摘要:
确定公共卫生专业学生伤害预防核心能力评价指标及其权重,以建立系统完整的伤害预防核心能力评估指标.方法 邀请22位国内外伤害预防领域的专家参与德尔菲专家咨询,根据咨询结果删选指标并采用层次分析法确定最终指标的权重.结果 根据德尔菲专家咨询结果构建的评估指标包括5个一级指标和31个二级指标,采用层次分析法得到了二级指标权重,其中一级指标权重:“伤害问题分析评估能力”为0.298,“伤害预防项目计划和实施能力”为0.237,“沟通交流能力”为0.199,“社区实践能力”为0.169,“领导和系统思维能力”为0.097.排在前5位的二级指标权重:“描述哪些因素会导致伤害的能力”为0.051,“获取、收集、分析、应用和传播伤害信息的能力”为0.046,“具备实施伤害预防和干预措施/活动的能力”为0.044,“向社区人员、其他专业人员、关键的政策制定者,有效地传播伤害预防信息的能力”为0.044,“具备制定伤害预防项目总目标和分目标的能力”为0.041.结论 本研究构建的公共卫生专业学生伤害预防核心能力评估指标及其权重客观可信,可用于推动我国医学院校建立科学的伤害预防课程体系及课程考核机制.
Abstract:
Objective To determine the framework and weights of indexes for assessing core competencies of public health students for injury prevention,and to establish a set of systematic indices for evaluating core campetencies of public health students for injury prevention.Methods A total of twenty-two experts in the field of injury prevention at home and abroad were invited to participate in 2-round Delphi process.The indices were selected in accordance with the result of each consultation.Then the weights of the final indexes were determined with analytic hierarchy process(AHP).Results According to Delphi expert consultation results,the final evaluation indexes included 5 first-level indicators and 31 second-level indicators.The first-level indicators' weights and the corresponding second-level indicators' weights were obtained by AHP.And the weights of the first-level indicators were as follows:the weight of "the ability to analyze and evaluate injury problems" was 0.298,the weight of "the ability to plan and implement injury prevention programs" was 0.237,the weight of "communication competence" was 0.199,the weight of "the ability to practice in community" was 0.169,and the weight of "leadership and systematic thinking ability" was 0.097.The weights of top five second-level indicators were as follows:the weight of "ability to describe what factors can lead to injury" was 0.051,the weight of "ability to access,collect,analyze,use and disseminate injury data and information" was 0.046,the weight of "ability to implement injury prevention measures and activity" was 0.044,the weight of "ablity to effectively disseminate injury prevention information to the community,key policy makers and other proficiency" was 0.044,and the weight of "ability to develop injury prevention program goals and objectives" was 0.041.Conclusion In terms of establishing a set of systematic indices for evaluating core competencies of public health students for injury prevention,the evaluation indices and their weights are objective and credible,which can be used to establish scientific injury prevention courses and corresponding curriculum assessment mechanism.
点击查看大图
下载:
