进行网络成瘾量表、抑郁自评量表、焦虑自评量表、UPPSP冲动行为量表的测量。采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术，检测两组被试在干预前后与冲动抑制功能相关的脑电成分差异。 结果 对照组干预前后两次网络成瘾、焦虑、抑郁及冲动性的得分变化均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)；对照组后测N1波幅高于前测(t值分别为-3.32，-3.19，P值均<0.05)，N2、P3的波幅变化均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。干预组干预前后的抑郁、焦虑得分下降(t值分别为2.20，2.45，P值均<0.05)；消极紧迫感及积极紧迫感得分下降(t值分别为3.84，3.44，P值均<0.05)；干预组干预后，N1波幅的反应任务(GO)和停止任务(STOP)均高于前测(t值分别为-3.08，-2.72，P值均<0.05)，N2、P3的STOP均低于前测(t值分别为2.10，2.07，P值均<0.05)。 结论 团体认知治疗可以改善网络成瘾大学生的负性情绪，降低冲动性水平，并在一定程度上改善其冲动控制功能。 Abstract:Objective To explore the effects of group cognitive therapy on negative emotions and impulsivity among college students with Internet addiction. Methods 33 college students with Internet addiction from one university in Guiyang were randomly divided into intervention group (n=16) and control group (n=17). Before and after the intervention, the Young's Internet Addiction Test, Self-rating Depression Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale and UPPSP Impulsive Behavior Scale were administered. In addition, the event-related potential (ERP) technology was used to detect the differences in EEG components related to impulse suppression between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results There were no statistically significant changes in the scores of Internet addiction, anxiety, depression, and impulsivity in the control group before and after(P>0.05); the N1 amplitude in the control group was higher than that in the previous test(t=-3.32, -3.19, P<0.05), and the changes in the amplitude of N2 and P3 were not statistically significant(P>0.05). The depression and anxiety scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the pre-test (t=2.20, 2.45, P<0.05); the negative urgency and positive urgency scores were significantly lower than those of pre-test (t=3.84, 3.44, P<0.05); the N1 amplitude of the intervention group after treatment was higher than the previous test (t=-3.08, -2.72, P<0.05), and the N2 and P3 were lower than the previous test (t=2.10, 2.07, P<0.05). Conclusion Group cognitive therapy can improve the negative emotions of college students with Internet addiction, reduce the impulsivity level of college students with Internet addiction, and improve the impulse control function of college students with Internet addiction to a certain extent. -
Key words:
- Group processes /
- Internet /
- Behavior, addictive /
- Emotions /
- Intervention studies /
- Students
-
表 1 网络成瘾大学生团体认知治疗方案
Table 1. Group cognitive therapy program for Internet addiction college students
名称 目标 活动内容 缘聚你我 相识，建立团体契约 1.信任之旅；2.你知我知；3.连环自我介绍；4.讨论团体契约；5.家庭作业 风雨同舟 加深认识，促进团体相互信任 1.天气预报；2.同舟共济；3.海上泛舟；4.我们的理想；5.家庭作业 披荆斩棘 制定成员个体目标，分享以往小点滴 1.天气预报；2.我是不一样的烟火；3.勇往直前；4.家庭作业 情绪知多少 识别自身的情绪，改善不良情绪应对方式，发掘动机和兴趣 1.天气预报；2.你的情绪，我知道；3.如果远离一个月；4.说出心声；5.家庭作业 那些花儿 评估成员人际关系，应对问题社会支持系统，提高问题正向解决能力 1.天气预报；2.那些花儿；3.带高帽；4.家庭作业 生活是个大馅饼 提高时间管理能力，合理分配时间 1.天气预报；2.生活馅饼；3.留作业结束 突破困境 引导成员评估和思考意志力，协助成员制定规划，激发渐进动力 1.天气预报；2.意志力评估；3.突破重围；4.生活拼图 共同的约定 回顾以往活动，讨论心路历程，处理离别情绪 1.天气报告；2.分享变化；3.离别祝福；4.合唱“相亲相爱一家人” 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同组别网络成瘾大学生干预前后情绪量表及网络成瘾得分比较(x±s)
Table 2. Comparison of Emotion Scale and Internet addiction scores of college students with Internet addiction before and after intervention in different groups (x±s)
组别 干预前后 人数 统计值 SDS SAS IAT 对照组 干预前 17 48.53±5.87 45.59±5.96 65.29±10.37 干预后 17 50.29±6.95 45.81±7.98 63.71±10.01 t值 -0.80 -0.09 0.46 P值 0.43 0.93 0.65 干预组 干预前 16 50.00±12.32 48.28±11.35 63.81±9.61 干预后 16 41.25±10.10 39.38±9.09 52.06±4.46 t值 2.20 2.45 4.44 P值 0.04 0.02 < 0.01
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同组别网络成瘾大学生干预前后UUPS冲动行为量表各维度得分比较(x±s)
Table 3. Comparison of different dimensions of the UUPS Impulsive Behavior Scale before and after intervention in different groups of Internet addiction college students (x±s)
组别 干预前后 人数 统计值 消极紧迫感 缺乏计划性 缺乏耐性 感觉寻求 积极紧迫感 干预组 干预前 16 32.13±3.50 23.31±3.40 22.38±3.36 31.13±5.57 35.75±4.73 干预后 16 26.38±4.86 22.63±2.25 21.44±3.12 30.44±5.09 29.94±4.82 t值 3.84 0.68 0.82 0.37 3.44 P值 < 0.01 0.51 0.42 0.72 < 0.01 对照组 干预前 17 32.00±5.33 24.47±5.85 25.18±5.04 28.24±5.92 35.06±4.67 干预后 17 31.88±5.07 24.41±4.23 23.88±3.72 29.41±7.35 34.59±6.21 t值 0.07 0.03 0.85 -0.51 0.25 P值 0.95 0.97 0.40 0.61 0.80
