初二年级学生功能动作筛查特点

谈艳; 李伟; 朱建勇

doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.03.029

初二年级学生功能动作筛查特点

doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.03.029

谈艳¹,
李伟^2, ,,
朱建勇¹

1.
南京邮电大学体育部，江苏 210000
2.
国家体育总局运动医学研究所

基金项目:

国家体育总局科研课题 HXKT2017001

详细信息

作者简介:
谈艳(1974-)，女，安徽蚌埠人，博士研究生，教授，主要研究方向为运动康复

通讯作者:
李伟，E-mail：kkbblu@126.com

中图分类号: R 179 G 84.49
计量
- 文章访问数: 546
- HTML全文浏览量: 340
- PDF下载量: 19
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-09-21
- 修回日期: 2021-01-15
- 网络出版日期: 2021-04-20
- 刊出日期: 2021-03-25

Characteristics of functional movement screening in junior middle school students

TAN Yan¹,
LI Wei^{2
, ,},
ZHU Jianyong¹

1.
Department of Physical Education Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing(210000), China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析体质量指数(BMI)、性别因素对青少年功能动作筛查(function movement screens, FMS)的影响，为提高青少年身体素质和运动损伤预防提供客观依据。方法选取北京某中学初二年级11~14岁中学生676名，按性别分组进行FMS总分比较；男女生分别按照BMI分组进行FMS总分比较；FMS的7个动作分别进行性别间比较及分析。探讨性别对FMS的影响、BMI与FMS关系，寻求青少年FMS特点。结果男女生BMI标准组FMS评分均高于超重组(P值均 < 0.01)，而标准组与低体重组间FMS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；BMI和FMS评分呈负相关(男生r值为-0.27，女生为-0.18，P值均 < 0.05)；FMS总分男生组低于女生组(t=-5.31，P < 0.01)；FMS各单项测试的男女比较中，除了躯干旋转稳定性外，其他各项性别组间差异均有统计学意义(P值均 < 0.05)。结论青少年FMS总评分及单项评分存在性别差异性。结合BMI指标，FMS评分能较为客观地反映青少年的整体运动能力，可作为中学生体质测试的补充参考。
- 人体质量指数 /
- 性别因素 /
- 生长和发育 /
- 青少年
Abstract: Objective The influence of BMI and gender on Function Movement Screens (FMS) was analyzed to provide objective basis for improving physical quality and prevention of sports injuries among adolescents. Methods A total of 676 junior middle school students aged between 11 and 14 in grade 2 selected from a middle school in Beijing, were grouped by sex for FMS total score comparison. FMS scores of male and female students were compared according to body mass index (BMI). The 7 movements of FMS were compared and analyzed by male and female groups respectively. The influence of gender on FMS and the relationship between BMI and FMS were explored to seek the features of FMS in Chinese adolescents. Results FMS scores of male and female students in the BMI standard group were significantly higher than those of the super-recombination group(P < 0.01); there was no significant difference in FMS scores between the standard group and the low weight group. BMI score was negatively correlated with FMS score, and the r value of boys was -0.27; for girls, the r value was -0.18(P < 0.05). The total FMS score of male group was significantly lower than that of female group, which was (13.09±2.17) for male group and (13.91±1.79) for female group(t=-5.31, P < 0.01). In comparison between men and women on each FMS test, there were significant differences in all categories except for the stability of trunk rotation (P < 0.05). Conclusion Combined with BMI, FMS score can objectively reflect the overall athletic ability of adolescents. There were gender differences in FMS total score and individual score. FMS score can be used as a supplementary reference for physical fitness test of middle school students.
- Body mass index /
- Sex factors /
- Growth and development /
- Adolescent

HTML全文

表 1 男女生FMS总分和各单项得分比较(x±s)

Table 1. Comparison of FMS scores and individual scores of male and female middle school students (x±s)

性别	人数	举棍深蹲	跨栏架步	直线弓箭步	肩部灵活性	主动直膝抬腿	俯卧撑	躯干旋转稳定性	总分
男	360	1.79±0.55	1.69±0.60	1.68±0.58	2.87±0.41	2.00±0.67	1.53±0.63	1.53±0.55	13.09±2.17
女	316	1.69±0.53	1.90±0.61	1.91±0.51	2.94±0.33	2.43±0.62	1.35±0.55	1.52±0.52	13.91±1.79
t值		2.40	-4.51	-5.44	-2.42	-8.62	3.93	0.24	-5.31
P值		0.02	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.00	0.00	0.77	0.00

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同BMI分组受试者FMS评分比较

Table 2. Comparison of FMS scores in BMI subgroups

组别	男生		女生
组别	人数	x±s	人数	x±s
标准组	201	13.49±2.18	229	14.12±1.80
低体重组	21	13.67±2.27	7	13.42±1.27
超重组	138	12.42±1.96	80	13.36±1.70
F值		11.35		5.77
P值		0.00		0.00

