Factors influencing the delay of seeking medical treatment among students with tuberculosis in Shaanxi Province from 2015 to 2019
-
摘要:
目的 分析2015—2019年陕西省学生肺结核患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素，为学校防控结核病疫情工作提供科学依据。 方法 通过《中国疾病预防控制信息系统》的子系统《结核病管理信息系统》，收集2015—2019年陕西省登记的6 739例学生肺结核患者信息，采用单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析方法，分析学生肺结核患者就诊延迟特征及影响因素。 结果 6 739例学生肺结核患者中，就诊延迟患者共计3 040名，就诊延迟率高达45.1%，就诊延迟时间中位数为38(24~68)d。2015—2019年学生患者就诊延迟率总体呈下降趋势，不同年份差异有统计学意义(χ2=120.45，P < 0.05)。单因素分析显示，不同患者来源、诊断结果、区域学生的就诊延迟率差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为274.19，26.75，24.12，P值均 < 0.05)，追踪、结核病胸膜炎、陕北地区就诊延迟率更高。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示，区域为陕北(OR=2.74)、关中(OR=2.09)、陕南(OR=2.39)和患者来源为因症就诊(OR=1.84)、因症推荐(OR=2.81)、转诊(OR=3.28)、追踪(OR=6.07)与就诊延迟呈正相关，诊断结果为无病原学结果(OR=0.47)与就诊延迟呈负相关(P值均 < 0.05)。 结论 陕西省2015—2019年学生肺结核患者就诊延迟现象较为普遍，区域、患者来源、诊断结果是学生肺结核患者就诊延误的影响因素，应采取综合措施减少学生就诊延迟。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the delay of seeking medical treatment and associated factors among students with tuberculosis in Shaanxi Province from 2015 to 2019, so as to provide scientific evidence for the early detection and control of tuberculosis epidemics in schools. Methods Data from 6 739 students with pulmonary tuberculosis registered in Shaanxi Province from 2015 to 2019 were collected from the TB Management Information System of China Information System for Disease Control and Prevention. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the characteristics and influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Results Among 6 739 cases of students with pulmonary tuberculosis from 2015 to 2019 in Shaanxi Province, 3 040 patients delayed seeking medical treatment. The rate of delayed treatment was as high as 45.1%, and the median delayed treatment time was 38(24, 68) days. From 2015 to 2019, the overall delay rate of students showed a downward trend, with a significant difference(χ2=120.45, P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in delay rate between different patient sources, diagnosis results and regions(χ2=274.19, 26.75, 24.12, P < 0.05), among which for factors such as tracing, tuberculosis pleurisy, doctor delay in the northern part of Shaanxi, the rates were higher. The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the regions of northern Shaanxi(OR=2.74), central Shaanxi(OR=2.09), and southern Shaanxi(OR=2.39), and clinical consultation(OR=1.84), recommendation(OR=2.81), tracing(OR=3.28), and tracing (OR=6.07) were risk factors for delay of consultation. A lack of etiology results(OR=0.47) was to protect delay of consultation. Conclusion From 2015 to 2019 in Shaanxi Province, a delay in seeking medical treatment was relatively common among students with tuberculosis. The region, source of patients and diagnosis results were factors that influenced the delay in finding tuberculosis patients in Shaanxi Province. -
Key words:
- Tuberculosis, pulmonary /
- Diagnosis /
- Time /
- Regression analysis /
- Students
-
表 1 不同组别就诊延迟学生肺结核患者就诊延迟天数比较[M(P25，P75), d]
Table 1. Comparison of delay days of tuberculosis patients in different groups[M(P25, P75), d]
组别 就诊延迟人数 就诊延迟天数 Z值 P值 性别 男 1 931 38(23，68) -1.05 0.29 女 1 109 38(5，67) 学校类型 幼儿园 2 25.5(20，29) 13.17 0.00 小学 96 45.5(26，77) 中学 1 348 36(23，63) 大学 1 594 39(25，71) 户籍 本地 1 792 35(22，63) -5.69 0.00 流动 1 248 42(27，75) 患者来源 健康检查 50 24.5(17，52) 72.23 0.00 接触者检查 7 28(17，52) 因症就诊 582 31(20，59) 转诊 1 781 28(18，88) 追踪 616 38(25，65) 其他 4 47(30，80) 诊断结果 病原学检查阳性 764 39(24，67) 36.04 0.00 病原学检查阴性 1 895 39(25，70) 结核性胸膜炎 325 30(19，50) 无病原学结果 56 35.5(27，67) 重症 否 3 021 38(24，67) -0.85 0.40 是 19 59(28，92) 治疗分类 初治 3 015 38(24，68) -0.26 0.80 复治 25 40(27，63) 区域 外省 18 41(26，81) 20.39 0.00 陕北 808 39(26，72) 关中 1 616 39(24，69) 陕南 598 32(22，60) 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 陕西省2015—2019年学生肺结核患者就诊延迟影响因素单因素分析
Table 2. Univariate regression analysis of the patients delay of students' tuberculosis and its influencing factors in Shaanxi Province from 2015 to 2019