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同组别网络成瘾大学生干预前后脑电波幅比较(x±s，μv)
Table 4. Comparison of EEG before and after intervention in different groups of Internet addiction college students (x±s, μv)
组别 干预前后 人数 统计值 N1 N2 P3 GO STOP GO STOP GO STOP 对照组 干预前 17 -0.28±2.31 -0.48±2.27 0.20±1.77 0.21±1.68 -0.02±1.57 -0.27±1.53 干预后 17 2.66±2.73 2.35±2.60 -0.13±2.16 -0.04±2.23 -1.08±1.54 -0.56±1.73 t值 -3.32 -3.19 0.45 0.37 1.87 0.50 P值 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.72 0.07 0.62 干预组 干预前 16 -0.72±2.30 -0.60±2.16 0.30±2.09 0.40±1.86 -0.40±1.63 -0.10±1.67 干预后 16 1.92±2.42 1.68±2.51 -0.20±1.42 -0.96±1.42 -0.82±1.42 -1.27±1.30 t值 -3.08 -2.72 0.73 2.10 0.77 2.07 P值 0.00 0.01 0.47 0.04 0.45 0.05
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] YOUNG K S. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder[J]. Cyberpsychol Behav, 1998, 1(3): 237-244. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 [2] 郭玉宾. 大学生网络成瘾及其干预策略[J]. 河南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 8(3): 342-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9779.2007.03.024GUO Y B. College students' internet addiction and intervention strategies[J]. J Henan Polytech Univ (Soc Sci), 2007, 8(3): 342-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9779.2007.03.024 [3] 孔明, 傅文青, 刘伟, 等. 团体心理辅导对大学生网络成瘾的影响研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(1): 137-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201101044.htmKONG M, FU W Q, LIU W, et al. Effect of group guidance on internet addiction disorder among university students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2011, 19(1): 137-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201101044.htm [4] 陈素真, 吴素英. 团体认知行为治疗对青少年网络成瘾患者的效果分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2018, 16(15): 172-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY201815076.htmCHEN S Z, WU S Y. Analysis of the effect of group cognitive behavior therapy on adolescents with internet addiction[J]. Chin Med Res, 2018, 16(15): 172-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY201815076.htm [5] 李玲, 黄艳苹. 认知行为团体辅导对网瘾贫困大学生的干预研究[J]. 现代教育科学, 2017(4): 117-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLJK201704022.htmLI L, HUANG Y P. Cognitive behavior group counseling intervention research on poor college students with internet addiction[J]. Mod Educ Sci, 2017(4): 117-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLJK201704022.htm [6] 赵松涛, 杨永信, 魏秋香, 等. 团体认知行为治疗青少年网络成瘾综合征的疗效[J]. 武警医学, 2016, 27(4): 392-395. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJYX201604021.htmZHAO S T, YANG Y X, WEI Q X, et al. Control study of curative effect on internet addiction disorder elimination by cognitive behavioral therapy in groups[J]. Med J Chin People's Armed Police Forces, 2016, 27(4): 392-395. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJYX201604021.htm [7] 张将星, 王佩佩. 大学生网络成瘾典型心理治疗法的实证比较[J]. 心理学探新, 2015, 35(6): 557-560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2015.06.014ZHANG J X, WANG P P. An empirical comparison of three typical psyehotherapies in college students' Internet addiction[J]. Psychol Explor, 2015, 35(6): 557-560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2015.06.014 [8] 孙岩, 王晓丹, 刘沙, 等. 网络成瘾者工作记忆水平受影响的机制: 来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2017, 40(5): 1208-1214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201705028.htmSUN Y, WANG X D, LIU S, et al. The brain mechanism on working memory level of internet addicts: from the evidence of ERP[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2017, 40(5): 1208-1214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201705028.htm [9] 侯娟, 侯莹莹, 陈双艺, 等. 网络成瘾者工作记忆能力的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 384-393. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.03.015HOU J, HOU Y Y, CHEN S Y, et al. The working memory ability of internet addicts: An ERP study[J]. Study Psych Behav, 2018, 16(3): 384-393. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.03.015 [10] 葛缨, 陈维, 谢雪云, 等. 青少年网络成瘾的事件相关电位: 基于Meta分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(2): 126-134. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNND201602020.htmGE Y, CHEN W, XIE X Y, et al. ERP study of internet addiction in adolescents-based on meta-analysis[J]. J Southwest Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2016, 38(2): 126-134. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNND201602020.htm [11] 穆俊林, 张瑞岭, 徐建强, 等. 青少年网络成瘾者的探究性眼动及事件相关电位分析[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2010, 36(3): 152-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2010.03.017MU J L, ZHANG R L, XU J Q, et al. Analysis of exploratory eye movements and ERPs of adolescent Internet addicts[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2010, 36(3): 152-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2010.03.017 [12] WIDYSNTO L, MCMURRAN M. The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test[J]. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2004, 7(4): 443-450. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443 [13] LACONI S, RODGERS R F, CHABROL H. The measurement of Internet addiction: a critical review of existing scales and their psychometric properties[J]. Comput Hum Behav, 2014, 41: 190-202. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.026 [14] 曹建琴, 张慧. 网络成瘾测评工具研究进展[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2010, 18(3): 374-376. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201003051.htmCAO J Q, ZHANG H. Advances in the research of internet addiction assessment tools[J]. Chin J Health Psych, 2010, 18(3): 374-376. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201003051.htm [15] 李晓驷, 李泽爱, 谢雯, 等. 合肥市中学生网络成瘾流行病学调查报告[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2006(1): 51-54. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2006.01.015LI X S, LI Z A, XIE W, et al. Epidemiological investigation on internet addiction among middle school students in Hefei[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2006(1): 51-54. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2006.01.015 [16] 舒良. 自评抑郁量表[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1999(增刊): 194-196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LBJY201306004.htmSHU L. Self-rating depression scale[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 1999(Suppl): 194-196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LBJY201306004.htm [17] 田银娣, 王怡恺, 李静, 等. 焦虑和抑郁量表在肝硬化患者临床应用中的信效度评价[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2019, 22(1): 105-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2019.01.028TIAN Y D, WANG Y K, LI J, et al. Evaluation of reliability and validity of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. J Prac Hepatol, 2019, 22(1): 105-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2019.01.028 [18] 吴文源. 焦虑自评量表[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1999(增刊): 235-238. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZXX201804056.htmWU W Y. Self-rating anxiety scale[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 1999(Suppl): 235-238. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZXX201804056.htm [19] SMITH G T, FISCHER S, CYDERS M A, et al. On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits[J]. Assessment, 2007, 14(2): 155. doi: 10.1177/1073191106295527 [20] 吕锐, 张英俊, 钟杰. UPPS冲动行为量表在中国大学生人群中的初步修订[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(3): 480-484, 417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201403023.htmLYU R, ZHANG Y J, ZHONG J. The adaptation of UPPS impulsive behavior scale among Chinese college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2014, 22(3): 480-484, 417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201403023.htm [21] GUIDO P H, MAURITS W, GORDON D L. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure[J]. Acta Psychol(Amst), 2003, 112(2): 105-142. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3 [22] GUAN S S, SUBRAHMANYAM K. Youth Internet use: risks and opportunities[J]. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 2009, 22(4): 351-356. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832bd7e0 [23] CHI X, LIU X, GUO T, et al. Internet addiction and depression in chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model[J]. Pubmed, 2019, 10(10): 819-851. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798471 [24] 马东云, 李妮娜, 郭瑶, 等. 某医学院大学生网络成瘾者的冲动性人格特征及其与认知功能的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2018, 26(1): 103-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201801029.htmMA D Y, LI N N, GUO Y, et al. Relationship between impulsive personality traits and cognitive function in college students with internet addiction disorder[J]. Chin J Health Psych, 2018, 26(1): 103-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JKXL201801029.htm [25] 黄林凯. 高中生依恋与网络成瘾[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2019.HUANG L K. High school students' attachment and and internet addict: the mediating effect of regulatory emotional self-efficacy[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Normal University, 2019. [26] 王长虹, 冀紫阳, 李晏. 网络成瘾的病因及应对策略研究进展[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2018, 35(12): 1139-1142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYX201812025.htmWANG C H, JI Z Y, LI Y. Advances in the study of the causes and coping strategies of Internet addiction[J]. J Xinxiang Med Univ, 2018, 35(12): 1139-1142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYX201812025.htm [27] 徐四华. 网络成瘾者的行为冲动性: 来自爱荷华赌博任务的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1523-1534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201211013.htmXU S H. Internet addicts' behavior impulsivity: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task[J]. Acta Psychol Sin, 2012, 44(11): 1523-1534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201211013.htm [28] 徐远超, 杨裕萍, 吴大兴. 冲动性在负性情绪与大学生网络过度使用间的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(6): 942-945. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201306018.htmXU Y C, YANG Y P, WU DA X. Mediating effect of trait Impulsivity between negative affect and internet overuse in college students[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2013, 21(6): 942-945. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201306018.htm [29] 牛更枫, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 等. 网络成瘾的认知神经科学研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(6): 1104-1111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201306023.htmNIU G F, SUN X J, ZHOU Z K, et al. A review of cognitive neuroscience studies on internet addiction[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2013, 21(6): 1104-1111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201306023.htm [30] 张旭. 住院网络成瘾青少年抑郁与认知情绪调节策略的研究[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2013.ZHANG X. A study of CERQ and depression in hospitalized adolescents of IAD[D]. Dalian: Dalian Medical University, 2013. [31] BRYANT J, ZILLMANN D. Using television to alleviate boredom and stress: Selective exposure as a function of induced excitation states[J]. J Broadcast, 1984, 28(1): 1-20. doi: 10.1080/08838158409386511 [32] 刘勤学, 方晓义, 周楠. 青少年网络成瘾研究现状及未来展望[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(3): 65-70, 160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSB201103016.htmLIU Q X, FANG X Y, ZHOU N. The current situation and future prospect of the research on internet addiction among teenagers[J]. J South China Normal Univ(Soc Sci Ed), 2011(3): 65-70, 160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSB201103016.htm [33] 陈若婷, 兰燕, 严万森. 吸烟和网络成瘾大学生的冲动性特征[J]. 贵州医科大学学报, 2018, 43(12): 1391-1395. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYB201812007.htmCHEN R T, LAN Y, YAN W S. Impulsive characteristics of college students with smoking and internet addiction[J]. J Guizhou Med Univ, 2018, 43(12): 1391-1395. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYB201812007.htm [34] 严万森, 兰燕, 张冉冉. 大学新生冲动性特征与网络成瘾的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2016, 37(12): 1887-1889, 1892. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.12.040YAN W S, LAN Y, ZHANG R R. The relationship between impulsive characteristics of college freshmen and internet addiction[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2016, 37(12): 1887-1889, 1892. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.12.040 [35] 魏鑫, 郭蕾蕾. 医学院校学生网络成瘾现状及与冲动性选择关系[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(3): 380-384. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201603035.htmWEI X, GUO L L. Internet addiction and its relationship with impulsive choice among medical college students[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2016, 32(3): 380-384. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201603035.htm [36] 梅松丽, 张明, 张秀玲, 等. 基于延迟折扣任务的网络成瘾者冲动性研究[J]. 心理科学, 2010, 33(3): 722-725, 735. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201003058.htmMEI S L, ZHANG M, ZHANG X L, et al. Internet addicts' impulsivity based on the delay discounting task[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2010, 33(3): 722-725, 735. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201003058.htm [37] MAZHARI S. Association between problematic Internet use and impulse control disorders among Iranian university students[J]. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2012, 15(5): 270-273. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0548 [38] 梁虹, 王利刚, 樊春雷, 等. 青少年自我控制双系统与网络成瘾的关系研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2016, 19(9): 1076-1080. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.09.019LIANG H, WANG L G, FAN C L, et al. Relationship between the due self-control system and internet addiction among adolescents[J]. Chin Gen Prac, 2016, 19(9): 1076-1080. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.09.019 [39] 张燕贞, 苏萍, 叶苑秀, 等. 大学生网络游戏成瘾的心理社会影响因素: 非适应性认知的中介作用[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(4): 86-91, 191. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSB201704013.htmZHANG Y Z, SU P, YE Y X, et al. Psychosocial factors influencing internet game disorder in university students: the mediating effect of maladaptive cognition[J]. J South China Norm Univer(Soc Sci Ed), 2017(4): 86-91, 191. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSB201704013.htm [40] 崔健, 杨可冰, 杨清艳, 等. 抑郁对大学生网络成瘾的影响: 冲动的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2021, 29(1): 123-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201504013.htmCUI J, YANG K B, YANG Q Y, et al. The influence of depression on internet addiction of college students: the intermediary effect of impulse[J]. China J Health Psych, 2021, 29(1): 123-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201504013.htm [41] 段敬利, 潘伟盟, 穆俊林, 等. 不同程度抑郁症患者认知功能及事件相关电位P300的研究[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2017, 27(5): 327-330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2017.05.014DUAN J L, PAN W M, MU J L, et al. Cognitive function and event related potential P300 among different severity depressive patients[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2017, 27(5): 327-330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2017.05.014 [42] 周振和, 钱永潮, 杨雀屏, 等. 氨磺必利对老年抑郁症患者事件相关电位P300的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36(2): 406-408. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2016.02.072ZHOU Z H, QIAN Y C, YANG Q P, et al. The effect of amisulpride on event-related potential P300 in elderly patients with depression[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2016, 36(2): 406-408. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2016.02.072 [43] 张伯华, 王玥, 杨永信, 等. 基于中医人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERP研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(11): 76-81. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.1068ZHANG B H, WANG Y, YANG Y X, et al. Inhibitory control ability of ERP research on internet addiction disabilities based on personality types of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. J Shandong Univ(Health Sci), 2016, 54(11): 76-81. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.1068 -
点击查看大图
表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 612
- HTML全文浏览量: 401
- PDF下载量: 74
- 被引次数: 0