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	郭瑞芃, 徐建方, 李良, 等. 中外青少年体质健康测评体系对比研究[J]. 中国体育科技, 2019, 55(6): 3-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTY201906001.htm GUO R P, XU J F, LI L, et al. A comparison on the assessment systems of physical fitness for adolescents in China and other countries or regions[J]. China Sports Sci Technol, 2019, 55(6): 3-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTY201906001.htm
[2]	MITCHELL U H, WAYNEJOHNSON A, VEHRS P R, et al. Performance on the functional movement screen in older active adults[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2016, 5(1): 119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.04.006
[3]	MEGHAN W, MONICA R L, NICOLE J C, et al. Utility of FMS to understand injury incidence in sports: current perspectives[J]. Open Access J Sports Med, 2018, 9: 171-182. DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S149139.
[4]	徐欣, 卢洋, 高亚强, 等. 功能动作测试在中学生基本运动能力评价中的应用[J]. 体育科研, 2014, 35(6): 74-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYKA201406018.htm XU X, LU Y, GAO Y Q, et al. Application of function movement screens in evaluation of basic sports ability of middle school students[J]. Sports Res, 2014, 35(6): 74-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYKA201406018.htm
[5]	孙莉莉. 美国功能动作测试(FMS)概述[J]. 体育科研, 2011, 32(5): 29-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYKA201105009.htm SUN L L. Summary of the functional movement screen in the US[J]. Sports Res, 2011, 32(5): 29-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYKA201105009.htm
[6]	中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《国家学生体质健康标准(2014年修订)》的通知教体艺[2014]5号[A]. 2014-07-07. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Notice of the Ministry of Education on the issuance of the national student physical health standards (2014 revised) Education Art[2014] No. 5[A]. 2014-07-07.
[7]	DUNCAN M J, STANLEY M. Functional movement is negatively associated with weight status and positively associated with physical activity in British primary school children[J]. J Obes, 2012, 26(3): 697563. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545208
[8]	HUOTARI P, HEIKINARO-JOHANSSON P, WATT A, et al. Fundamental movement skills in adolescents: secular trends from 2003 to 2010 and associations with physical activity and BMI[J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2018, 28(3): 1121-1129. doi: 10.1111/sms.13028
[9]	MEGAN E C, DANIELLE R B, CINDY L, et al. Association between functional movements skills and health indicators in children aged between 9 and 12 years[J]. Old Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017, 14(9): 1010-1024. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091010
[10]	SCHNEIDERS A G, DAVIDSSON A, HORMAN E, et al. Functional movement screen normative values in a young active population[J]. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2011, 6(2): 75-82. http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3109893/
[11]	KENJI K, MASASHI S, JUNTA I, et al. Functional movements in Japanese mini-basketball players[J]. J Hum Kinet, 2018, 61(1): 53-62. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0128
[12]	焦广发, 刘徽, 王海英, 等. 功能性运动筛查应用研究进展: 评价方法、信度、标准[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2015, 41(1): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SORT201501005.htm JIAO G F, LIU H, WANG H Y, et al. Applied research progress of functional movement screen: evaluation methods, reliability and dtandard[J]. J Chengdu Inst Phys Educ, 2015, 41(1): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SORT201501005.htm
[13]	ROBIN M O, RODNEY P, MICHAEL S, et al. A functional movement screen profile of an Australian state police force: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2016, 17(7): 296. http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4950801/
[14]	MCGILL S, FROST D, LAM T, et al. Fitness and movement quality of emergency task force police officers: an age-grouped database with comparison to populations of emergency services personnel, athletes and the general public[J]. Int J Ind Ergon, 2013, 43(2): 146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.11.013
[15]	AGRESTA C, SLOBODINSKY M, TUCKER C. Functional movement screenTM-Normative values in healthy distance runners[J]. Int J Sports Med, 2014, 35(14): 1203-1207. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382055
[16]	BRUNO S, LUIS P A R, FILIPE M C, et al. Association between motor competence and functional movement screen scores[J]. Peer J, 2019, 7: e7270. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7270.
[17]	KIESEL K, PLISKY P J, VOIGHT M L. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen?[J]. N Am J Sports Phys Ther, 2007, 2(3): 147-158. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21522210
[18]	O'CONNOR F G, DEUSTER P A, DAVIS J, et al. Functional movement screening: predicting injuries in officer candidates[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2011, 43(12): 2224-2230. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d
[19]	ANDREW A T, JENNIFER S, CHLOE W, et al. A comparison of the functional movement screen and the landing error scoring system: a cohort study[J]. Curr Orthop Pract, 2020, 31(1): 8-12. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000822
[20]	CHANG W D, CHOU L W, CHANG N J, et al. Comparison of functional movement screen, star excursion balance test, and physical fitness in junior athletes with different sports injury risk[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2020, 25(2): 1-8. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/340212185_Comparison_of_Functional_Movement_Screen_Star_Excursion_Balance_Test_and_Physical_Fitness_in_Junior_Athletes_with_Different_Sports_Injury_Risk