因素 人数 就诊延迟人数 χ2值 P值 性别 男 4 310 1 931(44.8) 0.46 0.50 女 2 429 1 109(45.7) 学校类型 幼儿园 4 2(50.0) 7.11 0.07 小学 186 96(51.6) 中学 3 088 1 348(43.7) 大学 3 461 1 594(46.1) 户籍 本地 4 000 1 792(44.8) 0.38 0.54 流动 2 739 1 248(45.6) 患者来源 健康检查 229 50(21.8) 274.19 < 0.01 接触者检查 40 7(17.5) 因症就诊 1 698 582(34.3) 转诊 3 773 1 781(47.2) 追踪 984 616(62.6) 其他 15 4(26.7) 诊断结果 病原学检查阳性 1 712 764(44.6) 26.75 < 0.01 病原学检查阴性 4 204 1 895(45.1) 结核性胸膜炎 636 325(51.1) 无病原学结果 187 56(29.9) 重症 否 6 692 3 021(45.1) 0.42 0.52 是 47 19(40.4) 治疗分类 初治 6 676 3 015(45.2) 0.76 0.38 复治 63 25(39.7) 区域 外省 78 18(23.1) 24.12 < 0.01 陕北 1 667 808(48.5) 关中 3 642 1 616(44.4) 陕南 1 352 598(44.2) 注：()内数字为就诊延迟率/%。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 陕西省2015—2019年学生肺结核患者就诊延迟多因素Logistic回归分析(n=6 739)
Table 3. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the patients delay of students' tuberculosis and its influencing factors in Shaanxi Province from 2015 to 2019(n=6 739)
自变量 β值 标准误 Wald χ2值 P值 OR值(OR值95%CI) 性别 男 1.00 女 0.07 0.05 1.93 0.17 1.08(0.97~1.19) 户籍 本地 1.00 流动 -0.05 0.05 1.01 0.32 0.95(0.85~1.05) 区域 外省 1.00 陕北 1.01 0.28 12.78 0.00 2.74(1.58~4.75) 关中 0.74 0.28 7.00 0.01 2.09(1.21~3.60) 陕南 0.87 0.28 9.44 0.00 2.39(1.37~4.15) 学校类型 幼儿园 1.00 小学 -0.25 1.03 0.06 0.81 0.78(0.10~5.86) 中学 -0.48 1.02 0.23 0.64 0.62(0.08~4.54) 大学 -0.39 1.02 0.15 0.70 0.68(0.09~4.99) 患者来源 健康检查 1.00 接触者检查 -0.21 0.45 0.22 0.64 0.81(0.34~1.95) 因症就诊 0.61 0.17 12.76 0.00 1.84(1.32~2.57) 转诊 1.19 0.17 50.70 0.00 3.28(2.37~4.55) 追踪 1.80 0.18 103.74 0.00 6.07(4.29~8.59) 其他 0.53 0.62 0.73 0.39 1.69(0.50~5.68) 诊断结果 病原学检查阳性 1.00 病原学检查阴性 -0.09 0.06 2.15 0.14 0.92(0.81~1.03) 结核性胸膜炎 0.04 0.10 0.16 0.69 1.04(0.86~1.26) 无病原学结果 -0.75 0.18 18.03 0.00 0.47(0.33~0.67) 重症 否 1.00 是 -0.21 0.31 0.44 0.51 0.81(0.44~1.49) 治疗分类 初治 1.00 复治 -0.09 0.27 0.10 0.75 0.92(0.54~1.56)
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 王黎霞, 成诗明, 陈伟, 等. 学校结核病防治工作手册[M]. 北京: 军事医学科学出版社, 2012.WANG L X, CHENG S M, CHEN W, et al. Handbook of tuberculosis control in schools[M]. Beijing: Military Medical Science Press, 2012. [2] 赵筱苹, 张天华. 某职业技术学院结核病聚集性病例的调查与处置[J]. 职业与健康, 2011, 27(24): 2912-2913. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYJK201124046.htmZHAO X P, ZHANG T H. Investigation and treatment for clustered tuberculosis cases in a professional technology college[J]. Occup Health, 2011, 27(24): 2912-2913. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYJK201124046.htm [3] 刘小晖, 刘志敏, 刘言训, 等. 胜利油田地区结核病人就诊延误影响因素研究[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2007, 23(12): 855-856. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4663.2007.12.027LIU X H, LIU Z M, LIU Y X, et al. Research on influential factors of visiting a doctor delay for patients with tuberculosis in victory oilfield[J]. Chin Health Serv Manage, 2007, 23(12): 855-856. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4663.2007.12.027 [4] 赵锦明. 广西平果县肺结核主动发现策略实施效果研究[D]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2015.ZHAO J M. Study on the implementation Effect of active tuberculosis detection Strategy in Pingguo County, Guangxi[D]. Nanning: Guangxi Medical University, 2015. [5] 周薇, 李海军, 陈广华, 等. 2008-2013年西安财经学院大学生肺结核患者发现效果分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2014, 36(10): 880-883. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.10.004ZHOU W, LI H J, CHEN G H, et al. Analysis of TB case-finding among students in Xi'an university of finance and economics during 2008-2013[J]. Chin J Antituberc, 2014, 36(10): 880-883. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.10.004 [6] 张凤梅, 时延利, 徐恒戬. 高等学校肺结核防控策略探讨[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2017, 30(6): 908-909. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXLL201706076.htmZHANG F M, SHI Y L, XU H J. Prevention and control strategies for tuberculosis in institutions of higher learning[J]. J Med Theory Pract, 2017, 30(6): 908-909. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXLL201706076.htm [7] 柳巍, 曾令城, 张慧, 等. 西安市大学新生结核病筛查结果分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2016, 37(2): 313-315. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.02.049LIU W, ZENG L C, ZHANG H, et al. Analysis of tuberculosis screening results of freshmen in Xi'an university[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2016, 37(2): 313-315. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.02.049 [8] 李康, 黄时勇, 刘美良, 等. 2015年广西宾阳县肺结核流行现状及其发现延迟影响因素分析[J]. 医学动物防治, 2018, 34(9): 817-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXDZ201809001.htmLI K, HUANG S Y, LIU M L, et al. Analysis of the prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and the factors associated with the delay of tuberculosis identifiction in Binyang County of Guangxi in 2015[J]. J Med Pest Control, 2018, 34(9): 817-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXDZ201809001.htm [9] 李德洋, 苏德奇, 张为胜, 等. 乌鲁木齐市肺结核患者就诊、确诊、发现延迟的影响因素[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1152-1154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX202011017.htmLI D Y, SU D Q, ZHANG W S, et al. Factors influencing the delay in diagnosis, diagnosis and discovery of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Urumqi[J]. Prev Med, 2020, 32(11): 1152-1154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYFX202011017.htm [10] 郭培军, 周正全, 王淑蕾, 等. 2011—2015年烟台市学生肺结核就诊延迟影响因素分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2016, 12(11): 1074-1078. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZISC201612005.htmGUO P J, ZHOU Z Q, WANG S L, et al. Factors influencing the delay of diagnosis and treatment among students with pulmonary tuberculosis in the City of Yantai from 2011 to 2015[J]. J Parasit Biol, 2016, 12(11): 1074-1078. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZISC201612005.htm [11] 孙宏英, 段晋超, 严昌武, 等. 四川省绵阳市2014—2018年学生结核病患者就诊延迟特征分析[J]. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2019, 6(8): 90-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBJK201902005.htmSUN H Y, DUAN J C, YAN C W, et al. Analysis of characteristics of delayed visiting in the students' patients with tuberculosis in Mianyang City from 2014 to 2018[J]. J Tubercul Lung Health, 2019, 6(8): 90-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBJK201902005.htm [12] TONY Y, GUAN X, HOU S, et al. Determinants of healthcare-seeking delay among tuberculosis patients in rural area of central china[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(9): 1998-2001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091998 [13] 赵燕, 张天华, 柳巍, 等. 陕西省2015年肺结核患者就诊延迟及其相关因素分析[J]. 中国热带医学, 2017, 17(3): 289-292. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDYX201703021.htmZHAO Y, ZHANG T H, LIU W, et al. Investigation on health seeking delay and relevant factors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Shaanxi[J]. China Trop Med, 2017, 17(3): 289-292. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDYX201703021.htm [14] 周玉兰, 邓亚利, 冉建朝, 等. 2008-2017年新疆生产建设兵团肺结核患者就诊、确诊延迟及影响因素分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2018, 45(16): 3014-3018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201816032.htmZHOU Y L, DENG Y L, RAN J C, et al. Analysis of the treatment delay, diagnosis delay and influencing factors of tuberculosis patients in Xinjiang production and construction corps from 2008 to 2017[J]. Modern Prev Med, 2015, 45(16): 3014-3018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201816032.htm [15] 王晓君, 付谦, 张正斌, 等. 武汉市2008-2017年结核病患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 643-647. https://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-JHBH201906001610.htmWANG X J, FU Q, ZHANG Z B, et al. Delay on care-seeking and related influencing factors among tuberculosis patients in Wuhan, 2008-2017[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2019, 40(6): 643-647. https://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-JHBH201906001610.htm [16] 沈鸿程, 杜雨华, 张广川, 等. 2008—2018年广州市结核病患者就诊延迟影响因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2020, 5(42): 510-517. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFLZ202005021.htmSHEN H C, DU Y H, ZHANG G C, et al. Influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patient delay in Guangzhou, 2008-2018[J]. Chin J Antituberc, 2020, 42(5): 510-517. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFLZ202005021.htm -
点击查看大图
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 633
- HTML全文浏览量: 303
- PDF下载量: 59
- 被引次数: 0
